Barak Obama and religion


On 27 Dec, 2006 By mpm

I've been perusing my blog stats over the past few days, and the most common way that people have been finding my site via Google and other search engines is by searching for some combination of "barak obama" and "faith" or "religion".

A while ago, I'd come across a post by a conservative blogger who was basically suggesting that because Barak Obama's middle name is "Hussein", that must mean that he's a Muslim. In fact, her post is titled "Once a Muslim, always a Muslim" - which is a reference to the Islamic point of view about whether or not one is a Muslim. Further, she talks about the fact that his mother married an Indonesian, which means to her that he's a Muslim simply because most Indonesians are (never mind that she doesn't know, really what he is.) And that Barak has an affinity for Kenyan culture (which is overwhelmingly Christian, but she reminds us that Islam is on the rise there.)

Anyway, she's going farther than anyone should reasonably go. But she, along with the congressman who worries about any more Muslims being elected to office, are acting as if Muslims are about to take over the US.

So, of course, Barak Obama is suspect. Not because he's black, which, of course, in this country is reason enough for suspicion. No, he is suspect because of his middle name, and because of association with others in his family. Nevermind that he is a Christian, and openly talks about his faith.

The world is a much smaller place than it used to be, and this country is increasingly a representation of that smallness. Religion and faith are much more malleable and changeable categories than they used to be, too. Until we are willing to see people for who they are, but instead see them for their skin color, or their religion, or their culture, or any of a half-dozen other ways that they are different than we are, we're going to keep getting into trouble with the world, and with each other.

Right now, Obama and Clinton are in a dead heat in NH, although it's a full year before the primaries. He might just be a contender for President in 2008. And you know what? A President with the middle name of "Hussein" sounds like a good idea to me.

A Christmas prayer


On 25 Dec, 2006 By mpm

As I go off to spend what is, in some regards, a very non-traditional Christmas of a walk on the beach, Asian food, and a visit to Osento, I wanted to wish everyone the following prayer:

[May God be with you on this day,\ May you know Her presence, and may that\ bring you gladness and warmth.\ May your inner Christ shine through\ showing compassion and unconditional love\ to all of those you meet today.\ \ May the coming days, and the New Year,\ bring you closer to being able\ to live the good that you know,\ and may the world finally\ know the peace that we yearn for in our hearts.]{style="color:#777777;"}

Blessings to you all. May your time today, whether it be with yourself, or with others that you know and love, be fulfilling and enjoyable.

New SF Meme


On 23 Dec, 2006 By mpm

Here's a new SF books meme, which, I think, is better than the last meme, which had no women authors. This is a longer list, and has some women in it.

I got this from Lou Anders. This is the Science Fiction Book Club's list of the fifty most significant science fiction/fantasy novels published between 1953 and 2002.

The Key:\ Bold the ones you've read.\ Strike-out the ones you hated.\ Italicize those you started but never finished.\ Put an asterisk beside the ones you loved.

1. The Lord of the Rings, J.R.R. Tolkien*\ 2. The Foundation Trilogy, Isaac Asimov \ 3. Dune, Frank Herbert*\ 4. Stranger in a Strange Land, Robert A. Heinlein*\ 5. A Wizard of Earthsea, Ursula K. Le Guin*\ 6. Neuromancer, William Gibson\ 7. Childhood's End, Arthur C. Clarke\ 8. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, Philip K. Dick\ 9. The Mists of Avalon, Marion Zimmer Bradley*\ 10. Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury\ 11. The Book of the New Sun, Gene Wolfe\ 12. A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller, Jr.\ 13. The Caves of Steel, Isaac Asimov\ 14. Children of the Atom, Wilmar Shiras\ 15. Cities in Flight, James Blish*\ 16. The Colour of Magic, Terry Pratchett\ 17. Dangerous Visions, edited by Harlan Ellison\ 18. Deathbird Stories, Harlan Ellison\ 19. The Demolished Man, Alfred Bester\ 20. Dhalgren, Samuel R. Delany*\ 21. Dragonflight, Anne McCaffrey*\ 22. Ender's Game, Orson Scott Card*\ 23. The First Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, Stephen R. Donaldson\ 24. The Forever War, Joe Haldeman\ 25. Gateway, Frederik Pohl\ 26. Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone, J.K. Rowling*\ 27. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams*\ 28. I Am Legend, Richard Matheson\ 29. Interview with the Vampire, Anne Rice\ 30. The Left Hand of Darkness, Ursula K. Le Guin\ 31. Little, Big, John Crowley\ 32. Lord of Light, Roger Zelazny\ 33. The Man in the High Castle, Philip K. Dick\ 34. Mission of Gravity, Hal Clement\ 35. More Than Human, Theodore Sturgeon\ 36. The Rediscovery of Man, Cordwainer Smith\ 37. On the Beach, Nevil Shute\ 38. Rendezvous with Rama, Arthur C. Clarke\ 39. Ringworld, Larry Niven*\ 40. Rogue Moon, Algis Budrys\ 41. The Silmarillion, J.R.R. Tolkien\ 42. Slaughterhouse-5, Kurt Vonnegut\ 43. Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson\ 44. Stand on Zanzibar, John Brunner*\ 45. The Stars My Destination, Alfred Bester\ 46. Starship Troopers, Robert A. Heinlein\ 47. Stormbringer, Michael Moorcock\ 48. The Sword of Shannara, Terry Brooks\ 49. Timescape, Gregory Benford\ 50. To Your Scattered Bodies Go, Philip Jose Farmer

I've read 31 of the 50. Not too bad.

A letter to Tricycle


On 23 Dec, 2006 By mpm

I don't often write letters to the editor. I've been reading Tricycle off and on for a long time. I had unsubscribed during my time in seminary, but I have re-upped, and got the first issue in the mail a few days ago. Somehow, I'm looking at those articles with very different eyes. Tricycle covers quite a broad range of Buddhist traditions in the US, and often engages in interesting and sometimes difficult conversations about the practice of Buddhism in the West.

I wrote this letter to the editor in response to an article in the current issue by Cynthia Thatcher. It was a good article, but it spurred me to write this letter:

Dear Tricycle,

I do appreciate the myth-busting that Cynthia Thatcher engaged in when she spoke about the present moment in her article "What's so Great About Now?" I definitely agree with her assertion that being aware of the present moment doesn't mean that we all of a sudden will see some amazing hidden beauty in that moment, and it is that beauty that makes us happy. The present moment can be unsatisfactory (although it is most often because we are caught up in things that are not occurring at the present moment), and our awareness of the unsatisfactoriness of the coming and passing away of things is an incredibly important teaching. But her idea that all there is as one becomes aware in the present moment is being aware of the unsatisfactoriness of that moment is not one that I can relate to.

I speak not as a Buddhist scholar - this is from my own experience. Her point of view is a reflection of an especially arid form of Buddhist thought that I find common, but, to my mind unfortunate. It has been my experience that some times when I am most aware in the moment - I become aware of my connection to what is greater than myself. For me, I think of that as my connection to the Divine - but there are all sorts of other ways people express it. To assert that "bare attention doesn't expose some hidden core of radiance in the empty vibrations; no such core exists" is to, in my opinion, strip the numinous from the mundane. No, I don't meditate to find happiness in hidden beauty in the mundane moment - I meditate to become aware of everything in the moment - the unsatisfactory and the numinous.

Metta,\ Michelle Murrain

Moving ...


On 15 Dec, 2006 By mpm

sucks. Of course, everyone knows this. What's interesting to me, is that even if you don't actually expend much physical effort in carrying stuff from place to truck to place, it is still physically, mentally and emotionally draining. Anyways, my first move is done. I'm in Oakland, moved out of my room in Benton (one of the PSR dorms.) I handed in my keys, forwarded my mail, got all of the signatures necessary so I can actually get my Certificate in the mail sometime this summer. It will be interesting living in Oakland for about a month. Here's the place (care of Google Earth):

Picture
3{width="369" height="200"}[\ ]{style="font-size:0pt;"}

It feels strange, to be gone - to finish this chapter of my life. My friends at PSR had a really sweet party for me on Wed night. I feel both sad to leave PSR, and them, and ready to move on with the next phase.

The winner is ...


On 09 Dec, 2006 By mpm

70487743.1{width="128" height="100"}\ Chesterfield, Cummington, Ashfield, Leverett, Sunderland, Buckland, Deerfield, Leeds, Wendell, South Hadley ... Shutesbury. After 3 trips to Massachusetts (Ruth took three, I only took one of those) looking at lots and lots of houses in lots and lots of places, we've found the house we will be living in (barring, of course, unfortunate circumstances). It's a cute little cape on a small dirt road in northern Shutesbury, just south of Lake Wyola, and across a driveway from Ames Pond.

It's just about everything we'd been looking for: away from any traffic, no neighbors we could see, and close to water (we'd have preferred water actually on the land, but this is a good compromise.) It's a nice size, has a fireplace on the main floor, and a wood stove downstairs. It has room enough for all three of us (that's me, Ruth, and the cat - how typical lesbian.) It's got almost 3 acres to play with, and lots of light.

So, there are the practicalities to deal with, but we'll be in the house by the middle of February, possibly early February. It means that we're leaving here later than we thought, which is fine. It gives me some more time to get everything settled.

One snag: no easy broadband. Of course I pretty much already knew this about the kinds of places we were looking at, and had done some research on satellite broadband. It will present some technical challenges for me, but nothing I can't overcome.

You never, ever know


On 08 Dec, 2006 By mpm

One of the things I look at, on occasion, is the search terms people use to find my blog. They can be entertaining, or sometimes just plain wierd. So here are a few:

  • The obvious, and interesting: "barak obama *" (where * is "faith", "religious views" or "speech"), "audre lorde", "oj simpson interview","seminary", "overfarming"
  • The humorous: "barak obama antichrist", "nazarene weekly torah lesson", "christmas wrong", "bezerk leisure northampton", "seminary lesbians undergoing theological stress"
  • The puzzling: "1950s panties", "wikipedia are poinsettas poisonious", "women leaders of ancient egypt"
  • The embarrasing: "guerro negro" (I misspelled it on a post - it's really Guerrero Negro)

Spiritual Community


On 03 Dec, 2006 By mpm

It's Sunday morning, and I'm not going to church. I've not been to church in weeks and weeks (except a couple of exceptions to see friends preach.) On one hand, I find this curious. I definitely enjoyed going to the church I was going to here in Berkeley, New Spirit Community Church, which I think, actually, is fabulous. I do sometimes go to the Taizé service.

I first stopped going because I needed to break out of that role of "minister in training" (I was "In Care"). And as I continued to not go on Sunday mornings, and as I've begun to restructure my own spiritual path around the new realities of my life (how you build a life centered on spirituality as a "householder" as the Buddhists would call it,) going back just didn't seem like something I wanted to do.

I've begun to build in my head what I really want from spiritual community. And as I think about it, I've come to realize that it possibly doesn't exist yet. There are some communities that seem to have come relatively close (Chochmat Halev for one.)

I've learned a lot about what I don't like about some spiritual communities I've been a part of. As much as I've valued my Christian experiences, I can't do the dogmatism of fundamentalist Christianity, even as I appreciate their focus on spiritual practice. When it comes to mainline Christianity, I have a hard time embracing the Trinity, and building a life of spiritual practice around it. When it comes to Unitarian Universalism, I don't want a spirituality stripped of Mystery, and I don't want to have disagreements about using reverential language before people have really examined their own reactivity to it. I don't want a community that embraces all but the religious tradition that spawned it. And I have a hard doing social action without deep spiritual meaning. When it comes to Buddhist Sangha, I don't want a spirituality that is based primarily on meditation practice. (Whine, whine, whine... OK, I'm done.)

I've learned a lot from a wide variety of traditions. From Christanity I've learned the value of the Book, and that the words and life of Jesus mean something to me. From the peace traditions of Chrisitanity, I've learned about the value of a spiritual approach to social action, and non-hierarchichal worship. From Buddhism, I've learned about the value of daily spiritual practices that help me connect with the present moment, and use skillful means to bring myself to awareness. From Judaism, I've learned about my deep yearning for spiritual practices connected to the week and to the calendar that keep me in touch with God. From Unitarian Universalism, I've learned about embracing a wide variety of traditions, and using reason. From the mystical traditions of all religions, I've learned about the underlying deep mysteries of existence that I want to explore. I've learned from Shamanism that there is wisdom inside me, and around me that I can tap to understand myself and the world. I've also learned, along the way, that it's really hard to separate the psychological and the spiritual - that they need to be incorporated together in one's spiritual path.

So all this combines to ...

... a spiritual community that is panentheistic, but theologically very flexible and diverse - a community of mystics. A community that is deeply committed to, and creative and experimental in, spiritual practice and ritual. A community that has people willing to explore their own points of view, issues, and perspectives as they explore the Divine. A community that is engaged in thoughtful and prayerful social action. A community that is anti-oppresion, but also deeply thoughtful about what that means, and the ways we contribute to our own oppression, and the oppression of others. A community where everyone is both a leader, and a follower. A community that is committed to embracing the web of life.

I know that there is more, and that this will develop over time. But that's what I've come to so far.

Spirituality and Vocation


On 26 Nov, 2006 By mpm

Obviously, one of the primary things that has been on my mind over the last few months, and, indeed, the last couple of years of this seminary journey, has been the relationship between my spirituality and my vocation (or avocation - the ways I spend most of my time.)

In my piece on leaving seminary, I talked about how most of the reason for choosing to go to seminary was that I had a desire to center my life around spirituality, faith, and spiritual practice. And I learned, in the course of going to seminary, and choosing to leave it, that I really didn't need to become a religious professional to do that. And I also learned that ministry comes in many different guises - many that were not in that traditional sense, organized ministry.

So, here I am, now, beginning my re-entry into the nonprofit technology field, as well as trying to be a writer, and explore other kinds of avenues for sharing what I have learned. So now, how am I centering my life on spirituality and spiritual practice? It's going to be an evolving question, with changing answers. I'm looking for ways to deepen my own spiritual practices, and imbed them into my daily, monthly and yearly life. I'm being clearer about how I work, and how much I work, and exactly what I do. I'm better understanding the kinds of ways my "ministry" will best manifest itself in those work environments.

I've always been able to find work that has meaning to me. The work I've been doing in the nonprofit technology field for the last 10 years has been really fulfilling, and I do feel like I've had a chance to do be involved in doing some real good for organizations that do some really good work in the world. Sometimes it feels a little removed, other times much more direct. I think I've come to the place where I want to more deeply examine how I, and others, do that work, and the ways in which that can foster, or detract, from the work organizations do (hence, my "Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology" blog.)

But there is the different kind of work for me in writing. It is, in a different way, direct and indirect in its impact. I have much more exploration and experimentation to do in that realm.

And I know that going forward, this evolving life may or may not include deep involvement in a religious community. That's another evolving question, with changing answers. In this time of transition, I have become unmoored from any religious community, and right now, that seems to be OK. But I imagine that might change as I settle down.

There will be more on this topic in this blog, for sure, as I get settled, and things start to emerge.

Slow blogging months


On 24 Nov, 2006 By mpm

Well, the next couple of months or so are going to be slow blogging months. First off, I have two final papers due - the only assignments for my two classes this semester. I'm looking forward to writing them. One of them, for "Psychology of Religion" is going to be a fictitious email exchange between C.G. Jung and Julian of Norwich. The second one is going to be a paper that examines the how the actions of God could be reconciled with science by using process theology, and a science informed by critiques of western science. I'll likely post them both when done on my main website.

Secondly, I've also begun to do a lot of my old work. It's been good, and also a bit of cold water. I feel like I've been actively scraping off 18 months of rust from my geek gears. It's been mostly fun, and I've also had to be much more conscious about the ways in which work became stressful for me, and took me away from being conscious and aware (more on that in my next blog entry.) It's nice getting re-acquainted with the nonprofit technology field.

Thirdly, and yes, there's more ... I'm moving. Twice. I'll be leaving the dorms in mid-December to move to Oakland, then Ruth and I will be moving out east sometime in early January. A lot is still up in the air - you'll hear about it here, I expect.

So I expect blogging will be in fits and starts, and slow.

What is wrong with this picture? Part 2


On 18 Nov, 2006 By mpm

OK, so it's bad enough that people are lining up for days to get these consoles. But getting shot? Apparently, violence has erupted at many spots where new Playstations are being sold.

What's up with that? I guess where money and desire are, violence may follow. But it just seems so, well, pointless.

What some people do for money


On 15 Nov, 2006 By mpm

I happened across this article by happenstance. Please read it. Or if you want, read this one. The basic gist is this: OJ Simpson, who was acquitted of murder in 1994, and claimed his innocence, will be paid a boat load of money for a new book, and an interview on Fox. What's the subject? "If I did it, this is how it happened." Basically, he is confessing to have done it.

I always knew he did it, although I also always thought there was reasonable doubt, so I felt the verdict was correct. But to turn around and make millions of dollars off of a murder that one got away with is, well, problematic at best.

I don't entirely fault him, of course. Because if there wasn't a book industry, or media that knew they could make money off of this, this would have never happened. And, of course, if there weren't people who will spend the money to buy the book, or will watch the interview, it never would happen either.

I think this is one of the most telling indictments of our current mass media culture, that a murderer who got away with it now stands to make a lot of money off of it. Someone should have simply said, "no."

Someone really needs to get a life


On 13 Nov, 2006 By mpm

OK, so I'm not your average gadget geek, even though I read blogs about them, and the like. And I do like playing games sometimes. This year, the big news is that people are camping out so that they can have a chance at getting the new game consoles.

Right. They are camping out for days next to their Best Buy or Circuit City, or what have you, in order to pay premium prices for something that will be available for a lot less money in less than a year. Something they don't need so badly (I'm sure most of them have a XBox 360 in their living room gathering dust while they sit in line.)

What is wrong with this picture?

Ted Haggard and me


On 12 Nov, 2006 By mpm

For some reason I can't quite figure out, I'm a little obsessed by Ted Haggard. I read lots of news items and then blog posts about the whole situation. I've seen the videos of him, and Mike Jones. At odd times of the day I'll think about what his life is like right now. I feel sad and feel compassion for what he is going through now as America's current most famous fallen Christian. His life is a complete mess.

There are so many threads of thought that come to me from this whole situation. From his own life, both inner and outer, at this moment, and the life of his family. And, the issue of how progressives should see it. In the blogosphere, there has been plenty of gloating, talk about his hypocrisy. Plenty of compassionate wishes from progressive Christians, calls to not be judgmental.

On one hand, I struggle with saying that in order to find a way out of his pain, he needs to find a more open kind of faith - one that embraces different sexualities. He has his faith, he has his beliefs that he wants to live his life within. Who am I to suggest that he should find a new framework? Perhaps, somehow, within that, he'll find some peace. But then it is this framework that has created so much pain for so many people, and continues to create pain for people.

And then I think about the political aspects. The ways that people like him (and him in particular) see themselves vis-á-vis people like me. I live an immoral, depraved life according to him. I don't deserve equal rights, my partner and I (not that we necessarily want them, but ...) can never have the rights of a heterosexual married couple according to him. Ted Haggard worked hard against what could be considered my best interests.

I imagine at some point, I'll stop having these moments of wondering how Ted Haggard is feeling. But until then, I hope that he finds a way to some peace with himself, and who he is.

I think it was ...


On 09 Nov, 2006 By mpm

... this I was waiting to blog about (George 'macaca' Allen conceeded). The elections are done, and the fallout has begun. Everyone expected the Democrats to take the House. Everyone thought that the Dems would at best get to 50/50, leaving the Republicans in control. But, in fact, the Dems now have both.

This is going to be a very interesting two years.

I like this quote


On 09 Nov, 2006 By mpm

I often read Radical Torah, and yesterday's message by one of my favorite bloggers, Rachel Barenblat, about this weeks Torah portion was really nice. I think we could all use some of this. Here is a salient quote:

What Abraham knew, and what we struggle to remember and affirm, is that the people we encounter are indeed messengers of the Holy Blessed One. The message we all bear is that we are created b'tselem Elohim, in God's image; no matter our differences, we are all reflections of the living God. When we choose to open our doors and our hearts to the people we meet, we embody the wise welcome that characterized our ancestor Abraham in his desert dwelling. As we orient ourselves in relationship to the wild and wide world, may we experience Abraham's ability to make the stranger truly welcome. It's a blessing we can offer to the people we encounter --- and in so doing, to ourselves.

Hopeful Quote of the Day


On 08 Nov, 2006 By mpm

From Amy Sullivan:

When Democrats talk about reaching out to religious voters--particularly evangelicals--critics on the left often complain that such a strategy can work only with conservative, pro-life candidates like Bob Casey. There is no way, they argue, to win the support of moderate evangelicals and Catholics without changing the party's positions on abortion and gay marriage.\ ...\ Democrats who envision a future of hard-core, pro-life, anti-gay-rights candidates as their only hope can stop hyperventilating. It turns out that moderate evangelical and Catholic voters are willing to push the button for Democratic candidates. But sometimes it helps to talk to them first.

Election Night Musings


On 07 Nov, 2006 By mpm

As you know, I don't own a TV. But there are some times when a TV comes in handy. One of those times is election night. So I took myself downstairs, and sat in front of the big screen TV in the lounge that I basically almost never watch. I'm not going to fill you in on all of the news of who won what. I'm not one of those political bloggers who CNN invited to a blog party. No live blogging the election results for me.

I just have a few pre-bedtime musings.

First, it's great that the Democrats seem to have won the House. I think at least that means that Bush will get some needed oversight, and maybe perhaps he'll be forced to obey the law. No guarantees, there. But it's not clear to me whether it was that people thought that the Dems were really better, or they were just sick of the lying, cheating, corrupt hypocrites.

There is some interesting news in the ballot initiatives. People don't like the idea of gay marriage. They really don't. There is one state, Arizona, where it appears that the ballot measure to ban gay marriage might be defeated. But in all of the other states, it looks like they'll probably win, in some places, handily. Maybe it's time to let this one take a rest for a while? People also seem to not want to go any further in limiting abortion. That horrible South Dakota ban was defeated, and it looks, so far, that the various parental notification initiatives might well fail.

What does this really all mean? Well, things will get interesting for the next two years, but I'm not convinced anything much will get done.

What can we learn from this?


On 03 Nov, 2006 By mpm

Less than a week before a controversial ballot measure in Colorado to legalize same sex partnerships, one of the key opponents to that measure, Ted Haggard, is accused of having a three year sexual relationship with a male escort, Mike Jones.

He denies the allegations totally, but then, we find out later, that he contacted Jones for a massage, and bought meth from him. So, I guess we don't really know what happened. And I'm glad that both Chuck Currie and Faithful Democrats are taking the high road - reminding everyone that it's important to look at the plank in our own eyes, before we try to point out the speck in someone else's.

But I wonder, more broadly, what this teaches us? There is a whole long list of people now, who have been espousing their own moral superiority, and the supposed moral high ground of their perspective, and have been discovered to be not all that they appeared to be, not all that they wanted others to think they were.

It's not really time to gloat, or take pleasure in the fall of those we disagree with. It's time to remember the adage: power corrupts. It is, after all, power that people are looking for. And it might be power itself that's the problem.

News Fatigue


On 02 Nov, 2006 By mpm

I realized I hadn't written a blog entry in a while, and as usual, I was perusing my (very big) RSS feeds that I read regularly for some tidbits that I felt moved enough to post about. But it's all the same stuff: bad news getting worse in Iraq, people campaigning in the elections are mostly talking about things that are beside the point, the economy is going into the tank, all the while dire warnings about the environment keep coming.

I'm getting pretty tired. Time to look for some good news.

Househunting


On 27 Oct, 2006 By mpm

Some of you know that I am most likely moving back to Western Massachusetts at the beginning of next year. I do like California, but W. Mass very much feels like my home, and I'd wanted to return. There is a way that the landscape enriches me, and enfolds me, that I haven't found anywhere else. Thankfully, Ruth is willing, able, and interested to move. So that is the plan.

We just spent the last few days here in W. Mass house hunting. We spent two days driving around, looking at a lot of places, from New Salem to Chester, and almost every town in between. Some we just drove by, and could tell we wouldn't want to live there. Others we got out of the car, walked around, and tried to feel how the setting and the house felt - to see whether it was possible to imagine living in that place.

Today, we went to four houses that were on the top of our list - to look at the inside, talk with the realtor (who has done a real yeoman's job for us) get a better feeling for the houses, and what they are like. One was a sort-of in-town rather ordinary house, on a quiet street (next to a very un-ordinary contemporary house) that had a nice view. One was an apple farm with a completely stunning view in a far away town, that would be a huge project. One was probably one of the strangest houses that exist (the story behind the house was rather interesting.) And one was an unusual converted mill in a sweet setting next to a rushing stream.

One of the things we've been talking about is how this process is, at some level, not at all about any of the houses, or one particular house. It's not about how many bedrooms they have, or how big or small they are, or what kind of heating system they have. Or, really, how much they cost. It's about our own understandings about home, the things we attach to it (or have been attached to it by our pasts) our own graspings and aversions, our sets of motivations and reasonings and questions about the lives we want to lead.

I'm reminded of a friend of mine who moved to New Mexico, to work with some folks who see building houses as a spiritual practice, because of all of the things that get brought up in the process - things that, in the end, aren't about the house at all. This is the same - finding a house has been, for us, a spiritual practice and teacher, because of all that it has brought to the forefront.

We both have the extraordinary gift of being able to live basically anywhere. It is both a gift, and a burden sometimes - it leads to so many possible options (except McMansions in housing developments.) But we also have ideas and dreams about community, and being of service, and those are very important to us. We haven't made a final decision yet, and if we don't, we'll rent a house for a while. But the process has been illuminating, sometimes stressful, often enjoyable, always deep, and quite educational. And truly full and rich. I'll keep you posted.

Unintended consequences


On 19 Oct, 2006 By mpm

You know about Tamiflu, right? Tamiflu is the anti-viral drug that many people are stocking up on, in case of a flu pandemic. Never mind that it's not at all clear that it will work.

Well, there is worse yet. A new study suggests that the use of Tamiflu for a pandemic will have potentially damaging effects on the environment, as well as create the conditions for new, resistant strains of flu virus. This is pretty familiar - the reason we have so many antibiotic resistant bacteria is because of the widespread use of antibiotics.

So, here it is - we are doing something that makes us feel safer, but getting ourselves into worse trouble. Sound familiar? I think a blog post about that phenomenon might be in order, at some point.

Does TV Cause Autism?


On 17 Oct, 2006 By mpm

One of the things that I have always wondered about is what the effect of television would be on developing brains. I kinda thought that the rapid increase in the diagnosis of things like ADHD, for instance, might be related in some way. One of the hallmarks of TV is that no visual cut lasts for more than 30 seconds or so, which would seem, to me, to have a  potential effect on the developing brain.

The cause of Autism has been up in the air for a while. It is known that there are genetic factors at work, and some have suggested that vaccines might be a culprit. Now, three researchers are saying that early TV exposure in children might be a cause.

There are a couple of caviats here, right off the bat. None of the researchers seem to have medical, science, or public health backgrounds - they are economists. This raises a red flag for me. But, perhaps they are looking at it from a sufficiently fresh perspective. But it also has not gone through peer review, from what I can tell.\

So, I've downloaded the article, and read it. Here is my analysis:

They state that the current view in the field is that Autism is caused by a genetic predisposition, and an environmental trigger. They are suggesting that the environmental trigger is television.

The way that they are getting to this is pretty indirect. They are looking at county-by-county rates of cable TV subscription, and, well, precipitation. Yes, precipitation. Apparently, according to some specific studies (American Time Use Survey) young children watch TV more when it rains.

They say that 40% of the autism cases are due to increased TV watching due to precipitation, and 17% of the growth in Autism cases in the states they studied are due to increases in cable TV subscriptions.

So problem #1: the data they use to correlate TV watching with precipitation is data that is self-reporting about how people spend their time, and who else in the household is present at the time. If they were people with public health backgrounds, they would know that self-reporting is problematic. They take the self-reports basically as gospel, and don't really ask about how the self-reports might be biased.

Problem #2: They suggest that increases in use of cable TV in homes during the 1970s and 1980s would increase the amount of time that children watched TV. But there is no data to back this up. Since they are talking about children under 3, this seems a problematic assumption. Yes, rates of autism are correlated with increases in cable TV, but its pretty weak. So a weak correlation with something that isn't backed up is, well, useless.

Bottom line: It's a pretty flawed study, but I guess an argument can be made that it makes it worth looking into, at least. There needs to be a serious case-control study, etc. The public health mantra is: "correlation is not causation" (oh, right, they aren't in public health) and this paper certainly only hints at a correlation. It's not even a slam dunk for that.

So, I think I see why it hasn't been peer reviewed.

UUism and Christianity, update


On 12 Oct, 2006 By mpm

It's kinda funny that I was musing about this - I found out today that Bill Sinkford, President of the UUA, and John Thomas, president of the UCC are going to have a conversation that

will reflect on the historical affinities and divisions between their denominations, and then go on to explore current realities and future possibilities. This exchange is of interest to clergy and congregants in both denominations because, despite theological differences and the historical controversy that led to their split, in recent years there has been a growing solidarity of the two groups. On a number of issues of progressive religious conviction and social justice the two share common perspectives, and in some communities there are some churches that have become aligned with both denominations.

That sounds pretty interesting. I know someone here at PSR who is going, so I'm looking forward to hearing what happens. Maybe they'll post the audio. There's an interesting discussion over on Philocrite's blog, and he doesn't think that anything like a merger is going to be discussed.

Unitarian Universalism and Christianity


On 12 Oct, 2006 By mpm

I read Scott Well's blog, Boy in the Bands, before I get to Shawn Anthony's LoFi Tribe, so I heard about Shawn's move off of the UU path from Scott. Shawn has left the UU ministerial formation path because of his Christian faith. He left for a very different set of reasons than I did, but he left, nonetheless. Scott is on his way as well. This is, of course, nothing new. It's just yet another in a fairly long series of them. (And it certainly feels like the ranks of UU bloggers are decreasing - but I expect that more will be taking the place of those of us that have left.)

I haven't thought much about this lately, but I'm beginning to find this fascinating. Why is it that a religious movement that unarguably was Christian not so long ago is a tradition that is, in some senses, hospitable to all religious traditions except the one that spawned it?

Yes, I know, there are still some Christian UU churches, but how long will that last, now that Christian UUs have an easy out in the UCC? This seems like bleeding that won't stop.

Anyway, best of luck to you, Shawn and Scott, on your paths.

This is good


On 12 Oct, 2006 By mpm

As you know, I waver on my interest in politics, and my faith in our political system. Some days, I think it's worth thinking about, and that it might potentially be working. Other days, I think we don't have a democracy anymore.

But today is one of the days I'm thinking about it, and I came across a new Gallup Poll, which shows that the White churchgoers, which are the most faithful of Republicans, ain't so Republican anymore.

It might actually be worth staying up on election night this year. I'm betting that the Republicans are shaking in thier cowboy boots. Lets hope the Dems don't screw it up.

Much worse than Saddam


On 11 Oct, 2006 By mpm

I'm a bit slow on the uptake, because I hear this is all over the news today.

A team of American and Iraqi epidemiologists estimates that 655,000 more people have died in Iraq since coalition forces arrived in March 2003 than would have died if the invasion had not occurred.

In other words, we are worse for the Iraqi people than Saddam, at least in terms of death rates. In fact, we're more than twice as bad. Death rates in Iraq were 5.5 per 1,000 pre-invasion, and 13.3 per 1,000 post invasion.

A good effort


On 10 Oct, 2006 By mpm

The Christian Alliance for Progress is an organization I've blogged about before, and I've met at least one of the regular bloggers there. They have just started a new effort, called "Christian Values Voter's Guide" which is a good attempt (and hopefully successful) to reframe the debate about "values voters" and to really lay out what Christian values voters really should be caring about, like poverty, health care, and anti-violence. Last I read the gospels, it was these kinds of things that Jesus talked about (there is no mention of his talking about homosexuality, in case you are wondering.)

It's worth a read, and pass it around.

You might have noticed ...


On 08 Oct, 2006 By mpm

I haven't been talking much about religious topics, or about seminary. Some of you, I know are relieved. Sorry, it's only temporary. \<grin>

Anyway, basically, I'm winding down my seminary journey with two courses that are quite integrative for me. I'll probably post something on them at some point, but I'm still in integration mode with seminary, with religion and spirituality, with my relationship with God and my relationship with religious structures. I just finished an essay on some aspects of this process. It's a draft, I think, or maybe it's just one of a series. But I like it, so it's up.

Absurdity reigns supreme


On 02 Oct, 2006 By mpm

With all the brou-ha-ha happening in Washington about the Foley scandal, you might have missed this little gem:

You can buy an Uzi in Texas, but the Supreme Court just said you can't buy a sex toy shaped in a certain way there. Puleeze, can we get our priorities straight?

I could never have done it better


On 27 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Sarcasm is my favorite mode of humor, and Stephen Colbert is, I think, the king of sarcasm. In my post about the torture compromise I said I was speechless. That was speechless with indignation and distress. Colbert made me speechless with laughter about the same topic in his sketch on the issue. Watch it. It really hits that funny bone.

Is this becoming the Keith Olbermann Blog?


On 26 Sep, 2006 By mpm

First, watch this on YouTube, which is Jon Stewart on the interview of Clinton. Then, watch this:

He is good. Really good. And don't forget "Good night, and good luck."

Spirituality and Religion


On 26 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I've been thinking a lot about spirituality and religion, spirituality or religion. I have, I think, pretty good personal definitions for both terms, but I'll start with the "official" ones (both from dictionary.com)

spir·i·tu·al (sp{width="7" height="15"}r{width="4" height="22"}{width="7" height="15"}-ch{width="13" height="14"}-{width="6" height="15"}l)\ adj.

  1. Of, relating to, consisting of, or having the nature of spirit; not tangible or material. See Synonyms at immaterial.
  2. Of, concerned with, or affecting the soul.
  3. Of, from, or relating to God; deific.
  4. Of or belonging to a church or religion; sacred.
  5. Relating to or having the nature of spirits or a spirit; supernatural.

Then...

re·li·gious (r{width="7" height="15"}-l{width="7" height="15"}j{width="4" height="22"}{width="6" height="15"}s)\ adj.

  1. Having or showing belief in and reverence for God or a deity.
  2. Of, concerned with, or teaching religion: a religious text.
  3. Extremely scrupulous or conscientious: religious devotion to duty.

They are, in some ways quite similar. And they are quite different.

My own definition comes out, I think, from a relatively recent distancing of people from church, from those legions of those who are "spiritual but not religious." Spirituality is the way one is concerned with the immaterial, the intangable. Spirituality includes practice - prayer, meditation, ritual. Religion, for me, is about organizations, structures, creeds.

I have always been spiritual, but I have wandered in and out of religiosity. It feels like I am in a phase of wandering out of religiousity again. Or am I? How does calling myself a Christian change that perspective, since I am associating myself with a religion, in fact, the dominant religion of this culture. And how will that change, as I move forward, move outside of the kinds of religious organizations and structures I've moved myself into over the past few years?

I have another term I think about: devotion. What does being devout mean? How is devotion different from spirituality or religion? I've wondered if whether or not devout was a better way to describe myself, but then I get caught, because I'm not exactly clear what it is I am devoted to. It's all very slippery, isn't it?

For now, I guess I'm happy to be somewhere along some sort of spectrum of religious, spiritual, and devout. Things will form themselves later, I'm sure.\

I'm speechless


On 22 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I've been pretty out of the news loop for the last few days. I did hear, though, that Chavez' mention of Noam Chomsky's book Hegemony or Survival (which I've read, by the way, and is a very good book) sent it from an Amazon rating of 20,664 to number 1. I am beginning to have hope for the people of this country.

But, I have completely lost hope for the leadership. Apparently, through an "agreement" between the Republican leaders and the President, they neither condone, nor condemn torture done by the CIA or military, and they have given amnesty to anyone in the past that might have violated the Geneva Conventions. It prevents people who have been held (and possibly tortured) from using the Geneva Conventions to challenge their detention or treatment.

And, further, the Democrats were mostly silent, or "wary". Not even any righteous indignation. How is it that we can have one single shred of any idea that the US has any moral authority in the world? What on earth is this country supposed to be about, anyway? The kicker:

Negotiations then turned to the amount of time that a detainee's suffering must last before the treatment amounts to a war crime. Administration officials preferred designating "prolonged" mental or physical symptoms, while the senators wanted something milder. They settled on "serious and non-transitory mental harm, which need not be prolonged."

This is like debating whether or not hitting someone's thumb hard with a hammer is better or more acceptible than pulling their thumbnails out.

I can't even begin to describe how this makes me feel. No wonder Chavez called Bush the devil. As is every single Republican that agreed to this deal, and every single Democrat that remained silent.

Keith Olbermann Rocks


On 21 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Cindy ordered me to do this, so I'm doing it. Keith Olbermann did an incredible job a couple of days ago at calling Bush to task for his comments. It's an amazing commentary. Play it.

then, Cindy says:

I think that the President is so out of bounds in general and in particular with his statement that "it is unacceptable to think there is any kind of comparison between [actions of the US and of terrorists]..." that it deserves not only the apology Olbermann demands, but a gianormous turning away from sin repentance experience. What America should do with this speech/editorial/statement, over and above reading it quietly or watching Mr. Olbermanns' excellent delivery and then talking about it on blogs, at watercoolers or in grocery stores, is to do an All-American Dramatic Reading. Outloud. In public.

In fact, I think that all of America could do a simultaneous reading of this statement, in unison, church style. Our President continues to believe, being surrounded by sycophants as he is, that he not only knows best, but that he's speaking on behalf of the country.

Therefore, I call for Americans everywhere to organize and read this essay in unison as a National Call for the President to Repent and Turn from his Ways, this Sunday, September 24, at noon Eastern Time.

Sounds like a good idea to me.

Varied Tidbits


On 18 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Here's a bunch of things I came across that I think are useful, with a bit of commentary.

  • The unintended consequences of human action often provide the need for huge remediation projects. Case in point: the Mississippi River. Years and years of levee projects has caused problems for the Mississippi, and where the water would have flowed. Scientists say, apparently, that it's time to move the Mississippi.
  • This is a great list of foods you should try to eat organically, because of the amounts of pesticides used in growing them conventionally. Ooops. Too bad I didn't read this list yesterday.
  • Al Gore (why, oh why won't he run for President again?) says to tax CO2 emmisions, not payrolls. I like the idea.
  • In the Very Old News department: Acadmic institutions, not ability, hinders academic women in science and technology. Duh. I hate when some "new" report states the patently obvious (and well known for decades), and then a news organization picks it up as news. Sigh.
  • Karen Armstrong has her typically fabulous words to say about the Pope's comments on Islam.

Threat levels


On 18 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I've always thought the threat level thing was pretty bogus, and designed just to keep us scared. Well, Wired has a much better one - one that really shows the likelihoods of dying from terrorism in more realistic proportion. So, according to this, the threat level should really be "low" - as they say, "your appendix is more likely to kill you than al-Qaida is."

Threats_1{width="300" height="396"}\

Changes and a new website


On 13 Sep, 2006 By mpm

It's interesting to me how I deal with transitions in my life. I guess it's not necessarily just me - I'm sure that transitions are interesting times for many people. Certainly, they are times of both anxiety and rich learning (or, as some would say, AFGO - another f**king growth opportunity.)

I have found myself thinking a lot both about the past, and what I've done in the past - and how that is going to feed what happens in the future. And, I guess since I seem to do best with this kind of thing by concretizing it - I have finally, after ages, put up a new website. It's very incomplete - there is a huge amount of things I want to add - a lot of writing, resources I've written and gathered over the years, etc. It's been a long time coming - it's probably been 5 years since I had a substantive website. And it's been interesting to think about how a website is different than a blog. They actually aren't interchangeable.

And, in the process of developing it - it's been fascinating how everything kind of just comes together - all of those threads I've been following - the scientific ones, the technology ones, the spiritual ones, the writing, it all seems to be coming together in some sort of concrete way - although the details are still up in the air.

For our nation's safety


On 12 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Ruth got on a plane this morning, and before she left we spent some time discussing  (between giggles) the things she now could, and could not take with her. (I have posted on this topic before, but that was academic - this was dealing with it in real time.) We both decided that we wish we'd been a fly on the wall of some of these discussions, particularly the ones that decided that toothpaste and shampoo were not allowed, but "personal lubricants" were. Like, exactly what did they have in mind?

If you look at the list, it is pretty silly, and not so logical. I mean it's nice that they allow for things for people who need them, but who's to say that the next terrorist won't look at the list, and then come in a wheelchair with explosives disguised as a "gel-filled wheelchair cushion"? Or, perhaps, come with a bomb disguised as "personal lubricant"?

We decided that companies like Colgate Palmolive must have paid the government lots of money. Think about all of the business travelers who don't want to spend the time checking their luggage. They'll buy a new tube of toothpaste when they arrive at their destination, then throw it out on their way back. Maybe hotels will start to add toothpaste to the shampoo and lotion they already provide. Yuck.

But, in the end, for the good of our nation and the safety of all its citizens, she left everything, even her bottle of water, at home.

Since when did Arlen Spector get a Ph.D. in cell biology?


On 11 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I posted before about ethical issues I see with stem cell research. I think that all sorts of deep questions have to be asked about the kinds of research that is being done, and how it's being done.

However, it makes no sense whatsoever for people like Arlen Spector to be making decisions about the validity of scientific research. The implications of such research, sure - the political ramifications, of course. But the science? But, that's just what they did, according to the Washington Post.

Some blogs, of course jumped on the chance to suggest that the whole enterprise of stem cell research is overblown. I don't think so. And blogs like that aren't asking hard questions either - they are just deciding it's wrong, completely wrong. So we get polarized sides, it's wrong, or it's right, without digging deeply into the gray, which is where the answers lie.

Star Trek 40th Anniversary


On 10 Sep, 2006 By mpm

As a long time science fiction fan, and a new science fiction writer, there is no question that a very formative influence on me was Star Trek, which is celebrating it's 40th year. I watched TOS (The Original Series) as a kid with my mom, and watched each series as it came out, except for the last, Enterprise, which started around when I stopped watching TV regularly, and also I heard it wasn't great. I've seen every Star Trek movie at least once, some a number of times. I have my list of favorite episodes, and favorite movies.

On YouTube, there is a great tribute to the 40 years of Star Trek.

Anyway, happy 40th birthday, Star Trek.

"The Path to 9/11" Brouhaha


On 09 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I don't blog much about TV, because I don't watch much. But I'm blogging about something I won't be watching.

ABC will be airing a "docudrama" called The Path to 9/11, which is "a dramatization of the events detailed in The 9/11 Commission Report and other sources, in an epic miniseries event that will air with limited commercial interruption."

There has been a storm, starting in the blogosphere, about the content of this docudrama (it took the mainstream media much longer to get it - they have printed reviews with few criticisms about the content.) Apparently, right-wing journalists and bloggers got hold of the advanced copy before left-wing journalists and bloggers. Also, a Bush PR person provided information for the movie. (That must be one of the "other sources.")

There's a nice little snippet of a conversation that Bill Mahar had on his show that is a good overview on Crooks and Liars.

We could go back and forth for days about this, and in some ways, it's just picking at nits. Did Sandy Berger slam down the phone, or not? Was Clinton distracted by the Monica thing, or not? As long as the basic paradigm used to look at 9/11 is the paradigm that seems to have won the day (the "we are fighting a war on terror, and we need to do certain things, like find and kill Osama Bin Laden in order to win") these arguments are, basically, of no consequence. Deciding whose fault it was for taking or not taking some actions based on a false paradigm is an exercise in futility.

Yes, we need to protest when the media feeds us blatent lies. But this argument is beside the point. Until we can look at 9/11, and all that preceeded and followed it with a different paradigm, one that includes issues of US resource hegemony, the effects of colonialism, and the stewing mess that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been for years, we won't understand 9/11 properly.\

My Discernment Process


On 09 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Many people have asked me to talk about why I decided to leave seminary. I decided to write about it - since that appears to be my most natural form of expressing myself most recently. You can think about it as a sequel to the piece I wrote a while back about becoming a Christian. It's called "Discerning My Way Out of Seminary":

One of the words I will leave seminary with that I didn't have when I got here is "discernment." Discernment is a great word. It's a much better way to describe an organic, unpredictable process than, for instance "deciding." I didn't really "decide" to come to seminary. In one sense, of course, every step along the way between first hearing "the call" and coming to seminary, then, most recently, deciding to leave seminary, was a decision. But the word "decision" has a two-dimensionality to it. "Discernment" seems to enclose in it a richness, depth, and dimensionality that speaks to the unpredictability of the process.

Read the whole thing here. I hope you enjoy it.

They shoot doves, don't they?


On 07 Sep, 2006 By mpm

This is a new one on me, for sure. As someone who has always thought hunting for anything other reason except for food as barbaric, the idea of shooting doves seems, well, uncivilized. Boing Boing had this post about a "Dove Shoot" which is supposed to be a fundraiser for a Republican candidate in South Carolina.

It does seem especially appropriate for Republicans to be shooting the symbol of peace on 9/11.

Great Reminder


On 06 Sep, 2006 By mpm

I just came across a great post in an interesting blo I hadn't read before, called How to Save the World. The post, an article about "Saying no to important tasks" was a great read, and a great reminder as I transition both back to school, and back to doing some of the kinds of things I was doing before I started school.

The problem was, despite my best intentions, the urgent stuff kept getting moved up and the important stuff moved down. At the end of every day I was deleting completed tasks in italics, adding new urgent tasks, and, with a sigh, rescheduling tasks in bold to later dates.

Since my stress-induced disease hit me and woke me up, I'm not doing that any more. In fact, I've declared war on quadrant 3 (and 4) tasks: [They don't get put on the list at all]{style="font-style: italic;"}.

The article is a great read for those of us who are chronically overcommitted.

Past visions of the future, and YouTube


On 03 Sep, 2006 By mpm

Since I've been a science fiction fan since I was a kid, visions of the future have been part and parcel of my imagination for a long time. And to my mind, the 1950s and 60s visions of the future were pretty interesting. Surprisingly realistic, but also way off the mark, at the same time.

Case in point: a 1960s commercial about Supersonic plane travel by Braniff Airlines. It's pretty amazing in how optimistic they were (they were, apparently, talking about how things would be in the 70s,) and how prescient (there is a line about "a friendly computer that knows more about you than you do"!)

The video is up on YouTube, which I don't think I've blogged about it before. It is, primarily, a good time waster. But sometimes, I find links to videos (like this one) that are on one of a few video hosting sites, like YouTube and Google Video.

Karen Armstrong


On 31 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I know that some historians think that she doesn't do history properly, but I have always liked Karen Armstrong's books. She seems to have a breadth of view that is expansive, and incorporates a lot of different ideas and perspectives.

The Guardian (UK Newspaper and Website) has a column by her just about every week. (They even have a Karen Armstrong RSS feed. How cool is that?) This week, her column is about the contradictory narratives of global politics. It's really good.

We must, therefore, make a concerted attempt to listen critically to all the stories out there in order to gain a more panoptic vision. This includes our own cultural narrative. Our modernity has liberated many of us, but it has disenfranchised others. Counter-narratives that question the myth of western freedom must also be heard, because they represent a crucial element in the conflicted, tragic whole.

Blog changes


On 31 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Well, life changes, things change, so, well, my blogs will change. I've had three blogs since I've been blogging, this main blog, which I've basically had for three years, the technology desk, which I had for about 3 months, which I killed because I realized I couldn't maintain it in seminary, and my ministry blog (The Contemplative and the Mystic), which has been going for more than a year.

So what's the next blog configuration? My main blog has always reflected the broad range of issues I'm interested in. The ancillary blogs have been specific, for specific purposes. I think that will continue. I'll have a main blog, and I'll spin off a couple of blogs that reflect specific interests that I want to delve into more deeply. I'll be doing a lot of writing in the next year or so, as that, I think, for now, will be a major focus for me. I will leave alive, but not maintain, the ministry blog (I have found, over the past couple of months, I've had less and less to say, although that may well change.)

I am resurrecting the technology blog, and calling it Zen and the Art of Nonprofit Technology. The subtitle is "Conscious, minimalist, neo-luddite perspectives on nonprofit technology." The first post will give you some ideas on what it's going to be about.

Stay tuned for other updates.

Creating a life, part II


On 28 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Not so long ago, I said that changes were afoot. I feel finally ready to blog about the most recent results of a process that I've been going through for the past few weeks or so. This is just another leg of the journey I started over two years ago, in my decision to go to seminary. Which, of course, is part of my lifelong journey of creating a life that is fulfilling, of service, and full of spirit.

A few weeks ago, on my other blog, I posted something about discernment. I was, at the time, in this place of not knowing, which I have become quite familiar with over the past couple of years. Knowing I wanted to center my life more on the spiritual journey, but not knowing how. Knowing I wanted to go to seminary, but not knowing where to go. Not knowing what kind of ministry I felt called to do.

One of the things that's true about really sitting with that feeling of not knowing, getting comfortable with it, really letting it sink in, is that, actually, knowing comes, slowly, surprisingly, and unexpectedly. I have learned that I have a somewhat unusual process of discernment. Things kind of bubble under the surface, percolating, marinating, processing, then, in a bit of a rush, it all comes out, somewhat fully formed. Feels like a birth, in some ways, because it can be painful.

What I gave birth to this month was the knowing that my path has taken a turn in another direction. I came to realize that the kind of vocational life I would be preparing myself for here, in seminary, was a vocational life I didn't want to pursue. Which, in a practical sense, meant it didn't make sense to continue to go to seminary.

The result is that this will be my last semester in seminary. I'll be taking some courses that combine some old and new interests of mine (more on those later) instead of the MDiv curriculum. I'll emerge from PSR with a Certificate in Theological Studies, which is something I can hang on a wall, I guess.

And, the truth is, I feel clear and happy. I'm back in a place of not knowing, again, and things will be taking shape slowly. There are the usual practical realities to deal with, the new things to think about, and create. There are the dreams to try out, and maybe fail at.

I simply continue on the path. A spiritual teacher of mine said, "If you accept the challenge of your life, and embrace it -- if you live it out fully, bringing yourself to the tasks at hand with all the depth of courage, wisdom, spirit and heart you can find within yourself -- then you will serve life." That's the path.

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert


On 28 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I didn't watch the Emmys, well, because I don't watch television. But due to the wonders of the web, I did see Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart do a hilarious skit at the Emmys.

More data to chew on


On 27 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I love the Pew Research Center. They provide such great data on people's ideas and attitudes. They are a real reality check on what we think is going on in this country. So anyway, the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press just released a new study on the relationship between religion and politics.

There is a lot to chew on, here. First, as they say, the Democrats have a "God problem." 69% of the people in their study feel that liberals have gone too far to remove religion from schools and government. 62% of people think that the Democratic party is neutral or unfriendly to religion, whereas 41% think Republicans are neutral or unfriendly to religion.

Interestingly, 49% of people feel that conservative Christians have gone too far in imposing their moral views on the country. Also, 63% of the people think that the American people should have more influence over laws than the Bible. However, almost one third of people in this survey (32%) think that the Bible should have more influence over laws than the people of the country. This is a pretty large percentage of people. 67% of people surveyed think of the US as a Christian country.

Other interesting findings (especially to me): a small majority (51%) of people think that live evolved, and were not created, although 21% thought that evolution occured via divine guidance rather than natural selection. I will say, that question bothered the heck out of me. They aren't mutually exclusive options, and to ask it that way oversimplifies the whole question about evolution and "divine guidance." But that's my bias.

There is some interesting data on attitudes about global climate change, the second coming of Christ, and other issues. It's really worth a read. There is, I think, both things that are worth looking at if one is, for instance, a Democrat wanting to win an election. And I am continually surprised, for some reason, at how different I, and the people I know, are from the mainstream. That's what I get for being a pinko lesbian, I guess.\

Stem cells


On 26 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Interestingly enough, although I've read a fair bit about stem cells, and, even a long time ago, taught a section of a course on the possible use of stem cells for particular kinds of neurological problems, I haven't blogged about them yet.

Why I'm writing about them today is that there was a new kind of technique that has been shown to work, which is using early blastocysts (at the eight-cell stage) and taking out one of the cells, and using that as a source for the totipotent or pluripotent (meaning can produce just about any kind of cell) stem cell lines that can be used for research and therapy. The rest of the cells continue to develop, and form a viable embryo. This technique had been used to test embryos generated by In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for genetic defects. Why this is significant is that it means that the embryo is not destroyed, which has been true for the creation of other kinds of stem cell lines. This should mean that those for whom stem cell production was problematic because of their pro-life stance, that this would be ending a life. And, thus, the idea is that this should change the administration's stance on funding stem cell research. However, some groups, such as Catholics, reject IVF, and thus, would reject this as a valid solution to the stem cell debate.

Part of the reason that some groups reject IVF is that most embryos created with IVF don't end up getting implanted, for a variety of reasons. So according to some, this means multiple lives lost. As someone who thinks that a reasonable perspective on when life begins might be when a fetus is viable outside the womb, this doesn't especially bother me.

But there is, of course, an underlying set of questions and issues that really do interest me. That is, what kinds of technologies are we willing to use and try on human biological material in the service of healing and/or physical improvements? Already, the line between procedures that are considered therapeutic, and the procedures considered cosmetic are getting blurred. So where will we draw the line? Should we even draw a line? Does it matter at all?

One of the hallmark truths about human beings is that, for quite some time now, particularly since the first use of a nuclear bomb in 1945, our reach has far exceeded our grasp. One of the purposes of religious communities is to help us better grasp what we are doing, and why we are doing it. Do I agree with people who are against stem cell research because it destroys embryos? No. But I do think that we should start thinking fast, or, perhaps, slow down the pace, so we can catch up with ourselves. Otherwise, we are likely to be pretty sorry later.

Nine Eight planets


On 24 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I had a book as a kid which I think I read at least five times. It was called "Nine Planets" (probably this one.) It had a chapter on each planet, and lots of good information. Well, there are now only eight planets, Pluto was given the axe, and demoted from planethood. The proposal that I talked about in my earlier post didn't fly.

Creating worlds, creating a life


On 23 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I've always considered myself creative, even though I don't consider myself an artist, per se. I spent a lot of my childhood creating worlds in my head, at the same time as I read countless creations of worlds done by many science fiction writers. This summer, I became a world creator. I have created a new sci-fi universe, and finished a novel based in it. It was one of the most amazingly fun things I've done in a long time. I got to explore in depth a variety of issues that I think are important in the world, and have fun creating characters, plot, and new worlds. I have no idea what will come of it. But it was a lot of fun doing it. i don't know if it's worth publishing, but I have some friends who are giving me some advice about it. One of the areas of creativity that I have is in making the active, outward manifestations of my life, including my work, more and more consonant with my highest self, what could, I guess, be described as an inner manifestation of God. I started a new stage in that process a couple of years ago, when I first decided to go to seminary. That process continues. I'll have a lot more to say in the next few weeks about some new twists and turns in that process. There are some changes afoot.

Silly Secrecy?


On 20 Aug, 2006 By mpm

It turns out that the Bush administration is moving to reclassify information that has not been classified before. What kind of information? Historical information about how many different kinds of strategic nuclear missles we used to have. For example:

In a 1971 appearance before the House Armed Services Committee, forinstance, Defense Secretary Melvin R. Laird offered a toaster-shapedchart showing, among other things, that the United States had 30strategic bomber squadrons, 54 Titan intercontinental ballisticmissiles and 1,000 Minuteman missiles.

Those numbers, [made public on March 9, 1971, are redacted in a copy of the chart obtained by the archive's researchers in January]{.underline} as part of a declassified government history of the U.S. air and missile defense system, according to archive officials. [emphasis mine]\

OK, so, outdated information that is useful to no one except historians is now being classified. Several people in this article call this "silly secrecy." Or is it something else entirely?

In general, what's true is that we can only keep tabs on the kinds of things our government is doing with information about it. I don't think that this actual information means anything to them. I think what is important to them is to continually reduce the amount of information available to the people of this country. This is just another symptom of a diseased government. One that seems to continue to want to ignore that it is sick. And, of course, the real people who suffer from this disease is us.\

What part of separation of powers doesn't he understand? Oh, right, all of it.


On 18 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Bush today, very predictably, denounced the federal court ruling that the NSA spying program was unconstitutional, saying:

"This country of ours is at war," Bush said. "And we must give those whose responsibility it is to protect the United States the tools necessary to protect this country in a time of war."

It's his responsibility to follow the constitution, and follow the court's rulings about it, not to give it the finger.

Nine? Eight? Twelve?


On 16 Aug, 2006 By mpm

So, how many planets are there, really? Pluto, as some of you might know, has been fighting a valiant battle to actually remain in the group of nine planets. A proposal to be hashed out this week would reclassify it as a "pluton" - a small, outer solar system object, but not one of the 8 classical inner planets. And, 3 other plutons are promoted with it - so now there are 12 planets.

Under the long-awaited proposal, Pluto would remain in the pantheon ofplanets by becoming the prototype of a new subcategory of small, outersolar system objects dubbed "plutons" -- planets, but distinct from theeight larger "classical" planets closer to the sun.

The changes would require astronomy textbooks to be rewritten and everyschoolchild to be taught a new vision of the solar system, becausethree other orbs would get promoted to planet status, as well --expanding the total from the traditional nine to 12.

And, apparently, this new definition is good not only in our solar system, but everywhere.

The Liquids Thing


On 11 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Luckily, I am not flying anytime soon. I was cooking dinner last night, and listening to the news. I hadn't actually been keeping very close track on much of anything in the last few days. So I find out about the people the Brits arrested for plotting to blow up planes. The plan was to blow up the planes with liquids, which, apparently, is a threat that has been known about for years. So, now they are banning liquids on planes? Smell anything fishy here?

Further, it turns out, that when the TSA people get banned liquids, they dump them into garbage cans in the airport, or give them to homeless shelters!! Um, weren't they possibly explosives? Why take them in the first place?\

I think we can safely assume this is has nothing actually to do with passenger safety, and everything to do with continuing to make people in this country afraid of something that is less likely to kill them than a lightening strike, and that we are increasing the likelihood by our actions in the Middle East. And, Bush acted fast, so he must be doing something.

Time to wake up.  

Friday Cat Blogging


On 11 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I don't have any cats at the moment, but I'm borrowing my SO's for one friday. He's cute. His name is Cielito Lindo.\ Dsc00452{width="350" height="262"}

Say it ain't so, Joe!


On 08 Aug, 2006 By mpm

I never liked Joe Lieberman. I didn't like his positions on most things, and I hated that he supported Bush around the Iraq war. I thought that he liked his job in the Senate too much when he decided to run for Senate at the same time as he was the VP candidate in 2000. Well, I guess he likes his job way more than he likes his party. He lost the Democratic primary to Ned Lamont and now he is going to run as an independent. Which, of course, means he will split the votes, and make it more likely that the Republican will win. Thanks a whole lot, Joe. Oh, and apparently, his site was hacked.

Update: er, no, not hacked, clueless.\

The Albany Bulb


On 08 Aug, 2006 By mpm

My SO took me to the Albany Bulb, which is a wonderful place I hadn't heard of until she told me about it. It's an undeveloped little spit of land that sticks out into the bay in Albany, which is the town just north of Berkeley. Lots of artists have made scuptures and paintings there. It's a great place to explore. There apparently has been a fair bit of controversy about it, and supposedly some officials want to make it a more manicured kind of place. A Google search of "Albany Bulb"\ shows a lot of sites, alot of people write about it, and take photos.

Unfortunately, I forgot to take my camera, so I'll let others on flickr show you what the bulb is like. But here's a Google satellite view:

Picture_1_4{width="350" height="222"}

Blog worthy](/2006/08/05/blog-worthy)


On 05 Aug, 2006 By mpm With 5 Comments

Personal happenings and goings on in my life rarely make it into this blog for a couple of reasons. First, this is not really meant to be a livejournal or myspace sort of blog tell all about my life, or what I ate for breakfast. Usually the personal items happen when I move or travel. I do like to talk about my geographic location if it isn't home.

Today, I am, for the first time, going to break that pattern. I'm going to tell you what I ate for breakfast. I had a cinnamon roll. Not just any cinnamon roll, mind you. It was a cinnamon roll from a gourmet grocery store in San Francisco. You might ask, why is this important? Why is this blog worthy?

It's blog worthy because it was a cinnamon roll, with some birthday candles on it. Yes, it's my birthday today. But there's more. The birthday candles were arranged, and the cinnamon roll purchased, by the person named in varied recent blog posts as my significant other. My significant other, whose name, by the way, is Ruth, is the most amazing person I've ever met. (She was the one, by the way, that helped me rename this blog.) And I am so incredibly happy (and have been, actually for a few months now). So, I've been having a very, very happy birthday!\

Back to our regularly scheduled programming of religion, politics, the environment and seminary.\

Something I didn't know


On 03 Aug, 2006 By mpm

Today, one of my favorite organizations, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life (because I love data, if you hadn't figured that out already) came out with an interesting new study. It's worth a look. They looked at the "hotbutton" social issues of our time, such as abortion, stem cell research, and gay marriage. What they found is, in some ways unsurprisingly, that most Americans are pretty middle-of-the-road about those issues.

Interestingly enough, something that I hadn't known, is that there is no gender gap when it comes to people's opinions on the availability of abortion. I just hadn't known that (which is surprising to me, since I thought I knew a lot about that issue.) Also, 66% of Americans thought that we had to find some middle ground on abortion, and only 29% felt there was no room for comprimise. I imagine that 29% is divided in some way between those who are pro-choice, and those who are pro-life. Who knows.\

There is also some interesting data about where people think homosexuality comes from. Interestingly enough, Black protestants are more conservative than White evangelicals on the question of birth vs. choice, and whether or not homosexuality is changable. I wonder why this is.\

Anyway, all of this taken together is more evidence that I think the religious right has probably gone as far as it will be able to ever go on these hot button issues. And, given the varied reporting in the news and blogosphere, I think that it's getting really close to the point where we can say that they reached their peak, and they are fading. Yay!\

New Room


On 31 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I haven't had much time to write blog entries today, or will I tomorrow, because I'm moving. I became the house manager for my dorm, called Benton, and because of that I get this cool new room that is way bigger than my old room, and looks out on the Bay! Cool! Sunsets every evening!

Moving is a hassle, of course, but it will be over soon, and I'll be in my new room. That will be nice.

Anyway, there are some flickr photos of the room (procrastination from moving.)

Catholic Women Priests


On 30 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I heard about this in an announcement in church this morning, then saw it in a Salon article. In Pittsburg, a number of women are going to be ordained as priests.

Declaring herself "present" (in Latin, ad sum), each of the 12will be ordained priests or deacons by women bishops -- themselvessecretly ordained to the episcopacy by active Roman Catholic malebishops whose names will remain locked in a vault until they die.

There is an active movement, called womenpriests, who are risking excommunication (a big deal for Catholics) in order to move forward, and ask the question about why women can't be ordained into the Catholic priesthood.

By their visibility and accessibility, a small band of women areforcing a confrontation. They are asking, Is sexism a sin? How does thechurch reconcile its teaching that women and men are created in God'simage, that once baptized, there is "no male or female" and "all areone in Christ Jesus," with its contention that women cannot representthe ultimate sacred or hold ultimate power through ordination becausethey are, literally, the wrong "substance"?

Anyway, this is going to be interesting to watch. And it is certainly an article worth reading.

Gay Marriage


On 30 Jul, 2006 By mpm

As you know, I don't comment a whole lot on the gay marriage issue, for a variety of reasons. However, there is an op-ed in todays New York Times by Dan Savage, about the recent court decisions in Washington State and New York, that is just amazing. Salient quotes:

In New York, the court ruled in effect that irresponsible heterosexuals often have children by accident --- we gay couples, in contrast, cannot get drunk and adopt in one night --- so the state can reserve marriage rights for heterosexuals in order to coerce them into taking care of their offspring. Without the promise of gift registries and rehearsal dinners, it seems, many more newborns in New York would be found in trash cans.

and ...

These defeats have demoralized supporters of gay marriage, but I see a silver lining. If heterosexual instability and the link between heterosexual sex and human reproduction are the best arguments opponents of same-sex marriage can muster, I can't help but feel that our side must be winning. Insulting heterosexuals and discriminating against children with same-sex parents may score the other side a few runs, but these strategies won't win the game.

Anyway, it has Dan Savage's signature humor, and a lot of good points.

Oil and Water


On 29 Jul, 2006 By mpm

As the events of Israel's war in Lebanon, as well as the US war in Iraq, and interest in Iran and Syria play out, and the rhetoric of "war on terror", or "sectarian violence" get bandied about by just about everyone, it is critically important that we understand something. The major underlying factor in all of this, really, is the conflict for dwindling, but essential resources.

Michael Klare, in the not-so-new-anymore book Resource Wars, talks about this issue much more cogently and in detail than I could. But I think it's worth talking about here, given the present situation.

Most of us take both oil and water (less so oil these days) for granted. We fill up our gas tanks (and, perhaps lately, cringe) and we drink our water from the tap or the bottle. But we don't often think much about were it came from, and what had to happen in order for us to get it.

All lefties know that protest cry "no blood for oil" - we have understood for a long time that the US interests in the MIddle East are about oil, and easy access to oil. There is a good article in Energy Bulletin this week about the relationship between the war in Lebanon and oil. I think that most of us understand that Condi's "birth pangs of a new Middle East" are about a Middle East that the west (US in particular) can control, in one way or another, so that it's rich oil resources will be available for us.

Less known is the issue of water. There have been conflicts between Israel and Lebanon over water for years. MyDD asks some very pointed questions about this issue, and I'd have to concur with their point of view. There is a great page on mideastweb that talks about this issue as well. MyDD asks about the relative use of water by Israel and the surrounding countries, as well as the Palestinians. I can't answer this question specifically, I think that would take a lot of research, but I did find a really cool database of the Land and Water Development Division of the FAO (Food and Agriculture organization) of the United Nations (thank God that we have the United Nations.) Anyway, here are some interesting cogent facts from that database. (If you are a data analysis fan, play with it, it is really amazing.)

Israel has had a mean population density of 280.6 inhabitants per square kilometer over the course of 1995-2005. Lebanon has had a density of 341.5 inhab/square km for that same time period. However, Israel has drawn an average of 76.65 % of it's available renewable water resources, while Lebanon has drawn 20.37%.  (Israel has a GDP of 123,526 million USD, and Lebanon has a GDP of 22,052 million USD) In the end, it's all back to issues of how we live our lives. We can't escape that a lifestyle (like we, or Israel live) creates stresses on our environment and resources that cannot be sustained, and, in the end, will cause war and suffering.

Unless people start talking plainly about how the resource-intensive western lifestyle directly and indirectly causes many of the problems we are seeing in our world today we will keep going around and around issues of "terrorism" and "sectarian violence" and this and that, and ignore the elephant in the room.

Children die in war


On 27 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I have been watching what has been happening in the Middle East with real sadness. I sat across a cafe table with a friend of mine with tears in her eyes. It is heartbreaking, from the children being killed, to the effects it has on people from a distance.

This crisis is, in some ways, thousands of years in the making. But it is also very much a product of a troubling combination of neoconservative viewpoints about Middle Eastern hegemony, and an  apocalyptic Christian worldview that sees this conflict as inevitable.

All the while, children die.

Oil Sands


On 27 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Some say that the oil sands in Canada will be an answer to our dependence on Middle Eastern oil. It appears that this could be true, but at an enormous environmental cost. That link above to the Wikipedia article details some of the issues, and a new article in Energy Bulletin (something anyone who is at all interested in energy issues should read) is pretty damning.

The mining-extraction process requires about 750 cubic feet of natural gas for every barrel of bitumen, according to the non-governmental Pembina Institute report "Oil Sands Fever". The "in situ" process that pumps super-hot steam 1,000 metres underground requires 1,500 cubic feet of natural gas to produce a single barrel of oil.

This doesn't sound like such a good equation. Add to that issues of the toxic waste produced in the process of extracting the oil, and this is really, really not a good idea.

Interesting Blog


On 25 Jul, 2006 By mpm

In the interest of learning more, and dialogue, I tend to read one or two Christian-oriented blogs that are more conservative than I am. I tend not to go the Jesus Politics route, so I don't read people like Al Mohler very often (because doing that so stretches my ability to follow my 4 guidelines.)  But I did happen upon a blog that is part of Christianity Today, which is a conservative evangelical magazine (I think probably the most popular one.) It is called "Out of Ur."

They are having fascinating discussions about whether or not conservative politics are a barrier to the gospel and, interestingly, whether or not consumerism undermines Christian faith. That post says:

When we approach Christianity as consumers rather than seeing it as a comprehensive way of life, an interpretive set of beliefs and values, Christianity becomes just one more brand we consume along with Gap, Apple, and Starbucks to express identity. And the demotion of Jesus Christ from Lord to label means to live as a Christian no longer carries an expectation of obedience and good works, but rather the perpetual consumption of Christian merchandise and experiences---music, books, t-shirts, conferences, and jewelry.

No, I wouldn't put it that way, of course, but she's got something there. It seems that in this country, we do a lot of that with spirituality in general - it becomes something to consume, a brand to identify with, not something to live.\

I am really interested that they are having these conversations.\

Hat tip to The Corner, who liked my sermon.

Hitting 10,000 and the naming fairy


On 25 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I've finally done it. In a bit over a year, I've had more than 10,000 page views (actually, it now stands at 10,172.) Somehow, that feels like somewhat of a milestone. I still enjoy writing the blog, and still feel gratified when I hear that someone reads it, and likes what I write, so I'll hope for another 10,000 this coming year.

However, since I came back from a conference full of bloggers, I'm feeling a bit of name envy, to be completely honest. For those of you that don't know the history of the name of this blog, I might as well tell it. My middle name is Pearl, named after my father's mother, who I never met, because she died before I was born. Sometime along the way in my spiritual explorations, I gained an animal familiar, the bear. Five gazillion internet years ago, before AOL was connected to the internet (I think this was 1992 or 1993), I needed to come up with a screen name for my new AOL account. Pearlbear it was. That long ago discarded screen name has followed me in many internet contexts. I've used it as an email address now and again, I've used it in varied bulletin boards, it's my IRC nick, and, when it came time to start a blog, since I started the blog out as semi-anonymous (it stopped being that very soon after I started) it seemed appropriate to name it "Pearlbear's Blog."

The real truth of the matter is that the naming fairy skipped right over my house when she was giving out the gift of clever naming. Clearly, Hoarded Ordinaries, Islamicate, Xpatriated Texan, and Velveteen Rabbi, and my friend Trailer Full of Tunes, to name just a very few, got the gift that I didn't. But, I have decided that if I'm going to be a serious blogger, this blog needs a new name.

I have already renamed my "Ministry Blog" "The Contemplative and Mystic" (see, really, the naming fairy just skipped right over me!) But I need a new name for this one. I'm still mulling it over, but if you have any suggestions, feel free to comment (or send them along in email if you're shy.)

California, coming home


On 25 Jul, 2006 By mpm

That's a line from a Joni Mitchell song, which we listened to as we rolled over the Sierras yesterday evening. I'm back in the Bay area again, after 6 weeks away. For a variety of reasons, the blogging and the picture taking from this leg of the trip is a lot lighter than on the other leg. There will be some pictures up, but that will have to wait for a bit.

Some snippets since I last blogged: We took a lot of back roads, stopped at many bodies of water. We stayed in Grand Island, NE, where I have stayed at least twice before. We drove past my old house in Poudre Canyon, CO, stayed at a funky place with cabins on the Western Slope that had "bucks" and "does" to indicate the men's and women's bathrooms. The cabin we stayed in had a stuffed squirrel on the wall, and dear antlers for door handles. We stayed in Wendover Nevada, in a really luxurious room for really, really cheap, letting the gamblers subsidize us. We ate lunch at a chinese restaurant in Reno, while we watched the gamblers walk from casino to casino.

I'm digesting a lot of things, both big and small, inner and outer. I have a month before things start in earnest, and I'm looking forward to some time to write, digest, and just be.

Israel and Lebanon


On 21 Jul, 2006 By mpm

One of the weird things about travelling cross country with someone else that doesn't watch TV is that you hear about the things happening in the world through either brief looks at news on the web, or a background TV in a restaurant or truck stop. The invasion by Israel of Lebanon was hard for me to believe at first. I heard a little snippet at a restaurant last weekend when I was in New Jersey, but I figured I was mis-hearing. It turns out, I wasn't mishearing at all.

And it keeps getting worse. And worse yet, our president thinks that this might be a good part of the war on terror. So instead of every president in previous history, who, when violence has escalated in the Middle East, flew into diplomacy mode, and tried to call for cease-fires and talks between the sides, Bush is seemingly cheering the Israeli government on. Here's a salient quote from the Washington Post:

Many Mideast experts warn that there is a dangerous consequence to this worldview. They believe that Israel, and the United States by extension, is risking serious trouble if it continues with the punishing air strikes that are producing mounting casualties. The history of the Middle East is replete with examples of the limits of military power, they say, noting how the Israeli campaign in Lebanon in the early 1980s helped create the conditions for the rise of Hezbollah.

This is bad news, all around. Many, many civilians (including children) are being killed, and their lives and towns ruined, because of this dangerous worldview. November is becoming one of the most important political seasons in the past 50 years or so. We've got to get congress back, and we have to take off these Christian Apocalyptic glasses Bush is wearing.

"I guess we'll get to see more corn today"


On 21 Jul, 2006 By mpm

That was my SO's comment about Iowa, in the middle of a sea of corn that started in Ohio. It was very funny, but I guess you had to have been there. We took a "scenic" road through Illinois, which actually was nicer than the highway, but it was corn, followed by towns, followed by more corn. Don't get me wrong, I like watching corn grow. It just completely amazes me sometimes how much corn there is in this country.

It's been a slow, wonderful trip. We're in Iowa now, and I imagine we'll see Nebraska today.

Vermillion, Ohio


On 19 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I'm in an ice cream/coffee shop in Vermillion, Ohio, which is about 40 miles west of Cleveland. We got to Cleveland, the town I lived in for 6 years in the 80s, and my SO lived for two years much more recently. We went to the West Side Market, and got a lot of great fruit and vegetables for the trip. We spent some time in Edgewater Park, hanging out by the lake. We spent last night in Ithaca, NY, a town both of us had been to at one point or another in our lives.

It's a leisurely trip, with lots of side roads and excursions, so far in territory one or another of us, or both, know well. I expect we will stay in Ohio somewhere tonight. I have taken some pictures, but flickr is down (which is why the photo montage on the right isn't showing, so it will be a while before they get up.

The soundtrack for the trip today has been Over the Rhine (who have a great song, called, appropriately enough, "Ohio",) the Indigo Girls, Jack Johnson, Queer as Folk soundtrack, and Iron and Wine (SO's CD that I have to get a hold of, it's wonderful.)

Who knows when I'll be blogging next. Indiana? Illinois? Iowa where the rest stops have wifi?\

Summer Travel: last stage


On 17 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Note - If I were on livejournal, which I am not, there would be a short line at the top of this post, reading: Current mood: just simply wonderful

I'm sitting in yet another cafe with free wireless, called Java Madness, in Wakefield, RI. Rhode Island, you say, why is Michelle in Rhode Island? I thought she was in New Jersey! I'm in Rhode Island because my significant other has been here for about a week and a half. She and I are driving back to the Bay Area starting tomorrow morning. We don't really know which way we are going, and we don't really know how long it's going to take. And, as usual with cross-country drives, who knows when I'll get net access - could be everyday, could be only once in a while (like in Iowa.) I'll check in here when I can, and I might even have some interesting pictures to share on flickr, at some point.

Progressive Faith Blog Con Final Comments


On 17 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I wanted to both wrap up my own feelings about the Blog Con, and also link to some other blogs that have summarized their experiences. It was a really great weekend. It was nice meeting so many people I'd emailed, phoned, or just read their blogs. It was nice to put faces and three-dimensional personalities to the blogs I've been reading, some over the course of more than a year.

The con was a really interesting, and I think, compelling combination of experiences and discussions of both faith and politics. Some of the participants seemed more oriented toward politics, some more oriented toward faith, but there was no conflict - we discussed both in depth, and also there were the four worship experiences, which were powerful (and, as Rabbi Arthur said, something you are not supposed to do in an interfaith setting.)

We came to an understanding, I think, of the ways in which we can be unified, while still being diverse, and focused on different aspects of the same larger questions. We expect to meet again next year, possibly on the west coast. I said that it was possible that a certain institution that I am a part of would be happy to host this sort of thing, given their focus on progressive faith, and interest the blogosphere (president of said institution is known to read this blog - hint, hint.) We also had some ideas for how to move our community of progressive faith bloggers forward. Stay tuned for more info on that.

I want to publicly thank everyone who was at all involved in making the blog con happen, and everyone who was there, who made it a great experience.

Here are some summary comments from participants:

Shanta, of the National Council of Churches (who I unfortunately did not get to meet,) talks briefly about his experience. Velveteen Rabbi has a great set of links to go through for comments and summaries of the events. Rabbi Jill Jacobs has a wrap up on JSpot. Mata H, one of my Christian worship compatriots, has this wrap up. Islam O. Yankee, of Islamicate, gives his thanks. Check the Progressive Faith Blog Con site for more wrap and ongoing posts on what's happened because of the con.\

Blog Con Sunday Service


On 17 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Chris Tessone (Even the Devils Believe,) Mata H (Time's Fool,) Bruce Prescott (Mainstream Baptist) and I put together and led a Sunday Christian worship service for the blog con. The order of service is available in PDF format, and I've just posted the sermon on my Ministry Blog.

It was a really wonderful experience. Chris was stuck in Paris (poor guy) and so Bruce bravely and wonderfully took over being the celebrant for Eucharist. It was an amazing combination of traditions, from Chris' Independent Catholic, Mata H's Lutheran, my UCC/MCC combo, and Bruce's Baptist. It was almost the complete range from high to low church. We did the service in a circle, and the intention was to have it as open to all faith traditions as possible. And, from some comments we've gotten, it worked well.

It was wonderful designing and leading a worship service in a truly interfaith context. I hope to be able to do it again sometime.

Progressive Faith Blog Con: Saturday Evening Panel


On 15 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Question posed: What is progressive faith?

Pastor Dan (Street Prophets): Separation of church and state. Heterodox beliefs, such as Unitarian Universalists, for instance. But Dan is an orthodox Christian. Many are orthodox within our traditions, even if we consider ourselves progressive. Also, using the term can be a target for conservatives. "Goddess worshipping hippie tree hugging" whatever - easy to dismiss. Also, another criticism is that they are dying out, or failing, not succesful spiritually, so why should we pay attention to them socially. Also, can be seen as a counterweight, or another version of the religious right. But that's not something we are interested in. Another question - can we be like the religious right? There is nothing like the machine of the religious right - but we're not going to be like it. Nothing like the Christian Coalition will appear on the left anytime soon. We need to ask ourselves whether or not we want to be like the religious right - they are an interest group within the Republican party. And they have pretty much failed. A bit of progress on the courts and abortion laws in the states, otherwise, nothing. So if we follow the same model, we will fail the same way. It is in the interest of the party to keep us motivated without delivering. Is our progressive faith about politics, or about faith? Is it faithful to live out our faith entirely through the stances we take in politics? It is an open question.  We can work across boundaries in our society in ways that the right can't do. In forming alliances with progressive Jews and Muslims, we can work together in ways they can't. What defines us as progressive believers is not a particular platform or faith, but a willingness to engage in politics and faith together.

Bruce Prescott (Mainstream Baptist - his talk is on his blog): he began with the assumption that you separate church and state to keep religion and the government apart, but working to create a common good. Religion as prophetic, more than anything. Consciencious (forms of the golden rule), chastened (sorrowfully acknowledges the pain and suffering that the community has inflicted on others - recognizing the shortcomings of your faith in regards to other faiths), hopeful (has sympathetic and creative hope to overcome the present and create a better future,) strong (strong enough to demand equal rights for those who differ - faith has to overcome it's fears of difference,) humble (recognizes the fallability of humanity, and communication between people falls short of full comprehensibility - infallability is an attribute that is best left for the divine,) growing (expanding, striving for depth, never satisfied by it's progress, never arrived,) questioning (undaunted by critical thought - not required to sacrifice their intellect - the hermeneutic of suspicion - welcomes doubt and encourages questions,) dialogical (extends itself by random acts of kindness and compassion - refuses to extend itself by force or force of arms,) active (more than lipservice to love - put itself at risk by publicly opposing injustice,) and interdependent (affirms the interdependence of all life on the planet, and the dependence of the future generations on us.)

Rabbi Arthur (Shalom Center): Doesn't like the term progressive, prefers prophetic. Prophetic is based in all three abrahamic traditions. And it is clear about our relationship to power. The re-emergence of prophetic voice in the united states now is a part of a spiral of prophecy over the years, and is directly related to God - an aspect of God. In history - and evolution - the lesson is when you control the environment, you fail and die. Part of living is stepping back from that, and letting other organisms participate in a dance with you. Book called Ecology of Eden suggests that the emergence of Israel (a small band of hunter gatherers) from the Sumerian agricultural system Israel danced with the new power, and integrate some of it into their tradition. Shabbat and the sabbatical year emerged from the understanding that they would have to become like Sumaria for 6 days, but the 7th day we'll act like the hunter gatherers that we used to be. Next big phase was hellenization. Some said they would stay the same (Samaritans) and some learned what might be sacred in the way the Hellenists behave, and integrated it into their tradition. Rabbinic Judaism and Christianity emerged from that. New forms of community. We are living through just such an event. Modernity is playing the same role as the Roman empire - some choose to say that modernity has shattered it - they discard it. Other response is prophetic religious renewal. That one asks - what is it in modernity that is "God worthy" - equality of women and men, legitimacy of different sexualities, stewardship of the environment, affirming that there is something holy in each tradition. Example, the meeting of the Dalai Lama and Jewish leaders could have only happened in modernity. We are called to confront the control element gone crazy. When pharoh runs amok with his own power - that's when new forms of community need to emerge. We have a challenge on how to make the ozone layer, or percentage of CO2 part of our community so we care about it.

Pastor Dan: Adding a word of caution about the use of the word prophetic. Millenial apocalyptic Christians see themselves as prophetic. It might be a term that can be reclaimed before it can be used properly.

Thurman: Prefers to use the word progressive because in his tradition you can't use the term prophetic because you are not being biblical. And also progressive is better because it is seen as a counter to inerrancy. Using progressive in some subsets of Christians could work, where as prophetic that could be a problem term. Also word 'liberal' can be problematic.\

Other discussion ensued about the terms prophetic and progressive, references to prophetic rituals, Martin Luther King as a prophet, and prophetic and progressive faith as challenging power. Also a challenge is that to account for the fear that our society is not what we'd like it to be. Bruce worries that moderates and progressives shrink back to chaplain state - deal with our own little worlds. But we have a desire to live within just institutions - but will we despair? Pastor Dan: You have to help people name real fear, and help them acknowledge that they are afraid. Rabbi Arthur said that that is a micro of the macro issue of the problems with modernity. Dreams and memories as a metaphor of what we are about. Live as if the dreams are as real as the memories. If people choose the enactment of the vision, people will react well, and that is the prophetic way of enacting the vision. Strengthening religious communities as an important part of this process as well. Discussion of what genies should get put back in the bottle - some should be left out, but which ones should be actually put back, like, for instance, issues of greed. How do you discern between good and bad modernity. Rabbi Arthur: Go forward to create forms of community where death-dealing becomes irrelevant. Genies never get totally back,  but forms of community that can contain them. Torah looks forward to it's own trasformation. "I will be who I will be" is the name that God gave Moses, not "I am who I am." Pastor Dan: Question flabbergasted him. Genies don't go back in the bottles. Once they are out you learn to surf the wave, or drown. You have to make choices, gambles. Telling people what to do doesn't work. What you do is let people make their own decisions and hope for the best. We can help people sort through issues and let them make their own decisions.

Other live blogger of this panel: Velveteen Rabbi.

Faith in Politics Panel


On 15 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Participants: Thurman Hart, Xpatriate Texan, Bruce Wilson, Talk2Action, Mik Moore, Jspot

Thurman discussed the history of the term "separation of church and state," which comes from a letter from Jefferson. And then continued to talk about issues of how this moves over American history. He talked about how Kennedy changed the landscape - as a Catholic, and as someone who brought a lot of scientific expertise into his administration. The left embraced this. As the left lost it's moral base, in distancing itself from religion, the right found it. We used to have a strong liberal wing built on faith, and a weak right wing based on secularism. And now we have the reverse. Recent examples of issues of faith and politics: Kerry avoiding the question about how he could be Catholic and pro-choice. Barak Obama is the second example.

Mik Moore spoke next: He comes from a Jewish perspective - which has been quite liberal, and secular. So conversations about faith and life have strong secular perspectives. He first read the speech and thought it was great. In a second reading, he find seeds of problems between progressive people of faith and secular progressives. He sees a problem in this conversation - for example, progressive people of faith feel like a minority among progressives, and this is an opportunity for an elected official to stand up and say that it was time for the secular left to stop silencing people of faith. The secular folks feel like they are a minority in the progressive movement, and in this country. For example, polls say that an athiest can't get elected. Two groups that at their core are allies, but we both have this complex where we both feel the other is dominant. We need to make sure that the frustrations we feel don't end up in a "fight with our friends", instead of where our energy should be focused. How do we translate our points of view into universal values, instead of just couching it in religious terms? He sees this as an important question.

Bruce Wilson: Looking at language of demonization. He had been looking at the Indian River Incident. This brings up how the religious left might enter politics. First - was what happened at Indian River wrong? We could do a collective statement about this issue. He then talked about a number of examples on the right, and the scope of their movements.

Discussion followed about a variety of issues. Here are a few highlights: Some conversation specifically about the strategies of the Democratic party, and the issue of Obama using a red herring in  talking about the issue of God in the Pledge of Allegiance - it is incumbent on us to be extremely clear about what it is we want to do. Tim suggested that his use of that in his speech was related to a 2004 incident that the moderates of the party had to deal with. One particpant brought up Elizabeth Castelli  who has written about the language of persecution in the religious right. Rabbi Arthur Waskow from the Shalom Center talked about the last time the religious left and secular left came together at the time of Martin Luther King Jr. And we can do that again. And he also talked about how the left has talked about the problem of modern culture, and the sense of victimization by the modern culture.  Bruce Prescott talked about the Baptists that focus on separation of church and state, and we can't surrender that. More discussion ensued about relative power of the religious right, and what's going on. The religious right isn't really in charge, but they do have political power. Stephen Rockwell suggested that it would have been better for Obama to talk about a plan for poverty, instead of the speech he gave. He also talked about issues of the lack of diversity on the progressive religious left. Chris Walton of Philocrites talked about the issue of the religious left being sort of the auxilliary of the secular left. There is a need for groups in the religious left to strategize around getting their own issues out there. He talked about the incredible creativity of the liberal theology in the academy, but hasn't made it out of the academy. There are a few people such as Marcus Borg, John Shelby Spong and others are the only people that have brought this creativity to the public. Liberal religious communities can provide the social base for progressive action, but they are in trouble.

Progressive Faith Blog Con, Saturday morning


On 15 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I'm not taking very careful notes, for the most part (except I was tasked with taking notes for the first panel, which have made their way on the blog con blog.) However, others have, and they are on blogs you should be reading anyway, so I figure I'll link to them.

First, we had a Buddhist meditation, in the Korean Zen tradition, led by Lorianne, of Hoarded Ordinaries. panel, called "Roots and Branches". Rachel, Hussein, and Bruce blogged about it. We next had Faith afflilation breakouts. I joined in on the Christian one.

We next had breakouts on blogging ritual, blogging text, and blogging meditation. Then came a yummy lunch, and Chris Walton of Philocrites, Stephen Rockwell of Cross Left, and I did "Talking Tech." A detailed list of blogging and other tools will be up on the con blog soon.

Overall, it's been great to meet people and talk, great to hear different perspectives on blogging and politics, and it feels like some good things will come of this conference.

Blog Con, Day 1


On 14 Jul, 2006 By mpm

It's been a good start to the con, I think. There were fewer folks than will be around tomorrow, so it was easy to meet everyone. Rachel of Velveteen Rabbi, Andrew of Semitism.net and Harriet led a Shabbat service, which was great. Then I sat around a dinner table with Mik and Jill from Jspot, Lorianne from Hoarded Ordinaries, Thalia from Time's Fool, Harriet (who writes an anonymous blog) and Andrew, and we had a wide ranging discussion about why we blog, how we blog, what's important to us. It was really interesting the range of motivations, strategies, and points of view.

And we found out from Lorianne that for some reason, people do a lot of searching for "Katie Couric panties". There are a number of strange search strings that will bring up my blog, but I think that's a bit out of my usual range. Although I do get "gay bear blog" a lot!

No, no, no!


On 14 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Well, it has become increasingly clear that ethanol from grain is not a viable alternative to petroleum based gasoline. Lester Brown has a new analysis on it that is chilling. He says: "The grain required to fill a 25-gallon SUV gas tank with ethanol will feed one person for a year."

We can't go there.

Hat tip to TreeHugger.\

Blog Con


On 14 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I'm sitting in the lobby of the conference hotel, waiting for the action to start. Well, I'm not waiting for the action to start, really, I'm waiting for my organizational compatriot for the Sunday Christian service to meet for lunch and a planning session because one of the three of us got stuck on the other side of the pond, and can't come. So we have to make due. Which will be fine after I finish freaking out.

I'm excited. You can read Xpatriated Texan's great post about why this con got started. Also, people will be blogging the event using the tag 'progfaithblogcon' so you can follow Technorati's list of posts.

And, since this is, after all, a blog con, I'll be doing as much live blogging from the con as I can, to give you a flavor of the events. I imagine there will be others doing the same.

Care about the global climate disruption? Jump!


On 13 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Get prepared for World Jump Day. The day in less than a week, when 600,000,000 people in the Western Hemisphere are supposed to jump at the same second, and move the earth out of it's present orbit, into another one, one that is slightly larger (therefore, further from the sun, cooling the earth.)

I haven't figured out whether these folks are serious. And I also can't help thinking about that 80s science fiction series, Space 1999, where a nuclear explosion on the moon sends the moon out of earth's orbit, roaming the galaxy.

Got this, of course, from Treehugger.

Mumbai Bombings


On 12 Jul, 2006 By mpm

What I've learned over the years is that events that happen in places I've been to have much more of an effect on me then events that happen at places I've never been. The Tianenmen Square protests in 1989 had so much more of an impact because I'd been there the year before. Katrina in New Orleans and the surrounding area was acute because I'd been there a few years before. Now, there is Mumbai.

My mother and I visited India about 10 years ago. We flew into Mumbai first. I remember it well. So the recent bombings in Mumbai have had their effect on me. I've been thinking about blogging this since I first heard about it, but I wasn't sure what I'd say. Then, all day today, Typepad was down, so when I had something to say, I couldn't post it.

There are some good photos on flickr (some of which are a little disturbing). Juan Cole has an interesting take on it. Also, there has been a deafening silence on the left about the blast. Salon has an interesting piece by a journalist who covers Kashmir.

What disturbs me about this is that, if Juan Cole is right, and "Al-Queda and its like thrive on cowboy diplomacy and reprisals", that this will lead to more violence, as we have seen in other parts of the world. I heard on a show called "On Point" that was covering what is going on in Somalia, that, in fact, it seems that Al-Queda is doing better with the kinds of things that the US and others are doing, not worse. Terrorism around the world is definitely not getting any better. So what India has been doing, what we've been doing, isn't working. It's time for a different approach. Maybe, uh, peace?

New Cool Aid


On 11 Jul, 2006 By mpm

A friend of mine, who had been completely sold on Bloglines, said to me once about another friend "she hasn't drunk the Bloglines coolaid yet." Bloglines is a very good way to keep track of the blogs you are reading. It's easy to preview what's new on a blog and organize your feeds.

Well, children, there is new cool aid, in the form of netvibes. Netvibes is completely wonderful, and I think a better alternative to Bloglines. Mostly, it is because it has a really nice AJAX feel (like the way GMail works,) and it is much easier to visually organize your feeds on the page. There are also multiple tabs, so you can organize your feeds.\

I've got a place for flickr photos from my contacts, a to do list, and a bunch of tabs to other collections of feeds. I'm happy with it.

Picture_2_3{width="350" height="231"}

Oooh, do I get my "early adopter" badge back? This is in beta!\

Second Life


On 10 Jul, 2006 By mpm

Well, I've been actively avioding writing this post about Second Life, for reasons that will become clear by the time you're finished reading this. First, for those of you who don't know what Second Life (SL) is, it is basically a multi-user world, where you have an avatar, which is something that represents you. You download a client which interacts with the world, and everything is in very nice three dimensions. Avatars can be fairly realistic, when I spent my few hours in Second Life, I was able to create an avatar that looked pretty much like me. I then remodeled my avatar to look nothing like me. So you can do what you want.

In the past, I've been a real fan of multi-user interactive environments. I spent huge tons of time in the early 90s living in MUDs and MOOs, which were text-based environments where you could interact with people, build things, role play, and basically live out your fantasies. SL is a lot like them, except the technology is light years ahead of what we had then. It's surprisingly realistic, works relatively fast on broadband, and can provide people with a very rich experience, and of course, people from all over the country, or the world, can interact together in one place.

OK, so now here's where the middle-aged luddite curmudgeon enters. What's the point? I spent about five hours in SL with a new account, exploring, talking to people, trying to figure out a good reason to keep going. Being in SL keeps me plastered in my chair, in front of my screen, when I'd rather be reading a book, or out walking on the beach, or taking to a real live human being, or if I'm going to be plastered in my chair, writing something interesting.

I think that the internet has created amazing opportunities to bring people together from disparate places so that they can work together in ways that they wouldn't be able to otherwise. I'd bet that the text based methods that we already have (IRC, IM, email) actually would be more efficient, because you wouldn't have to spend that time flying around and futzing with your avatar. And, from what I can tell in SL, you actually can't say as much at the same time as you can in, say, IM, because SL is very busy making typing noises, and showing your avatar at an invisible keyboard (I have to say, that is one of the dumbest things about SL, even though it is incredibly well designed. The idea is that you are speaking to other people, not typing at them!)

As a fun way to spend some time, it's not what I would choose to do, because these days, I'm valuing my time out from behind my screen too much. But I can totally see the draw, and I would have been all over this 10 years ago. But to get some actual work done? Not so much. But that's just my buck-fifty. If you find that you are really able to do things that you weren't able to do with other technologies, let me know.

I imagine that, as time goes on, and technology gets better, and more and more people have faster and faster connections, that a lot of our interactions over the internet will become richer. That's already beginning to happen with technologies like Skype and iChatAV. There is no question that SL and SL-like environments might become much more mainstream. But, I think I'll go sit under a tall tree and talk to a friend, a real one.

I think someone just revoked my "early adopter" badge.

When Worlds Collide


On 04 Jul, 2006 By mpm

In less than two weeks, I'll be at the Progressive Faith Blog Con, which is being held in New Jersey. It's worth a look at the schedule. Some amazing bloggers will be there. I'm psyched. I'm going to be involved in two parts of the schedule. The "Talking Tech" panel, where I get to pull my old nonprofit technology hat out of the closet, and the Christian worship, on Sunday. It will be very interesting for me, having emerged from thinking a lot about technology to right now thinking a lot about religion (and, also religion and politics.) My time on this coast is slowly winding down. The blog con is also the last thing I'm doing on the east coast before what I know will be a wonderful trip back to the Bay Area.

Disturbing times and time for new paradigm


On 01 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I've been reading a lot of the blog coverage of the Barak Obama speech, and it's fallout. On the right, is Al Mohler and others, blasting Obama for "secularism with a smile." On the left are people blasting Obama for falling into the right's arguments. Some of us are in the middle. And these are simply manifestations of the deep divisions we have in this country about the role of religion in public life.

There are three realities that we face. Three realities that frame, for good, or ill, the ways in which we talk about religion and politics, and the extent to which religion is involved in the public sphere. Three realities that affect the ways in which we frame and prioritize the problems that we face as a country, and as a society. Things are not going well. They are going to get worse before they get better. We had better figure this out.

First, we have been given, by the wisdom of our founders (who did some unwise things, too,) the separation of church and state. Article III of the constitution, and many Supreme Court cases have established this.\

Second, we have the reality that most people in this country are, in fact, religious, or at least spiritually leaning. According to recent polls, 91% of people in this country believe in God or a "Universal Spirit". 59% see religion as extremely important, or very important in their daily lives, with only 13% saying that it wasn't at all important. 77% of people think that the Bible is either the actual (28%) or inspired (49%) word of God. Not only that, but a majority (59%) of people think, believe it or not, that Christianity is under attack in this country today. And only 17% of people think that religion has too much influence in our country. An astounding 93% think that the motto "in God we trust" should stay on the US currency. Of course, these are  polls, and polls are innacurate. But I think that the basic message is clear. Most people in this country are, in fact religious, take religion very seriously in their everyday lives, don't think that there is too much of it in the public sphere, and therefore, will pay attention when it comes to politics. And, for good, or ill, these people are overwhelmingly Christian.

You can, if you want, call the overwhelming majority of people in this country crazy, as Jan Frel did on Alternet. But that is not going to help anything, except it might make a very small minority of people feel better.

I think that it is fair to say that Republicans and the religious right are wrong to say that Democrats are hostile to religion. I think it is also fair to say that Democrats have spent a lot of time sidestepping it, for reasons that are partially historical (the historical involvement of secular progressives in the party,) partially reasonable (a deep respect for separation of church and state,) and partially by being written out by the rhetoric of the right.

The third reality is that we live in a changing society, and what it means to provide "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" to everyone in this country is different than it was 230 years ago. Different not only because we acknowledge the basic rights of people who did not have those rights acknowledged then. Different also because our society is structured differently.

The religious right likes to focus on the second reality, and basically dismiss the other two. Progressives tend to focus on the first and third realities, and ignore the second. All three have to be taken into account.

I don't really have any good answers, but I have some good questions:

  • Would it help Democrats to express their values more clearly, specifically, express, along with traditional arguments about why we, as progressives, think that it is important that our society take care everyone, that they also bring in arguments relating to "social gospel (that is, that Jesus was very interested in the welfare of those who were poor, sick and outcast)?"
  • Would it help to tone down our rhetoric, to speak reasonably and respectfully, even when the right doesn't return the favor?
  • Would it be terrible for some Democrats who feel so moved to counter religious arguments against the stands they take (like the Alan Keyes example in Obama's speech) with their own religious perspectives?
  • How do we manage to uphold the rights of those who worship in all religions (or none at all) while allowing everyone's voice to be heard?
  • How do we manage to reconcile mutually exclusive ideas of the ways that this country should regard religion?
  • Would it help to actually have people of different perspectives sit down in the same (real or virtual room) and talk openly, plainly and honestly about their perspectives, instead of remaining in our self-enclosed enclaves, which continually reify our own points of view?

It is my point of view, that the old paradigms (including the kinds of internecine warfare within the left that are, and will continue, to occur around this whole issue) aren't going to help us get any closer to wresting this country back from the people who run it right now. We need some new approaches.

I hit the big time!


On 01 Jul, 2006 By mpm

I generally think of myself as a, well, third tier blogger. Mostly read by my friends and acquaintances and folks who I have connections with in cyberspace. Well, today, I seem to have moved up a tier. I got quoted in Slate!! I do read Slate now and again, but maybe I should read it more often! Anyway, the post that quotes me has some other good links in the whole Obama discussion, which has continued to have repercussions in the blogosphere.

Barak Obama, faith, and the Democratic Party


On 30 Jun, 2006 By mpm

Update: Welcome readers from Slate. Have a cup of coffee, stay a while ... :-)

As I said, one of the things I am interested in is the ways in which religion and politics plays out in the US. There has been quite the blog storm about the speech Barak Obama gave a few days ago, at Pentecost 2006: Building a Covenant for a New America conference.

I read the full speech, which you can find on Street Prophets. It's really interesting, in a variety of ways. One of the most important things is context. He was giving this talk to a group of religious (I believe primarily Christian) progressives. The conference was co-sponsored by Sojourners, which is an explicitly Christian organization, and Call to Renewal is a group of churches and faith based organizations working on poverty issues. So he was speaking to people that are religious, and care deeply about religion, as well as progressive. I think it's important to take these words in context.

The progressive response to this speech is exemplified by Chris Bowers, who says:

Obama has not only helped close the triangle on the notion that Democrats are hostile to religion, he has closed the triangle on who Democrats should appeal to in order to win elections. This danger of this is that in a nation where the only voters who matter to both parties are conservative evangelicals, then the only legislation we will ever get will be of the sort that appeals to conservative evangelicals. This will be the case no matter which party is in charge of Congress. Thus, closing the triangle on electoral strategy in this manner completely obliterates progressivism itself.

In other words, what Obama has done is to say that Republicans were right all along, Democrats are hostile to people of faith. And, fully, that he is indicating that Democrats should only be focusing their efforts on Evangelical voters. Daily Kos says:

Today Sen. Barack Obama inexplicably attacked his Democratic colleagues in a contorted speech about religion, accusing them of failing to, "acknowledge the power of faith in the lives of the American people." Portraying his own Democratic party as atheists unwilling to court evangelicals and other churchgoers ...

But, there are other voices. One blogger says:

If you read the whole speech, the almost kneejerk response to Obama pretty much illustrates his point of the discomfort by some progressives in any discussion of religion in the public square.

So, let's look at the speech. Obama starts out with:

But today I'd like to talk about the connection between religion and politics and perhaps offer some thoughts about how we can sort through some of the often bitter arguments over this issue over the last several years.

I do so because, as you all know, we can affirm the importance of poverty in the Bible and discuss the religious call to environmental stewardship all we want, but it won't have an impact if we don't tackle head-on the mutual suspicion that sometimes exists between religious America and secular America.

Now, there are a number of ways to read this. You can read it is "secular=progressive" "religious=conservative". If you do that, then, sure, what he is saying might be then construed to mean that "Democrats are hostile to religion". But keep reading. His first example is about his own campaign against Alan Keyes. He talks about how Alan Keyes was, at the end of the campaign, basically saying that Obama was not a true Christian. And Obama was encouraged by his supporters not to entertain his arguments. But, Obama is a Christian, and so, as he said:

What they didn't understand, however, was that I had to take him seriously. For he claimed to speak for my religion - he claimed knowledge of certain truths.

...

What would my supporters have me say? That a literalist reading of the Bible was folly? That Mr. Keyes, a Roman Catholic, should ignore the teachings of the Pope?

Unwilling to go there, I answered with the typically liberal response in some debates - namely, that we live in a pluralistic society, that I can't impose my religious views on another, that I was running to be the U.S. Senator of Illinois and not the Minister of Illinois.

But Mr. Keyes implicit accusation that I was not a true Christian nagged at me, and I was also aware that my answer didn't adequately address the role my faith has in guiding my own values and beliefs.

And, of course, it makes perfect sense that he felt the need to use the "typically liberal response" but felt that inadequate. Had I been running, I'd feel the same. Then, this, I think is the key paragraph:

Democrats, for the most part, have taken the bait. At best, we may try to avoid the conversation about religious values altogether, fearful of offending anyone and claiming that - regardless of our personal beliefs - constitutional principles tie our hands. At worst, some liberals dismiss religion in the public square as inherently irrational or intolerant, insisting on a caricature of religious Americans that paints them as fanatical, or thinking that the very word "Christian" describes one's political opponents, not people of faith.

He then talks about how religious people in the US are, and a bit of his own faith journey. He then returns to the issue at hand:

... if we truly hope to speak to people where they're at - to communicate our hopes and values in a way that's relevant to their own - we cannot abandon the field of religious discourse.

Because when we ignore the debate about what it means to be a good Christian or Muslim or Jew; when we discuss religion only in the negative sense of where or how it should not be practiced, rather than in the positive sense of what it tells us about our obligations towards one another; when we shy away from religious venues and religious broadcasts because we assume that we will be unwelcome - others will fill the vacuum, those with the most insular views of faith, or those who cynically use religion to justify partisan ends.

In other words, if we don't reach out to evangelical Christians and other religious Americans and tell them what we stand for, Jerry Falwell's and Pat Robertson's will continue to hold sway.

This paragraph is, I think probably the paragraph that most upsets progressives. This might have been what the Kos post was speaking about, but it's hard to see how Obama's words could be construed that way. What you do with that statement is key. I think most progressives might take this to mean that Obama thinks that perhaps the Dems should backpedal on issues like abortion or gay rights. And this is symptomatic of the problem: the right has so successfully framed the terms of the debate, that talking about religious issues and values means these hot button issues. But I actually think that what Obama is doing is trying to get us out of that framing. He continues by talking about the kinds of ways we can do this.

He then goes into a great example of how problematic some kinds of rhetoric can be. He received a letter from someone who is finds abortion problematic, and he felt that the rhetoric about choice on Obama's website about this issue was not fair-minded. He then changed the text on his website. This could possibly be used to suggest that he is backpedalling on choice. But I'd say it means that he is being more thoughtful and less inflammatory in his rhetoric (things I talk about frequently.) He then ends the speech with:

It is a prayer I still say for America today - a hope that we can live with one another in a way that reconciles the beliefs of each with the good of all. It's a prayer worth praying, and a conversation worth having in this country in the months and years to come. Thank you.

In the end, I think that this is very positive. He is right, most people in this country have some sort of faith, and Republicans have exploited this to forward thier basically immoral agenda. He's not saying, and I'm not saying that we need to do the same. What he is saying, and I agree, is that politics and religion do mix, and we (that is, progressives) ignore that at our own peril. Does this mean that we have to be conscious of the separation of church and state? Youbetcha. But it's time to talk about what our values are, and all of the variety of places, whether it be Christianity, Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, or secular humanism, where we get those values.

Unnecessary


On 26 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I'm just as blue as the next person. In fact, I'm so blue, I might even be indigo. (If you remember high school physics, and ROY G BIV - Red, Orange, Yellow, Green, Blue, Indigo, Violet - for the colors of the rainbow) I support the ACLU, NARAL, all of those lefty organizations that many on the right find troublesome. However, I'm beginning to find problematic some of the tactics of left wing organizations and activists.

Not so long ago, I talked about "means and ends" that the means are the ends. I got an email in my box from NARAL today, with a video which I found very troubling. It basically depicts various right wing people as monsters like godzilla, or swamp thing, etc. Why is it that we can't just say that we disagree with them, and see things differently, than cast them as pre-historic swamp monsters? Do we appreciate being dehumanized by the likes of Ann Coulter? So why do we feel it is OK to dehumanize them in return? What does this actually, really do, besides either scare people enough enough that they'll cough up money?

I've never liked using fear as a tactic. I don't like the fact that the Bush administration uses fear as a tactic to make it more likely that people will bend over when they do things like tap phones and get phone records. I don't like using fear of a theocratic takeover of the US as a tactic either. The truth is always far more complicated and nuanced, but complicated and nuanced feels like it doesn't lead to either action, or to contributions. But the continued process of ignoring complicated and nuanced realities leads to more divisivenss, and more fragmentation - and these are the things that are, ultimately, the enemies of social change.

Why is this?


On 24 Jun, 2006 By mpm

In an interesting story in SFGate today, a study has apparently found that people in the US are more isolated from each other than ever before:

Americans are far more isolated today than they were two decades ago, and a sharply growing number of people say they have no one in whom they can confide, according to a comprehensive study of the decline of social ties in the United States.

...

The study, funded by the National Science Foundation, paints a sobering picture of an increasingly fragmented America, where intimate social ties - once seen as an integral part of daily life and associated with a host of psychological and civic benefits -- are shrinking or nonexistent. In bad times, far more people appear to suffer alone.

Communities are fragmenting, and we're not connecting with each other. This, inevitably will have long-lasting social repercussions. It would be interesting to see how this differs by generations. And, for me, the question arises, how can progressive communities of all faiths help with this?

Stephen Colbert, at it again


On 23 Jun, 2006 By mpm

Stephen Colbert, who used to be on The Daily Show, but now has his new show, "The Colbert Report" which I don't watch, since I don't have a TV. But occasionally, I get snippets of stuff. First, was his speech at the annual Correspondents dinner in Washington, which was an incredible success (for everyone, I assume, except the person who made the contract with him.) Now, he interviews a congressman, who is a Baptist, who, although he advocates the display of the Ten Commandments in public buildings, can't name them!\

Those Presbyterians are on a roll and the Episcopals stop rolling

On 21 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

They have made it possible for gay church leadership and clergy. It gives local presbyteries the option to ordain gay clergy, and allow for gay leadership. It was approved by 57% to 43%.

In the other denominational meeting, the Episcopal Church has voted to "exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion." In other words, no more gay bishops, at least for a while.\

Arrival

On 21 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 3 Comments

I am, finally, at the destination that I will be at for three weeks - the Pioneer Valley of Western Massachusetts. It feels a bit like a homecoming - it feels familiar and comfortable, in that way that a home does. It's not too hot, today, which is a nice thing. And, not a lot has changed. I'm sitting at what used to be a new cafe in Northampton, with good coffee (actually, I'm having Chai) and free wifi. I'll have to go back to my old haunt of Haymarket Cafe, too. This area is a lot like Berkeley in that regard - it can support any number of independent cafés. Yay. No more Starbucks in middle america (or suburban NY) for a while.\

It's also nice to know that not only do I get to see people, I get to slow down, and just be for a while - keep being on my extended vacation. That feels good. So, if you know me, and live here, expect a phone call, or an email, or call me. I want to see everyone.

Presbyterians go gender-inclusive

On 20 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I'm really continuing to enjoy this denominational annual meeting watch. Most recent - the Presbyterians decided to "receive" a gender-inclusive policy paper. That means:

The divine Trinity --- "Father, Son and Holy Spirit" --- could also be known as "Mother, Child and Womb" or "Rock, Redeemer, Friend" at some Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) services under an action Monday by the church's national assembly.

...

Besides "Mother, Child and Womb" and "Rock, Redeemer, Friend," proposed Trinity options drawn from biblical material include:\ \ • "Lover, Beloved, Love"\ \ • "Creator, Savior, Sanctifier"\ \ • "King of Glory, Prince of Peace, Spirit of Love."\ \ Early in Monday's business session, the Presbyterian assembly sang a revised version of a familiar doxology, "Praise God from whom all blessings flow" that avoided male nouns and pronouns for God.

There were, of course dissenters, and this does not bind any congregations to follow it. Seems like a step in the right direction. Also, apparently today they will be voting on whether to allow some presbyteries leeway in ordaining gay clergy. We'll see what happens.\

Tis the season ...

On 18 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

For denominational conventions. For some reason, it finally dawned on me that it seems that most major denominations have their annual meetings/conventions/synods in the summertime. Since the UCC Synod only meets every other year, and this isn't one of them, I've been reading little bits and pieces about the other interesting meetings going on. UUA General Assembly is coming up soon, the Episcopals and Presbyterians are still meeting and the Southern Baptists just finished meeting. There are some really interesting tidbits coming out of the meetings:

  • The Episcopals elected a woman as the top bishop. Woohoo! Some think this puts them in even more trouble with the Anglican Communion, because some member countries don't think women should even be priests. (There is a conference blog)
  • The Episcopals and Presbyterians are dealing with the issue of gay clergy, and gay unions (of course, both the UUA and the Southern Baptists have long since dealt with the issue in their own ways.)
  • One of the most fascinating quotes I found in reading about the Southern Baptists was this one: "What angered me was that a reasonable discussion about the nature and extent of Christian liberty in the Gospel seems impossible among brethren who affirm the inerrancy of biblical authority. We do not seem to understand what Christian liberty is all about, and we certainly do not seem willing to recognize or appropriate the scriptural latitude for the sake of fellowship and peace." Of course! How can you possibly have a reasonable discussion when you read the Bible in the skewed fashion that is necessary to insist upon inerrancy? When you insist upon inerrancy, it's basically an argument about what text proves one point, versus what text proves the other. How does that help? This was from the discussion on the resolution against alcohol, that the SBC approved. (What was that stuff about Jesus turning water into - uh, what was it? Oh, right, wine.)
  • The SBC also passed a very anti-environmental resolution, that was partially based on the myth of unclear science about global climate change.
  • Oh, and Condi Rice spoke to the SBC folks. I wonder what that was about?\

Progressive Faith Blog Conference and Tagvocacy

On 18 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

How wonderful for these folks to choose to hold this conference while I'm on the East Coast! I'll be heading to the Progressive Faith Blog Conference (I was a host of the Progressive Faith Blog Carnival a while ago.) There are a bunch of cool folks that are going to be there, and I'm excited to get to meet some of my favorite bloggers real live in person, and talk about the progressive faith blogosphere, and what kinds of things might come from it. And, of course, I'll be blogging it!

A bit ago, I sort of gave my old colleague and buddy Beth a little bit of a hard time on a post about "Tagging for social change." But Beth has been someone who has been ahead of the curve in the nptech world on tagging and folksonomies, and I have come to realize that in the same way that the nptech world needs people to help identify and corral the folksonomy a bit, I think that the same goes for the religious blogosphere. So, I'm now calling myself a tagvocate for the progressive faith blogosphere, and I'll put up a post at some point soon about tags that I've used, and run into, that we should be advocating for. And, Beth, I might even sign up for that tagvocate email list. :-)\

\ What we mght have in common with fundamentalists {#what-we-mght-have-in-common-with-fundamentalists .blogTitle}


On 18 Jun, 2006 By mpm

A caviat first. When I was a fundamentalist, I belonged to the "holiness tradition" (that link is to a really interesting article - I learned a lot. I was, in case you are interested, a Nazarene) which is a different sort of strand than most fundamentalists in this country. Some would actually argue they are not really fundamentalists, since the focus is on ethics, not doctrine, but I would beg to differ, since at least in my church, there was an emphasis on scriptural inerrancy. Many other fundamentalists are, for example, Southern Baptists or nondenominational, or other smaller denominations. The holiness traditions have a particular point of view about what being a Christian means. This might skew my own perceptions about these issues.

I am drawn to think about this because I want to understand better what underlies different people's points of view, and I want to explore the ways in which people who we consider our enemies (or, at least, on the other side of arguments we see as central to our identities) actually might have a fair bit in common with us - commonalities that we can use to begin to have conversations with people.\

So what is it that fundamentalists might have in common with some of us? Some of us on the left have come to a very critical place about the whole enterprise of modernity - the realization that at some point, we veered off in the wrong direction, and that direction is having catastrophic effects on both the environment, and on human relationships. Some of us have come to realize that somewhere, somehow, we seem to have lost our soul, and our ability to care about and for each other, and live together in harmony. Somehow we let material goods and modern life get between us and each other, and us and God (or Ultimate Reality, or Spirit). That somehow, we need to find our way back to a place where the central focus is on how to live peacefully and sustainably on our planet, and with each other. That we need to find a way for each of us to find deep meaning for our lives, and our relationships. We need to stop consenting to the idea of advertising that we are not complete people, or lovable, or likeable, or can live happy lives without thus-and-such thing that is being sold.\

It is this deep criticism and distrust of modern capitalist society that we share with many (not all) fundamentalists. (Some fundamentalists, most notably those who either are part of the prosperity gospel crowd, or do things like market books and videogames, fall outside of this category, I think.) Fundametalists do tend to think that the reasons we're going in the wrong direction are different than we do, generally (having to do with concepts like original sin and depravity, and suchlike) and they come to very different conclusions as we do, but, I think, for the most part, they share a similar lack of trust in the current status of things, and a feeling that we've gone awry somehow. I became a member of the holiness tradition way back when (30 years ago, now) for a variety of reasons, but one of which was that I felt that the world wasn't as it seemed it should be to me, and that tradition gave me a set of explanations I could understand. I've come to very different conclusions now, but I understand why I embraced those conclusions then.

I was reading a review of "Crunchy Conservatives" in The Christian Century magazine this week (Christian Century is the left-leaning counterpart to the right-leaning Christianity Today. But leaning is definitely the right term - reading it is a bit of a growth edge for me, but several of my favorite people love it, so I'm learning to like it, at least.) And one of the fascinating quotes in the review about the book was when he was relaying a story in the book about an interaction the author had with some liberals: "But he notes how fear and hatred preempted his ability to think clearly." Fear and hatred of people that we disagree with keeps us from thinking clearly about what their motivations might be, and how what's underneath those motivations might actually be similar to how we might be feeling ourselves.

And loving our enemies means having a willingness to understand them, and is one step toward making them not be enemies anymore.\

Borrowed Wifi in New York

On 17 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I have decided I love the idea of shared open wifi. I am right now at my parent's abode in New York (Long Island, actually), and, as I suspected, they didn't install their wireless. But, their neighbor (who knows which one) has wonderfully provided password-free wireless. Yay! It's a bit flakey (seems to be much better outside than inside,) but it seems to be working, for now.

So, I give a big anonymous blog thank you to the neighbors, and to anyone else who provides free wifi to people who they might not know.

It just so happened that I was listening to Madonna's new(ish) album "Confessions on a Dance Floor" and the song "I Love New York" happened to be playing just as I drove across the George Washington Bridge. Really, no kidding. I might have done it unconsciously, but I was surprised. And, of course, the truth is that unlike Madonna, I don't like New York very much. It's too crowded, too noisy, too many aggressive drivers, not enough trees, no mountains, cows or corn. But for a moment, I was transported into Madonna's world, and could appreciate the city of my birth.\

Indiana

On 15 Jun, 2006 By mpm

After a horrible hour or so in Chicago traffic, I arrived in Indiana (I actually don't know what town I'm really in - just east of Gary.) Another night, another Comfort in. They are predictable, at least, and not too expensive. But I'll be in NY at my parent's house tomorrow, my first east coast destination.

It was a pretty uneventful day, and I didn't take any more photos (I figured people had seen corn before.) I listened to the beginning of Anne Lamott's "Plan B: Further Thoughts on Faith" Not at all depressing, and quite good, so far.

Probably won't blog for a couple of days, since I won't have consistent easy internet access (unless, by some miracle, my parents have installed their wifi.)  But I have lots of thoughts going in my head that I will want to get out of my head, and put on the bits and bytes of the blog, at some point, including something about what it is really like to be a premillenial dispensationalist (read: "Left Behind" eschatology. I was one, once) and what I think they actually have in common with the left (it might surprise you.)\

Gotta Love Iowa

On 15 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I think it may well be the only state with wifi hotspots at every rest stop. Whodathunkit? Iowa ahead of everyone else? I'm on a brief stop for a rest and lunch, crusing through Iowa on my way to ... ? Don't yet know how far I'll get today - we'll see how long I hold out. There isn't a whole lot of traffic today, going through Omaha was a breeze. We'll see what Chicago is like (if I get that far today.) I know that there will be a lot more traffic the further east I get.\

It's really nice to start seeing the verdant green of the east, slowly becoming more common. The ground is green, there are more trees, it feels more familiar. It's not too hot here today, thankfully. And it's great to see corn! I never thought I'd enjoy the sight of corn growing.

Update: I have been taken to task by a loyal reader, who suggests that my use of "whodathunkit" about Iowa in a blog that is supposed to be positive, was, in fact, a negative misportrayal of Iowans, and may lead to unfortunate circumstances. I heartily apologize, after all Iowa is ahead of the country not only in wifi at rest stops, but in many things, like the presidential nomination process, and ski resorts in flat states.\

Nebraska: Blast Furnace

On 14 Jun, 2006 By mpm

At one point, I got out of my car, and I could swear I was in a furnace, it was very windy, and very, very hot. I thought "gee, it must be that I've gotten soft from all that wonderful Bay Area weather." Then I heard that it was 104 degrees where I had been. No wonder! It was a blast furnace! Seems a bit hot for June (actually, it is pretty hot for June, although not a record for Nebraska, from what I can tell.)\

Anyway, I'm in North Platte, Nebraska, after having driven through the rest of Utah, Wyoming, and a chunk of Nebraska. I've uploaded a bunch of pictures from my trip so far, so check out my flickr page. A friend of mine wanted some Nebraska views. Here's one:

Dsc00400{width="250" height="187"}

One of the things I did today was listen to "Collapse" by Jared Diamond. An interesting combination of hopeful and depressing. It's worth a read/listen.\

So, I'm about 1/2 way there (not quite, I have a bit longer to go than I have already gone.) I'm enjoying the trip, enjoying seeing the sights, and my air conditioner works. I should be somewhere in Indiana tomorrow night. I'll keep you posted.\

Stinky Beauty

On 13 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I'm in Salt Lake City, Utah. Home of many Mormons, and a friend from PSR, who can now prove that there is life after PSR. I'm comfortably ensconced in her house, and online (once I fixed her wifi.)

As I was driving into Salt Lake City, it was raining, and Great Salt Lake was on my left, and I could definitely smell it. Then, all of a sudden, there was an amazingly beautiful rainbow that emerged out of the clouds, against the hills right before the city. Beautiful, and a funny juxtaposition with the stink of the lake!

Also, before that, when we were going through the salt flats, I saw the oddest thing on the other side of the road - it looked like a tree with tennis balls. I didn't get a chance to take a picture, but flickr comes to the rescue.

74893245_8dd771df4e_1{width="250" height="166"}\

I'll be leaving here tomorrow, continuing east. I'll probably make it as far as Nebraska before stopping again.\

Radical Torah

On 11 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I discovered the blog, Radical Torah a whille ago, because one of my favorite bloggers, Rachel Barenblat (of Velveteen Rabbi), is a contributor. Radical Torah is a blog that, for one thing, takes the week's Torah portion (one part of the Torah is read each week, for a whole year in Jewish communities) and gives a social justice perspective on it. In their words:\

Radical Torah is a weblog which features multiple takes on parshat hashavua (the weekly Torah portion), as well as commentaries on holidays, rituals and various concepts in Judaism, as seen through the lens of progressive religious and political viewpoints.

I have really come to appreciate it, and this week, they have an amazing piece by Brent Chaim Podek, called "Why Do We Pray?" This is the last paragraph:

One cannot see the face of God and continue with business as usual anymore than one can hear a lion roar and not be afraid. When we perceive God's face in nature, perhaps the response is to fall on our faces. When we perceive God in the pages of a book, then perhaps the response should be with words. But when the face of God appears in the faces of other people, then our response should take place in the syntax of ethics.

It's really worth a read.\

Writing (part 2)

On 11 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Just as I was thinking about my blog (I promise, this blognavel-gazing is coming to an end with this post,) I was clued by Beth onto an interesting post on a blog I never read, called MarketingProfs (yes, it's obvious I never read it,) about posting frequency. I had always kept in my mind the idea that I would try and post something everyday. As you well know, I rarely manage that target. I manage to probably post 5-7 posts per week, but they are often bunched (like the 3 posts on Friday, bypassing Monday, Tuesday and Thursday that week.)

So, anyway, I'm not worried about that much anymore. What I'm most thinking about is the content - what it is I'm offering to people who read this blog. I have decided, to keep separate my ministry blog and main blog, even though I was tempted to merge them for a bit. In this main blog, I'll be pretty much holding steady with what I've been doing, with a bit more emphasis on the positive and hopeful, and less on the negative and depressing. I will be focusing primarily on areas that are of real interest to me right now:

  • How we build bridges between people of different opinions, cultures, perspectives, and religious traditions, to figure out ways that we can see each other's humanity, and find common ground.\
  • The relationships between science and religion
  • The ways in which religion and spirituality and politics mix (and don't mix)

And, of course, you'll hear (and see) when I'm in the middle of nowhere in my car.

By the way, I'm going to be posting weekly reflections on my summer reading of the religious sort on my ministry blog. Today I just posted some reflections from reading Process Theology.\

Soon to be off...

On 10 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

I'm leaving to drive back to the East Coast on Tuesday. The floor of my room is filled with bags of various sorts, in various states of filled and unfilled. I've got my list of things to remember, and things to do. Luckily, the list isn't too long, and I've got two more days to get things done. I think I'll basically be prepared.\

I'm looking forward to four or five days "out of time." Days to be reacquainted with this big, vast country of ours. Days to listen to music. Days to think about and integrate all of the amazing things that have happened this year, and the ways that, in some regards, I am a different person than I was when I drove here almost a year ago. Days to listen to some audiobooks. I just got "Collapse," by Jared Diamond, and Anne Lamott's "Plan B", and I still haven't heard "On the Road" by Jack Keruak, the audiobook I got for the trip out here last year.

I hope to take lots of pictures along the way, so watch my flickr page as I travel. I don't have any idea how my internet connectivity will be, but lots of truck stops and the like seem to have wifi, so I might be in better shape than I think. We'll see. But I'm excited to be on the road, and to be back on the familiar East Coast for a while (I'll be there for about 4 weeks,) and seeing family and friends, and, basically, being "home." I've realized that it feels like New England is my home, and that this trip is about going home. Interesting insight.\

My first stop is Salt Lake City, Utah, where a PSR friend lives. Then, after that, I will simply stop pretty much when it seems I'm ready to. It's an adventure, and I'm very much looking forward to it.\

Means and Ends

On 09 Jun, 2006 By mpm

As I said in my post about writing, there have been several things in the past few weeks to make me think a lot about what this blog is for. One of the things that has happened quite recently is getting into a bit of a argument with the folks over at Talk2Action. The gist of the argument is covered in the discussions on my post on Street Prophets. There's no point in going over it here. But suffice it to say, I found myself in major disagreement with allies, and it has in a major way crystallized my thinking.

Disagreeing with allies is an interesting place to be in. Allies are not always people who you necessarily completely agree with, that would be pretty unlikely. But I tend to think of allies as people who are definitely working on the same team, for the same goals.\

One of things I have been learning over the past 10 years or so, particularly because of my spiritual and religious perspective, is that means and ends are, basically, the same thing. Like the old adage, "there is no way to peace, peace is the way," I have come to believe that the way that we go about trying to work for social change is as important as the social change we want to see.\

On the left, we have become really well versed in angry, inflammatory, paranoid and dehumanizing rhetoric and politics. We caricature people who disagree with us as stupid, nasty or evil, and we assume they have it in for us. We use the metaphors of conflict, violence and war. We create conflict within the left because we are so assured that we are the ones who are right. I have done this, without question, many, many times. And I'm beginning to realize that I can't do it anymore. It's not compassionate, and, if the means are the ends, those aren't the ends I want. (I am, as of this writing, retiring the "people who are out of their minds" award and blog category.)\

It doesn't matter to me that there are people who caricature and demonize people like me. It also doesn't matter that there may be indeed people who have it in for me, and it also doesn't matter that, in fact, there might be things to be paranoid about. But I'm not going to assume ill will, and I'm not going to return the favor of demonizing, and I refuse to get paranoid, and act out of paranoia. The means are the ends. I want to live in an open, honest, compassionate world, and I'm only going to get there by being open, honest and compassionate myself.

Writing (part 1)

On 09 Jun, 2006 By mpm

Varied happenings in my life in recent weeks have made me think about my blogs, and what I want them to be. The first thing on my mind is just the idea of writing itself. A friend of mine and I were having a conversation over awesome eggs and lox at  Saul's (my favorite authentic NY deli) one morning this week, and we got to talking about "core vocations" those things that are not necessarily our work at the moment, but are an essential part of who we are in our lives. I easily identified one core vocation as a teacher. My friend is also a teacher (she is actually now employed as an educator) and she identified another core vocation for her: writing (she did, at one point in her life, teach poetry, so that really counts.) She also said that she thought writing was one of my core vocations.\

I hesitated to say that. Writing has been an essential part of both my work and personal life for the past 25 years. Over that time, writing theses, papers, articles, talks, poetry, short stories, this blog, my journal, I have been constantly writing. I write something just about every day (that has been true for the last 10 years or so.) Of course, because I'm in school, I sometimes spend whole days writing. But why do I hesitate to call myself a writer? I have quite the problematic early history with writing, and that follows me today. I can't really get my head around the idea that I might be a writer.

In 8th grade, the worst year of my life, I think, I had an English teacher who, for a variety of reasons, didn't like me very much. She told me that I couldn't write. I don't remember what else she said, but as an impressionable kid who didn't have much of a good opinion of herself anyway, the idea that I couldn't write got imbedded in my psyche. Now, the truth was, of course, she was right. I was an abysmal writer at that time (of course, most 13 year olds are,) and it took until I was a junior in college to get beyond that, and become a halfway decent writer. But that idea that I couldn't write stuck with me for a long, long time, and I've finally shaken it off. Mostly. Of course, walking into a situation where I have to write papers in a whole different genre than I ever have before makes it easy to be humble about being a writer.\

There are implications, of course, of admitting to being a writer. The most important of which is that I have to begin to pay attention to craft, which is something I haven't spent nearly enough time on, honestly. If I don't think of myself as a writer, then the craft of what I write is something I can choose not to worry about so much. That seems a bit of a cop out.\

So, here I go. I'll admit that one of my core vocations is as a writer. I know that I'll be manifesting that vocation in a variety of ways in whatever ministry I am in after I leave school. But I have to start somewhere. So watch this space. Oh, and part 2 is coming, where I talk about what I want to write about.\

Thank you Michael Berg!

On 09 Jun, 2006 By mpm

Michael Berg, the father of Nick Berg, was interviewed on CNN this morning. Nick Berg was a businessman who was killed by Iraqi insurgents, and the CIA claimed that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was the person who beheded Nick Berg. Crooks and Liars has a great video you have to watch. What Michael Berg says, basically, is that he's sorry that al-Zarqawi was killed, and he doesn't think that revenge is the answer to anything. He keeps going on, even though the interviewer tries to steer him in the direction of saying that he's happy that al-Zarqawi is dead. He stands his ground. Really, have a listen.

CBS has a story on it too.

The Left Behind Video Game Brouhaha

On 07 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 3 Comments

I've blogged about it before. Left Behind, the incredibly well selling series of books about the end times, the rapture, etc. has spawned a video game, called Left Behind: Eternal Forces. Of course, because of it's basically premillenial dispensationalist theology (that's the term for people with the eschatology that there will be a rapture of all believers, followed by a tribulation, which includes the reign of the antichrist,) it is problematic. It is certainly not the eschatology I subscribe to (I actually don't have one.) But it is the eschatology of many people in this country.\

But this is the thing, the video game is, from what I can tell, not as bad as it's been portrayed.  It has been portrayed, in a number of places, including Talk2Action and SFGate suggesting that the point of the game is for players to convert or kill those that they come into contact with. Talk2Action says:

You are on a mission - both a religious mission and a military mission -- to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state - especially moderate, mainstream Christians. Your mission is "to conduct physical and spiritual warfare"; all who resist must be taken out with extreme prejudice.

SFGate says:

Behold, blessed children, the new and upcoming "Left Behind: Eternal Forces" video game, based on the freakishly best-selling series of apocalyptic trash-lit books. It's an ultraviolent, hilariously inept, wondrously accurate portrayal of what every true right-wing Christian fundamentalist really fantasizes about after they've had one too many pink wine spritzers and have logged a few hours in the gay chat rooms and have sufficiently indoctrinated their happily numb kids with tales of vile homos and scary "progressive" liberals who want to buy them candy and tattoo their sacrums and feed them organic hot dogs.

Interestingly enough, conservative Christian bloggers aren't even in agreement about the game. One blogger says:

It is true that the player scores points by converting non-Christians, but that is hardly surprising since the game comes from evangelicals. No one kills people for not converting, although Christians are depicted as fighting anti-Christ security forces who are trying to kill them. Even when killing in self-defense, the Christian loses points.

Another says:

If it were a realistic game, it would teach the kiddies to look a bit closer to home for evidence of antichrist.\ \ "Thinking about what will happen when you die should be as exciting as 'Raiders of the Lost Ark,'?" Mr. Lyndon said.\ \ Despite the violence of the game, promoters say it embodies Christian values. There is prayer for soldiers before battle, and players lose "spirit points" for unnecessary killings. The promoters suggest Jesus' commandment that his followers should "turn the other cheek" has been misunderstood

So what's the truth, really, about this game? There is a fascinating discussion going on about the Wikipedia entry on this game. Leave it to secular gamers to tell you exactly what this game is about. GamespyPC says:

It's this wrestling back and forth for the souls of the people that makes the gameplay dynamic so interesting. Players aren't competing to kill the enemy army -- rather, they're trying to save them, and each person killed represents a failure rather than a success. 

That actually sounds a lot more like the evangelicals I'm familiar with. Gamespot seems to agree:

As you'd expect, you'll be encouraged to do good while playing the game, but you may also do evil, as well. Like many real-time strategy games, Eternal Forces features a variety of resources that you need to accumulate to build units. One of these resources is your spiritual rating, which measures how good or evil you are. If your troops kill civilians and innocents, your spiritual rating drops, and if it drops too much, you may see your units defect (each unit has his or her own spiritual rating), and if drops too far, demons will show up. While demons are incredibly powerful units, they're uncontrollable and capable of turning on you as well as the enemy. On the other hand, if you do good (by building churches), your spirit rating will rise, and angels may appear to help you out. This idea of consequences, as well as rewards and punishments, reinforce the game's sense of morality.

All of the game sites basically agree with this. Yes, there is killing in this video game. So what? They are trying to sell the game to 13 year old boys that are used to Grand Theft Auto, Doom and Quake. If there wasn't any killing, I doubt they'd sell any games. Is that a problem? Yes, but it is a very different problem than has been portrayed for this game. (One might even argue that losing points by killing, which is the direct opposite of any other game, is an interesting counter message to kids who play the game.) Call this game an interesting study in how people with the "Left Behind" eschatology are working to make money, and manage to mangle Christian doctrine while they are at it, which is, of course, what they are already quite good at. That's really about all you can say.

I think, in the end, this will backfire on those who are working to try and decrease the influence of the Christian right in the US government. This kind of inflammatory (and ultimately false) reporting on this game is going to help to fuel the notion that some people, like the folks at Talk2Action are anti-Christian, which they are most certainly not. And it also helps to continue and deepen the rhetoric of conflict, and I'm really not clear that the rhetoric of conflict is the right approach to take in regards to the Christian right at this time.

Is there a threat from the Christian right? Absolutely. But remember Roy Moore, the 10 commandments guy from Alabama? He lost. In the end, most people in this country are not the Christian right. One blogger said this about the coverage of the video game by the left: "How they must despise Christians, especially conservative ones, to believe that some well-known Christian leaders would actually endorse the massacring of non-Christians because they did not convert. " This is the kind of attitude that is going to turn "purple" Christians away from progressive messages. And, in the end, it's the purple Christians that are going to make the difference.

Update: There is an interesting discussion happening on Street Prophets, where I cross-posted this blog entry.

The buzz that is my church {#the-buzz-that-is-my-church .blogTitle}


On 03 Jun, 2006 By mpm

I have blogged only a little about my current home church, New Spirit Community Church, in Berkeley. I talked about it some when I blogged about joining it in November. I figured that it was probably time to talk some more about it. It is going through some enormous changes right now - all three worship leaders (the senior pastor Karen Foster, associate pastor Nathan Meckley, and music director Darren Hochstedler) are leaving this month. Some of those changes were known for a while, some a bit sudden.

Karen Foster is not only the senior pastor, she's also the founding pastor, and the nature of New Spirit is, to a large extent, due to her leadership. The church is only 5 years old, and is a dynamic, growing church, with an incredible capacity, depth and richness in the congregation and on the board, which will be quite important as it deals with these transitions. New Spirit is unique. It is an offspring of MCC San Francisco, which is a pretty amazing church, with great leadership itself. New Spirit is the only church that is affiliated with the three denominations, MCC (fully), UCC (fully) and DOC (Christian Church, Disciples of Christ, in-care). Because of the dual affiliation of MCC and UCC, New Spirit is the epitome of the UCC idea of open and affirming.\

Apparently (actually, I know this is so) there is a buzz in the larger religious community, at least in Northern California, about New Spirit. It has managed to combine depth of spiritual practice and worship, with progressive, inclusive theological perspective and active social justice work. It provides a spiritual home and spiritual sustenance for people of very wide ranging theological and religious perspectives. It is, perhaps, what a theistically-oriented UU church that wasn't afraid of grappling with chewy theological issues, and embraced both exuberant and contemplative worship styles might be like. It has been said, and I must agree, that New Spirit is a model for the future, especially for the post-homosexuality-as-reason-for-conflict-and-schism future (that future is coming, by the way, it just is going to be further away than we'd like it to be.) I might also say that New Spirit is an example of an Emerging Church.

I hope that I can, as someone who is supported and mentored by my church (in my capacity in-care) that I can serve it in a way that helps it to continue and grow as the buzz-worthy entity it is. And I hope, also, that at some point in the future, I can manage to be a fraction of the pastor and leader that I have seen in both Karen and Nathan over the past 9 months of my time with New Spirit.\

Scientists? {#scientists .blogTitle}


On 02 Jun, 2006 By mpm

OK girls and boys, what is a scientist? A scientist is someone who makes hypotheses, makes observations and experiments, evaluates that hypothesis based on evidence, revises the hypothesis, invites peer review, and does the cycle all over again. A scientist is not someone who counts 77 geneologies in the Bible and tells Baptists that means the earth is about 6,000 years old. Or one that conducts "independent tests on rocks and coal" to come up with "a strikingly similar dating--6,000 years, plus or minus 2,000 years' margin of error."

I have been badly remiss in my awarding of the "people who are out of their minds" prize on this blog. These folks get it. Needless to say, these 'scientists' are from the outfit Institute for Creation Research.\

Religious communities and technology

On 02 Jun, 2006 By mpm

A post about tagging (the tool/concept that allows one to identify information based on keywords, and create "Folksonomy") on a friend's (and old nptech colleague) blog made me decide to blog about something that has been sort of in the corner of my consciousness for the past while. Now that I am into some summer leisure, and have time to think deep thoughts, this seems to have come to the forefront at this moment.

I have been involved in helping religious communities of varied sorts out on technology issues for about 5 years, ever since I helped design a website for the Insight Meditation Center of Pioneer Valley (then Dhamma Dena Meditation Center,) and the website for the Unitarian Society of Northampton and Florence (both of these organizations have wisely since moved on from my original site design.) For the last couple of years of work as a techie, it was actually something that I thought a lot about, and tried to focus a little bit of my energy on. Now that I'm in seminary, I have a more distanced perspective on the whole enterprise of technology and organizations, which I think in many ways is quite helpful. (See my comment on Beth's post about tagging.)

Most religious communities are quite similar to small, grassroots non-profit organizations in many ways, in terms of their technology needs. They need the basics: a membership database (I could write a whole blog entry about how bereft that space is of good, let alone open source, solutions for churches, especially non-traditional ones), a website, email and e-newsletters. And, in some ways, because so much of what these organizations do is face-to-face, they are less likely to get sucked into the idea that technology will help them do their mission better.

There are some things to say about that last sentence. The first is a qualifier. I am not a luddite. Really, I'm not. I do think that there are many situations in which technology can indeed help non-profits (and religious communities) do their mission better, as long as the organization is really clear on what their mission is, and the technology is fitted to that mission, and doesn't take too many resources (money, staff time) away from the core activities of that mission. If I didn't think that, I wouldn't have devoted almost 10 years of my life to that endeavor.

But sometimes, there is this tendency to think "if we only had that database" or, in the case of churches "if we only had a projector for church service, or only had a new website" it would solve problem x or problem y. In our everyday lives, we get sucked into the idea that technology solves our problems. And we forget that technology not only doesn't always solve problems, it also causes problems we didn't anticipate. Yes, that database is going to help you find members easier, and send them targeted emails based on _________ (their location, interestes, etc.) But it also will mean staff time to maintain, unexpected downtime (always, of course just before you are ready for a huge mailing or event.)

I had a meeting with someone recently about a website (in the religious/political realm), and what struck me was that, like many organizations, what was needed wasn't newer, better technology, but newer, better thinking about how to use the technology that was already available. I think it is very easy to let technology do the work, so we don't have to do too much of that newer, better thinking about our core missions.\

The mission of religious community is to create opportunities for people to encounter ultimate reality and incorporate that into their daily life, create community, and help each other, and the whole world. 90+% of that work will happen off the keyboard and off the screen, in person-to-person contact, which is as it should be. Keeping that all in perspective, in a world where everything tells us that technology will solve all of our problems, is the challenge.\

A Generous Orthodoxy

On 01 Jun, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I finished book one on my long list of summer reading.  It was A Generous Orthodoxy, by Brian McLaren. First thing that told me that I'd probably like the book: his favorite musician is Bruce Cockburn (he actually even looks a little like Bruce.) Anybody whose favorite musician is Bruce Cockburn is OK!\

Brian McLaren is considered one of the big lights in the "Emergent Church" movement. I've talked a bit about it before. These are postmodern folks working on the post-denominational (even post-Protestant) future of the Christian church. He, like many in the Emergent church movement, started out on the conservative side of the spectrum. So his perspectives are very colored by those origins. He comes to some very different conclusions than I would in some instances, and in others, we'd very much agree.

This book, in certain circles has generated a lot of flak for him. Particulary among fundamentalists. I can certainly understand that - it is a book that, instead of affirming the fundamentals as they see it, affirms the fundamentals that are quite a bit more biblical: love of God and neighbor. This is an important underlying principle in the book, one, as you all know, is something I can get behind.\  

This book is an interesting combination of personal perspective and didactic description of the different strains of Christianity, and, in particular, the parts of these different strains that he likes, and has problems with. After a couple of chapters of apologies and warnings (which, although I apreciate his humility and self-deprecation, is a bit much,) is a great chapter on "The Seven Jesuses I've Known" and describes, as he understands them, what parts of Jesus are emphasized in each of seven traditions (conservative protestant, Catholic, charismatic/pentacostal,liberal protestant, liberation theology, anabatist, and Eastern Orthodox.) For me, it was helpful to hear his perspective on the differences (for instance, conservative Protestants focus more on the death of Jesus, whereas liberal Protestants, Anabaptists and Liberation Theologists focus on his life and work.)  And his reason for doing this, which is a theme that he carries throughout the book, is that each tradition has its particualr gift to give, and a "generous orthodoxy" would embrace all of these.

He then goes into his perspective on God. He defines a "God A" as "a single, solitary, dominant Power, Mind or Will" and "God B" as "a unified, eternal, mysterious, relational, community/family/society/entity of saving Love." He is finding himself very much in the universe of God B.

He then asks the question "Would Jesus Be a Christian".  He answers this with the comment, "Often I don't think Jesus would be caught dead as a Christian, were he physically here today."  And another comment is that he doesn't think that most Christians would like Jesus if he arrived today. He says, "In fact, I think we'd call him a heretic and plot to kill him too." I tend to agree with him here.

He has a chapter on what it is that Jesus is supposed to be saving us from, anyway. He's pretty clear that a focus on hell has been problematic at best. He says "In the Bible, save means 'rescue' or 'heal.' It emphatically does not automatically mean 'save from hell' or 'give eternal life after death' ... Rather its meaning varies from passage to passage, but in general, in any context, 'save' means 'gets out of trouble.' The trouble could be sickness, war, political intrigue, oppression, poverty, imprisonment, or any kind of danger or evil."\

He then spends the rest of the book going through different strains of Christianity, and explaining what he likes about each - what he'd like to take from each, and where he sees each has failed. I think that this is a really interesting exploration of the strengths of different traditions within Christianity, and what has worked, what has miserably failed, and what might be worth rescuing.

There are two aspects of his discussions that were of particular interest to me. One that caused me some difficulty was his perspectives on mission.  He says that he is "missional" - and he describes it this way: "Those who want to become Christian (whether through our proclimation or demonstration,) we welcome. Those who don't, we love and serve, joining God in seeking thier good, their blessing, their shalom." He does have a good discussion of the issues relating to how Christians should relate to those of other faiths, one that is likely quite radical given his conservative background, but from my perspective, it doesn't quite go far enough. I question the whole enterprise of the evangelism part of missions (he actually tries to deconstruct the 'evangelism' and 'service' dichotomy of mission work, but I'm not sure it's so successful.) He understands the problem with the whole missionary enterprise in the past, and the wholesale export of European and American culture with missionary work in the past. I just think it needs more consideration than he's given it.

The second part of the discussion that I found interesting (of course) was his focus on spiritual practice and piety, and the ways in which some traditions (like Methodism, and charismatic and contemplative traditions) have had that as a focus, and that is something he would like to rescue, and become part of this "generous orthodoxy." He talks a bit about orthodoxy (right thinking) and orthopraxy (right practice), and I think his perspective is that orthopraxy is in need of rescuing, and orthodoxy has been used too much as a club with which to beat other people. He has a great discussion of baptism, and the significance of baptism in different traditions, and the ways in which that has changed over time. He also has a great discussion about Anabaptists, and the way they have rejected modernity is something that is a very good thing.\

Unfortunately, he completely sidesteps questions of patriarchy (except for a couple of mentions of the problem with the complete focus on the masculine aspects of the divine in Protestantism) and homophobia, although he does deal with culture and issues of ethnic and racial oppression. He explains, and I agree, that until Christians and Christianity repents from the atrocities of its past, and practices deep humility, there isn't really a way to move forward. He does seem to have some kind of hope that all Christians can begin to appreciate the gifts that all traditions hold, and begin somehow together to create this "generous orthodoxy."

On the whole, this was an enjoyable book to read, particularly before I knew enough theology and Christian history to argue with him on those counts. I think it's worth a read if you are a seminarian of any stripe, or concerned with the present state of Christianity, or even at all curious about it, or about the Emergent church movement.  I think that the whole enterprise that he is working on, that is, looking back at the most important parts of the message of Jesus, and looking at what has worked, and what hasn't worked, and deeply understanding our present context, and building from there, is, I think, a good enterprise, even though he and I would likely erect different buildings. And I think that, for him, that would be OK.\

Not too much of a surprise... {#not-too-much-of-a-surprise... .blogTitle}


On 30 May, 2006 By mpm

You know I'm a quiz junkie, you know I'm a science fiction fan, so here goes... (thanks Poppy)

Update: I just now realized that Deanna Troi, the empathetic counselor, and Geordi LaForge, the geeky engineer, were tied in this quiz. How appropriate!

Your results:\ You are [Deanna Troi]{size="6"}

+-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+ | +---------+---------+---------+ | You are a caring and loving | | | Deanna | ----- | 75% | | individual.\ | | | Troi | | | |   You understand people's | | +---------+---------+---------+ | emotions and\ | | | Geordi | ----- | 75% | | you are able to comfort and | | | LaForge | | | | counsel them.\ | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Uhura | ----- | 55% | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Chekov | ----- | 55% | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Jean-Lu | ----- | 55% | | | | | c | | | | | | | Picard | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Data | ----- | 47% | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Mr. | ----- | 45% | | | | | Sulu | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Beverly | ----- | 45% | | | | | Crusher | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Leonard | ----- | 45% | | | | | McCoy | | | | | | | (Bones) | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | An | ----- | 40% | | | | | Expenda | | | | | | | ble | | | | | | | Charact | | | | | | | er | | | | | | | (Redshi | | | | | | | rt) | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Will | ----- | 40% | | | | | Riker | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Mr. | ----- | 35% | | | | | Scott | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | James | ----- | 35% | | | | | T. Kirk | | | | | | | (Captai | | | | | | | n) | | | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | | | Worf | ----- | 30% | | | | +---------+---------+---------+ | | +-----------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Click here to take the "Which Star Trek character am I?" quiz...

Tilden Park

On 30 May, 2006 By mpm

Sometimes, I can be a nebbish. I was  complaining (it's very possible you heard it) about how much of a city Berkeley was, and how hard it was for me, and how I missed being near cows. Well, I'd heard a lot about this place, but hadn't really been there. Come to find out, that I was 10 minutes (by car) away from one of the most beautiful places around, called Tilden Park. I had a delightful afternoon walking with a couple of friends, and saw some cows, even. I've uploaded pics to my flickr account, but here's a taste. Yes, this is 10 minutes from PSR.

Dsc00373{width="250" height="187"}

Summer Reading List

On 30 May, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Well, it would hardly be summer without a reading list. I've got one. It's pretty long, and a bit schizophrenic (it's mostly religion and science fiction.) We'll see how many of the books on my list I'll get through. The first few books on my list I have on the sidebar on the right, and then there is a long list after that. I'm already halfway through Brian McLaren's book Generous Orthodoxy (a full review will be coming the way of this blog very soon - it's been a very, very interesting book to read,)  Sherri Tepper's Fresco, and Michael Eric Dyson's book about Bill Cosby. So, without further ado:

  • Brian McLaren, Generous Orthodoxy (religious/political non-fiction)\
  • Sherri Tepper,  Fresco (science fiction)
  • Thomas Keating, Foundations for Centering Prayer (religious non-fiction)
  • Michael Eric Dyson, Is Bill Cosby Right, or Has the Black Middle Class Lost its Mind? (political/social non-fiction)
  • Marcus Borg and John Dominic Crossan, The Last Week (religious non-fiction)
  • Khaled Hosseini, The Kite Runner (fiction)
  • John Dominic Crossan and N.T. Wright in Dialogue, The Resurrection of Jesus (religious non-fiction)
  • Larry Niven and Brenda Cooper, Building Harlequin's Moon (science fiction)
  • C.J. Cherryh, The Deep Beyond (science fiction)
  • Pablo Neruda, The Essential Neruda (poetry)
  • Phillip Zaleski, ed., The Best American Spiritual Writing (religious non-fiction)
  • Galway Kinnell, A New Selected Poems (poetry)
  • Marjorie Hewitt Suchocki, God, Christ, Church: A Practical Guide to Process Theology (religious non-fiction)
  • Karen Armstrong, The Crusades (historical non-fiction)

Yeah, I said it was a long list. I think I will get through half of them, which would be good. I'll probably read all the fiction and poetry, though. I have to say, it's a bit telling about me. I spend an entire school year, reading an incredible amount (and kvetching about it) and what do I do when vacation rolls around? READ MORE, and look forward to it. Sigh.\

Environmental tidbits

On 30 May, 2006 By mpm

Well, I don't know whether these fall into the category of tidbits - tidbits have a quality that suggests tasty, or nice, nourishing little bits, or something. These will for sure taste sour in the mouth.

First thing: Dust. I heard a story on NPR yesterday about how dust storms, which result from dust as far as the Sahara or Gobi deserts, get deposited on snow in places like Colorado, which then increases the rate at which the snow melts, creating a water shortage problem - the snow melts too fast, and the folks downstream who depend on the snow pack for irrigation, and general use, don't have the water at the right time. So - human activity (overfarming) leads to dust storms, which lead to less snow pack, which leads to less water, which leads to lower yeilds of food and water shortages elsewhere. And combine that with the effect of global climate disruption (I'm using this term, from now on, instead of global warming, or global climate change,) and were in a bit of trouble. As if you didn't know that already.\

Speaking of food, if you thought ethanol was a good fuel alternative given the decrease in petroleum supply, think again.  I guess manufacturing more efficient cars, or maybe even driving less, is just too much to ask, so we need to think about using food supplies as alternatives. It turns out, that if we start using corn for ethanol, that means less to eat. And since there are a lot of people in the world, and agriculture (see reasons above, among others) has probably reached it's peak production capacity worldwide, using corn for ethanol is just not a good idea. Ethanol also takes energy to produce, and is less efficient in cars as gasoline is. So don't fall for it.\

Mike Davis, who wrote the really good book, City of Quartz, about the city of LA (I taught the book once) has a new book out, called Planet of Slums (it's on my wish list.)  There is a great interview with him on the Peak Energy blog. He is describing that as many as a billion people live in slums in varied parts of the world, and talks about the kind of conditions there are, and the ramifications of this reality.\

Another example ...

On 30 May, 2006 By mpm

... of something that will get someone in trouble with the copyright police, but for no good reason. This is an inventive, and very funny mashup of Star Wars and Lord of the Rings, called "Star Lords." (Link for broadband only, sorry.)\

Democracy TV

On 28 May, 2006 By mpm

I had run into Democracy TV, a while back, but I re-discovered it in a much more mature state last week. It's basically a platform which takes advantage of "Web 2.0" and bittorrent. Particularly, what it does is allows you to subscribe to RSS feeds of videos, download them, and watch them, within an iTunes -like interface (read: easy to use.) All of the videos are free, and almost all are independently produced - free of commercials, etc.

It's really great - I'm now subscribed to Democracy Now video feed, Terra TV (nature,) TreeHugger TV (environmental/design,) MacTV (you know what that is,) and some other interesting stuff. Anyway, if you've got broadband, it's absolutely worth checking out.  And the software is cross-platform, and open source.\

Recovering from a full weekend

On 28 May, 2006 By mpm

I drove back from Santa Barbara on Friday, just to turn around and drive up to Redwood Valley, up north of Ukiah, about 2.5 hours north of Berkeley. I was there for a very special occasion. My friend, and Buddhist teacher Arinna Weisman, was being blessed because she is "going forth" to be ordained into the monastic life. We were at Abhayagiri Monastery. It was a wonderful ceremony, and I think that it was really special for Arinna to have so many of her friends and students there. There are photos of some things (I didn't get any actual pictures of the ceremony itself) on my flickr page.\ \ Then, this morning, I myself was blessed during the Sunday service as officially "in-care" with the New Spirit congregation. It felt really nice, and felt like I took another step along my ministry path.

So, it's been a full weekend, and it's nice that I've got a week coming up with virtually nothing to do! Yay!\

The Rut

On 25 May, 2006 By mpm

I've decided that the Democratic party is stuck in a rut, and can't get out. I don't care so much about them, really, except that unlike any other party I might align myself with (like the Green Party or the Democratic Socialists) they have at least a vague chance of winning (compared to a snowball's chance in hell of winning pretty much anything except very local races.) So I care about what they do, and what they say, and how they position themselves in terms of trying to take back the government from, frankly, the fascists that are in power.\

First off, they are stuck in the rut of self-preservation. They care more about their own hides, than about the good of the country. Case in point, the silly, silly rallying around Rep William Jefferson, whose office was raided because he was stupid enough to accept a huge cash bribe from an undercover agent.  I don't care if he is a congressperson, I don't care that he's a Democrat, I don't care if he is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus, I don't care what good he's done. Taking bribes is a crime, and from what I could tell about the evidence, they had probable cause. They had a warrant and they did what they were supposed to do. He is still innocent until proven guilty, but searching his congressional office is fair game. This is not to say I would put it past this current administration to make something up against a Democratic congressperson. From what I can tell, this isn't it.\

We found out a couple of weeks ago that the NSA has been collecting, illegally, millions of phone records from everyday Americans, without probable cause or a warrant. A month or so ago, we found out that the Bush administration has been illegally listening in on international phone calls. Did they get all up in arms about that? A little kerfluffle, but not anything like the bipartisan ruckus they've been making now. Sounds like a double standard to me. Yes, it's OK to illegally violate the privacy of millions of people, but search their offices when you have probable cause? How horrific! And, of course, that rut of self-preservation is what got Jefferson in trouble in the first place. And it's what keeps the Democrats in the pockets of all sorts of interests.

Then, there is the "search for the vote" instead of finding a set of values and articulating a message. Recently, Democrats have been courting the evangelical vote.  Now I don't think this is, on its face, a bad thing. There are plenty of progressive, or even centrist evangelicals, for whom the wedge issues of gay marriage and abortion are either not issues, or aren't nearly as important as the moral issues of war, poverty, affordable housing, health care and the environment. But instead of working to get their votes based on the basic ideals of the party, not simply pandering to their perceived perspectives by watering down the party's well established points of view on abortion and gay rights.

They lack the courage of their supposed convictions, a willingness to take risks, and to clearly articulate their message. Based on the experience of the last 8 years, it is unclear to me why Democrats think that they will get anywhere. There's that old adage: insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result. 

Go see this movie {#go-see-this-movie .blogTitle}


On 25 May, 2006 By mpm

Yesterday, the movie An Inconvenient Truth was released. Unless you live in LA or NY, it won't come to a theatre near you until June. I'm definitely going to see it, and I think everyone should, even though many people will think of this as preaching to the converted. You can see the trailer (don't click on this link unless you have broadband.)

NPR reviewed the film, both in terms of science and art. I have a quibble with the review, but basically it was fair. Rotten Tomatoes is a good place to see a compilation of reviews - most of them are positive.\

Al Gore has been an advocate of the environment for a very long time. Although a lot of people are wondering why he didn't have more influence while he was VP - I think that they are forgetting that, on the whole, the Clinton administration had a very good environmental record, and that Al Gore was not a Dick Cheney (because Bill Clinton was not a George W. Bush.)

Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing it, even though, as all of you know, I already know what it will say. 

An informal poll

On 22 May, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I'm sitting in the living room of my friend who lives in the Santa Barbara area, resting up, enjoying good company, and just beginning the process of integrating all that has happened to me this year (there's a lot!!)

I've been thinking a lot about writing, and doing more of it, of varied sorts. I like to write, and I'd like to get better at it, and find my voice, whatever it might be like. And thinking about writing includes thinking about not only the content and the genre, but also the medium - that is, including my blogs. So I'm taking an informal poll. Please, please take just a quick moment to write in the comments section your answer to the following questions. I wish I had some cool swag to give you, but you'll have to just settle for my heartfelt thanks.\

A) Why do you read my blog? (Choose as many as you want)\

  1. You are a friend/family member, and want to keep up with my goings on
  2. You get important/useful/interesting information from it.
  3. You like to hear my perspective on things
  4. You like the writing
  5. Something else ...\

B) You read my other blog

  1. yes
  2. no

C) You like my entries best that are ... (again, choose as many as you want)\

  1. Personal
  2. About religion/spirituality
  3. About politics
  4. About technology
  5. About the environment\
  6. About ...

D) If there is one thing you'd want to tell me about my blog it would be ...

E) You would stop reading my blog if ...\

Thanks!! I hope that my ruminations, and your feedback, will help me figure this writing thing out.

If you want, you can email me, too.

Making Choices

On 20 May, 2006 By mpm

I ran into a colleague of mine today at the conference (there are a lot of PSR and GTU folk about,) and she had heard, at the PSR Breakfast this morning, that I had a blog. She asked me whether or not I'd talked about some of the events that had happened this spring at PSR. I said that I hadn't. She seemed disappointed in me. I explained that I'd not been able to process them yet, and not been able to integrate other people's experiences and my own. As I was telling her about this, and as I thought about it as I walked on the beach today, I realized that this was something I needed to write about. I'd had a blog entry a while back that was too half-formed for me to put out. I think that my thoughts on this issue are, at this point, much better processed, and I'm beginning to understand what the issues are.

This spring, a number of incidents happened that brought the issue of racism to a head on campus. A number of insensitive things were said, or done (for instance, an African Catholic nun, in full habit, was asked whether she was the new cleaning person.) Students felt that perhaps, the effort on campus to eliminate racism (called the "Dismantling Racism Committee") was too much of a sideline, and not enough of a central focus for the institution. One of the incidents, which was the singing of an African American spiritual with altered words at chapel, was something that although I don't know the minute details of, what I do know, links directly to my own story. These events came to a head, resulted in a couple of actions: a chapel service where those of us of African descent showed solidarity by wearing traditional clothing, or some item that showed solidarity, and a day of mourning for racism, where people were encouraged to wear black, and be in mourning.

In the end, I think that all of this was very fruitful, if difficult. The issue was brought again to people's attention - it is an issue that tends to be ignored, otherwise. People had to grapple with issues of privilege, and hear about the kinds of things that some people have to deal with every day. Although it should be said that from my perspective, PSR is paying more attention to racism and putting more effort into addressing it than any other institution of higher education that I've ever been a part of (which, by now, is quite a few.) It was, in the end, useful for me, because I am getting a better handle on my own issues and perspectives about racism.

So back to the incident that connects to my story. I only heard about this second hand, and so I likely have part of the story wrong. But this is how I heard it, and how I understand it, and it will become clear why I have chosen to talk about it, even as unclear as it is. At one chapel service, a traditional African-American spiritual was sung with different wording, to make it more gender inclusive. The different wording as I understand, originates with a common practice in MCC churches to modify the language of some traditional songs. Some people felt that this modification was disrespectful of the African-American tradition from which the song comes (and, thus, considered it at least disrespectful, and possibly racist act to modify the words.)

This is a complicated issue, and feels to me a little like dueling oppressions. This connects to my own story as someone who is both African-American, and thus someone who experiences racism, and queer, thus someone who experiences homophobia. And, it also makes me a member of two communities and cultures, which, in my personal experience and life, have felt very separate.

I came out in the mid 1980s, in a very segregated city (Cleveland, OH). I lived in Cleveland Heights, which was a rare example of an integrated suburb of Cleveland, unlike the rest, which were almost universally segregated (as was the city itself.) Because of the time and place that I came out, as well as my own upbringing in a largely white suburb of New York, and my experience at an almost entirely white college (Bennington,) when I came out, I chose to focus my social energies on the gay community. It was also the beginning of the AIDS epidemic, and there was a lot to do. And, frankly, at varied times of my life, the homophobia that I have experienced in African-American settings has often been worse than the racism I've experienced in queer settings. So, in what was at the time, an unconscious way, I made a choice. I have, most recently, primarily because I am much more aware of my own inner processes, and conscious about my actions and the way I live in the world, become increasingly cognizant of the effects of that choice, both positive and negative.

This is not to say, obviously, that in any way, I denied my ethnicity, or denied that I experienced racism. And it's not to say that I don't identify as African-American. It's just to say that culturally, I tend to feel more lesbian than I feel African-American. Of course, in the end, I'm both, and they are inseparable. But the realities of our society seem to often mean that I have to make a choice.\

This last semester at PSR has been very instructive to me about that choice. PSR is a place that has, for varied reasons (most of which, I think honestly, have not a whole lot to do with PSR) been able to get over the hump of being completely welcoming to gays and lesbians, but has had a much harder time with race. I have, in general, felt completely at home at PSR as a lesbian. PSR has a disproportionate share of gay, lesbian and bisexual students.\ \ The colleague mentioned above said to me at one point that eventually, that choice that I made will hurt me. And I realized something really important at that moment. On one hand, the choice has already hurt me. It hurt me the minute I made it unconsciously 20 years ago, and the society which made it necessary to make that choice has hurt me ever since. What I came to realize was that choice doesn't have to make me suffer.\

We live, especially those people who don't have the privilege of race, class, heterosexuality, or ability, in a world of hurt. Actually, I think everyone does, but some people end up hurting more than others, and this society seems to have a way of unequal distrubution of hurt.  But suffering, that is, experiencing that pain in a disruptive, overwhelming and oppressive way, is, at some level, something we have a little bit of control over. Both the writer of the African-American spiritual "My Help" (which was the subject of the incident mentioned above) as well as His Holiness the Dalai Lama, the leader of a people who have been showered with hurt, have some wisdom about this. We can choose to respond to the pain in a way that causes us more pain and suffering, or we can choose to respond to the pain in a way that helps us transcend it.

Without question, we live in a context that promotes all sorts of forms of oppression. But I meet people one at a time. I will assume that each person I meet, until proven otherwise, like me, is imperfect and makes mistakes, but is of good intent. I had a great exchange with a fellow student on the last day of one of my classes. He'd said something that I felt didn't reflect what I knew about his attitude about race. While we were sitting at the back of the class, I just gently told him what it sounded like he'd said. We talked a bit, and he appreciated my coming to him with this, and not letting it fester. I heard a little bit about his perspective and experience, and he heard how what he had said (mistakenly) made me feel. We both grew.\

This is a choice I am making. And I think it's the right one, at least for me. I personally can't (and, honestly, don't want to) tackle racism on an institutional or societal level. As I've said before, it's not my job. But I can come to each interaction, and each relationship I have with consciousness, compassion, and a desire to be honest and real.\

Asilomar

On 20 May, 2006 By mpm

I'm sitting in one of those big camp living room kinds of things, with a huge fireplace, and a bunch of peole sitting in chairs, and lots of activity around. I'm at Asilomar, the conference center in Pacific Grove, CA, on the ocean, near Monterey. I'm at the Annual meeting of the Northern California Nevada Conference of the United Church of Christ. I'm skipping out on the business meeting, since I'm not a delegate, and I pretty much know how those sorts of things go, I don't feel like I need to experience it. It seems like this would be a great place to do conferences. I'm not so sure I would like this place as a general vacation sort of spot - although apparently, people do that.\

It's been interesting, and mostly fun. It's interesting to meet a wide range of people, both people who are lay leaders of their congregations, as well as clergy and other students (I met a student from Yale Divinity - her home church is in Northern California.) The theme for the conference has been "Covenant." An incredibly pleasant surprise was an amazing presentation/liturgy/worship service from Marcia McFee, who is a worship leader Extraordinare. She is incredibly imaginative, and she makes being thoughtful and deep a lot of fun, and packs an incredible amount of wisdom in what she does. Why it was such a surprise was that she is a member of my church, and I had no idea that this was her work!

Tomorrow, I go to PSR graduation, to volunteer, and see some friends off. Plus I get to hear Ann Lamott speak, which I'm looking forward to.  

I feel weird ...

On 16 May, 2006 By mpm

because I'm blogging, but not for procrastination. That is, I'm DONE!! I handed in a final take home exam in the big Bible class that I keep mentioning. I turn in my last paper this afternoon (it's already printed out, I have nothing more to say,) and I had one little tiny annoying form to get signed by my advisor.

It feels very strange. No deadlines, ~~nothing to read~~ (oops, I have a chapter of Gershom Scholem to read for the last meeting of Jewish Mysticism on Thursday.)  But it is definitely like that running off a cliff feeling - I'm still running, and will fall soon.

It means that perhaps, tomorrow, I can GO TO THE BEACH!!! I think I will do just that, too. I'll take my Scholem with me. 

Please, please. Stay home!

On 15 May, 2006 By mpm

Apparently, there is a fair bit of furor in conservative Christian (i.e. Religious Right) circles about what's happening in the government. They are not happy that their agenda has not been more forcefully put forward by the administration. And they are threatening to withold their support for the Republicans, if they don't do more. Republicans seem to be scrambling, but it may not be enough.\

What is fascinating to me, is that it seems they (the conservative Christians) think that their agenda is somehow favored by most people in this country, and by threatening the Republicans that they will stay home on election day, that the administration will somehow turn around. But what they are forgetting is that not only do most people not agree with them, Bush, because of his low popularity, has basically no political capital left to use. And Congress doesn't have much, either. They seem not to realize that Bush is the best they will ever get, in terms of pushing their agenda.\

So yes, please, please, stay home, so that the Democrats can win back Congress, and we can start on the long, slow process of recovering from the worst president in history. 

Boiling Frogs

On 12 May, 2006 By mpm

With sincere apologies to frogs, here's the metaphor: You can't just put a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will simply jump out of the pot. You have to heat the water slowly, so that the frog doesn't quite notice it's being boiled.

This is exactly what is happening to us now. Not so long ago, we heard the prez say something like "If Al Queda is calling you, we want to know." Many of us were alarmed at the prospect that the government was, without warrents or probable cause, listening into international phone calls. Then we got wind that some of those phone calls could be domestic. Now we find out that the NSA has been gathering the largest database in history of domestic phone calls. This is, supposedly, to "analyze calling patterns in an effort to detect terrorist activity."  We are supposed to believe this?

Just think about it. These are domestic phone calls. They expect to try and figure out patterns of calls to detect terrorist activities in domestic phone calls? As I recall 19 people were responsible for the September 11 attacks. If, for some strange reason, they were stupid enough to do all of their planning by phone, they actually think they are going to be able to tell anything about that by analyzing phone records? Are they completly out of their minds? How are they going to distinguish the  10-20 new people who are planning an attack from the 35 people in some local church calling each other about a picnic, or the 45 people in a phone tree of an organization who is closing during a snow day, or the 200 people calling into a conference call, or the people planning a peace demonstration? Oh, that's right, since they've identified the people and organizations doing peace activism as credible threats, they'll definitely know when they are planning something.

An interesting little tidbit from the USA Today article I linked to above:

"The three telecommunications companies are working under contract with the NSA, which launched the program in 2001 shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, the sources said. "

Working under contract? This means that not only are these companies voluntarily giving up our privacy, but they are getting paid for it!

You know things are bad when a commentator on CNN says that Arlen Spector is the only thing standing between us and a dictatorship!!

Update: It gets worse. Now, they are using this to figure out who the anonymous sources for news stories are. It's already bad enough that most news media just goes with the story that the government tells, but any little bits of investigative reporting we do get is now seriously jepoardized.

Second Update: This is belated, but cute. From RevGalBlogPals, a blog for women in religious leadership and their friends.

Calibratethesystem_10_1{width="250" height="124"}

Lesbian tidbits of the week...

On 09 May, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Well, I don't have much time these days, between trying to finish an exegesis paper on Psalm 90 (if you've got any ideas, let me know!), and polish my final project for Christian Worship, which will be a contemplative service. I also have an exam to study for... Sigh. But in 10 days, I'll have a break.

In the meantime, I thought I'd entertain you with two lesbian tidbits, since I don't do this sort of thing very often. And, by happenstance, they fall into the two categories I know something about: science and religion.\

First, for the scientific. A study was published that suggests that lesbian brains work differently than heterosexual women's brains. And, guess what? They work kinda like the brains of straight men, at least within the parameters of the study (it was about pheremones.) This stuff just makes me groan. I admit, I haven't gone and actually read the study, but, based on what I know about every other study trying to look at the ways in which lesbian or gay male brains are different (of course, lesbians are like men, and gay men are like women, and here is the science to prove it...) the initial assumptions of the study poison the results, and surprise, surprise, people find exactly what they expect. And, of course, basing a conclusion "lesbian brains work differently" on 12 people stretches the credibility, just a tad. I do wish they would try a little harder to think a bit more complexly, but perhaps that's asking too much.

I know that for a lot of people, more science saying that being gay or lesbian is biological means that they think that people will just have to accept us for who we are. I think eventually, one way or another, this is going to become a moot point, but I don't think it serves us in the long run to ignore the complexity of human sexuality or gender.

Next, the religious. I think I've mentioned that there are a lot of United Methodists around here, so I've heard all sorts of things about what's happening in the United Methodist Church around how they are dealing with queer clergy, or acceptance of queer people in the pews, and gay marriage. Well, a new mini-storm happened. Apparently, Emily Saliers, none other than one half of the divine (small 'd') band the Indigo Girls, and openly lesbian, was invited to keynote at the annual United Methodist Women's Assembly, along with her dad, the Rev. Don Saliers (they have been doing a lot of speaking and touring lately.) Apparently, some people weren't happy. Get. Over. It.\

Dying Computers

On 05 May, 2006 By mpm With 3 Comments

A couple of weeks ago, my old TiBook (that's Apple lingo for Titanium Powerbook, bought about 3.5 years ago, which recently became my only computer) died a horrible, logic board fritzing, hard drive crashing death. It had been warning me of this for some time. The sound would go on and off, wierd things would appear on the screen, and the hard drive would make bad noises. I had hoped to hold out until later in the year, when the iBooks would be replaced with MacBooks, which would be a cheaper alternative to the MacBook Pros. But, it didn't hold out, and they didn't release the MacBooks soon enough, so I found myself with the sad (yeah, right) choice of buying a MacBook Pro, since a computer is basically about as necessary as books and pens for seminary, and I wasn't about to buy a laptop with Windows on it, even if it is cheaper.

So, it is a very sweet machine, even though I'll be paying for it for a while. I'm not interested in Boot Camp, since I don't really intend to run Windows, really, except perhaps if there is a fun game. I do intend to use Linux, however. I've been experimenting with Parallels, which works amazingly fast, and I have both Windows and Ubuntu Linux installed on it.

There were a few nasty surprises. NeoOffice, which is the version of Open Office for the mac that I've been using, doesn't work with the Intel Macs, so I had to go back to using Open Office within X Windows, which works, but is a bit of a pain. Also, my (ahem) rather old, and mysteriously obtained version of MS Word for the Mac didn't work, so I switched to using Pages, which I mostly like.  At some point, I need to decide whether to stick with Pages, or move entirely to Open Office. Open Office 2.0 and my printer don't really get along especially well, which worries me a little bit. And Pages is slick, but far from a complete word processor. Everything else seems to work just fine, and is it a speedy demon. I haven't yet edited any video on it, but I am sure looking forward to that.\

If you want a bit of fun, have a look at the latest Mac ads. Very funny. 

Audre Lorde

On 01 May, 2006 By mpm

A somewhat serendipitous occurance (two mentions of the same essay, "Uses of the Erotic" by Audre Lorde in a 24 hour span of time, one of which was in my Christian Worship class, in discussions of the history of Queer Theory and Theology - a whole different topic to write on sometime) sent me back to her collection of essays, called Sister Outsider which was published more than 20 years ago. My copy of it (it was, of course, one of the books I kept) is a bit creased, yellowed, and familiar. I hadn't looked at it in quite a while, though. My most salient memory of the book was when I moved to Colorado in 1987, it was in the hands of someone who would later become my housemate and good friend, the first time we met. I remembered that, because I had just finished reading it only a week before.\

I stole an hour or so from my studying over a quiet dinner this evening to re-read a few of the essays. One of the first things that struck me was that she was writing a lot of these things at about the same age as I am now - in her late 40s. And somehow, each time I return to her work, I'm reminded of how she was such an amazing observer and critic of our society. And, ultimately, how timeless her writing is.

I re-read her classic essay "Poetry Is Not a Luxury." Here is one of my favorite quotes from that essay:

For within living structures defined by profit, by linear power, by institutional dehumanization, our feelings were not meant to survive. Kept around as unavoidable adjuncts or pleasant pastimes, feelings were expected to kneel to thought as women were expected to kneel to men. But women have survived. As poets. And there are no new pains. We have felt them all already. We have hidden that fact in the same place where we have hidden our power. They surface in our dreams, and it is our dreams that point the way to freedom. Those dreams are made realizable through our poems that give us strength and courage to see, to feel, to speak, and to dare.

I know that Audre's brand of Black lesbian feminist thought of the 1980s has, in it's time, given way to postmodernism and queer theory on one hand, and womanist theory on the other. But I think there is still so much to learn from her insights.\

Earth Day Meditation

On 29 Apr, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

I'm doing a bit of a first (not really, it just feels that way,) giving a short (5 minute) meditation for a service tomorrow morning at my church. I thought it would be fun to share.

Some Questions You Might Ask -- Mary Oliver\ \ Is the soul solid, like iron?\ Or is it tender and breakable, like\ the wings of a moth in the beak of the owl?\ Who has it, and who doesn't?\ I keep looking around me.\ The face of the moose is as sad\ as the face of Jesus.\ The swan opens her white wings slowly,\ In the fall, the black bear carries leaves into the darkness.\ One question leads to another.\ Does it have a shape? Like an iceberg?\ Like the eye of a hummingbird?\ Does it have one lung, like the snake and the scallop?\ Why should I have it, and not the anteater\ who loves her children?\ Why should I have it, and not the camel?\ Come to think of it, what about the maple trees?\ What about the blue iris?\ What about all the little stones, sitting alone in the moonlight?\ What about roses, and lemons, and their shining leaves?\ What about the grass?

Meditation

The radical creation theologian Matthew Fox says, "As the ocean is in the fish and the fish are in the ocean, so God is in everything and everything is in God." For those of you that are theology geeks, this is called panentheism, the idea that God is in everything, immanent within all of creation.\ \ I heard an amazing story on the radio a couple of weeks ago, about salmon in the Northwest. Like most people, I know the standard salmon story. They are born in small streams, then they swim down into the ocean, spend some years in the ocean growing, then, finally when they are ready to breed, they head back up to the same stream they were born in, to spawn, then die. What I didn't know, is that the ecosystem of the forests of the Northwest depend upon the salmon. Of course, the bears and the eagles, and other predators depend on the salmon. But there is more. If you were to measure the carbon and nitrogen in trees in Northwest forests, a large percentage is from the ocean. It comes from the predators of the salmon disposing of the carcasses in the forest, which then decompose, and get incorporated into the soil, and that nourishes the trees.\ \ Native Americans of the region understood their dependency on salmon quite deeply. Here is a short poem said by women of the tribe Kwakiutl. It is called...\ \ Prayer to the Sockeye Salmon\ \ Welcome, o Supernatural One, o Swimmer\ who returns every year in this world\ that we may live rightly, that we may be well.\ I offer you, Swimmer, my hearts deep gratitude.\ \ I ask that you will come again\ that next year we will meet in this life,\ that you will see that nothing evil should befall me.\ O Supernatural one, o Swimmer,\ now I will do to you what you came here for me to do.\ \ We sing here "I see the love of God in you, the light of God is shining through ..." Seeing God in everything calls us to see the love of God in each and every dog, cat, leaf, stone, shell, flower, grain of sand, snake, mosquito, fish, maple tree, and kudzu root. Wouldn't we think differently, and act differently if we thought that God was not only in each of us, but in each thing we came across and ate, too? And that, in having God, they have souls?\ \ As we know, we live in a precarious moment. Every step we take, and every decision we make, can have implications for the future health of our planet, and every being on it. This is a moment to pay attention. To see every flower, every leaf, every stone, every lady bug, the seagulls at the beach, the spider crawling up your living room wall, the fish in your tank, the trees in your backyard, the cat crossing your lawn, the grass in your lawn, the ant in your kitchen, the dog who sleeps at the end of your bed, the chicken in your pot, the leaves of spinach in your salad, the worms in your compost, and give thanks to the God that is in them, and the God, that by the miraculous process of evolution, put us all in this place, and in this time, so that we may depend upon one other.

==========================================

========================================

===============================================

=================================================================

End of the Semester and Blog thinking

On 22 Apr, 2006 By mpm

I'm sure you have noticed that I'm blogging less often this past couple of weeks. Well, I am up to my neck (eyeballs?) in schoolwork, have varied life happenings, and, generally, I simply have less time to blog. So I'll be blogging a lot less over the next month. Summer is coming, though, and I am very much looking forward to a summer off, some travel across the country, and time to relax, and integrate all of the intense happenings over the past 18 months.\ \ \ I also have been thinking a lot about what my blogs are for. I posted a while back, some thoughts about the uses of blogging.

I'm thinking now, about three principle reasons to blog:

Keeping friends, family, acquaintances and interested parties up to speed on my life\

Continue interactions and conversations in the progressive religious blogosphere\

A space to think and talk about topics of interest to me. This, I think, has some separate sub-reasons:

  • Develop and express political and social ideas (my prophetic voice)
  • Develop and express intra- and interpersonal concepts\
  • Express spiritual experiences, and develop and express theological concepts

But I want to be more clear, more intentional in my blogging. I'll let you know where this thinking leads.\

technorati tags: school, blogs

Blog Category: 

Personal

Weblogs

Continue Reading

Forced to watch advertisements??

On 18 Apr, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

According to a patent filing, Phillips (an electronics company) has invented a method, using existing technology, to stop you from either changing the channel, or fast forwarding through a recording, during a commercial. Yes, you heard me right. I imagine it might also prevent you from using the mute button.

So now, no only is there nothing of any substance or use on television, they expect to force you to watch commercials (or, of course, you can pay to get that 'feature' removed.)  But, actually, I won't notice, since I don't watch TV.

What I find fascinating is that as network television gets fewer and fewer people watching it, since more people watch cable, watch TV shows on DVD, or from iTunes, or downloading, or they just spend more time surfing the web, they are inventing things that are more likely to drive people away from TV. Does that make any sense? 

technorati tags: television, advertisement

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

Via Crucis Grid Blog Station 8: Jesus meets the women of Jerusalem

On 12 Apr, 2006 By mpm

Viacrucisgridblog06{width="400" height="168"}

I was among the crowd, and they were jostling me around. I tried to stay close to the edge of the road, so I'd see him coming. My friends, all women, were standing around me, and we were holding each other for support. "Did you get to talk with him last week?" one asked me. I hadn't. I'd missed him entirely because I was off running an errand, buying a new goat. I now regretted how I let something so trivial get in the way of something so important.

"Here he comes!" someone shouted. I saw a phalanx of centurions, with their shiny armor and pikes, marching in step. There seemed to be many others in the moving group, so it was hard to see him. But he was there. He looked so small, inside that circle of centurions. So fragile, weak. Not like I'd seen him last, a few months ago. He was strong, and was doing a pretty good job of facing down my older brother the Pharisee. He now looked so tired, so weary, so broken.

Behind him, there was a tall man carrying the cross - struggling to keep up. Every once in a while a centurion would crack his whip, so that the poor man would push himself forward. There were some in the crowd that were spitting at Jesus, mocking him, taunting him. My friends and I pushed forward, wanting to provide him with comfort, with some level of support. He'd been so good, and so understanding with us over the year that we'd followed him. He looked up, looked in my eyes, and I knew, at that very moment, that everything would be OK.

(Some of you may not know what the Stations of the Cross are. Wikipedia has a nice entry, which is a good introduction to this depiction of the last hours of Jesus' life, and the liturgical significance of it. Station 8 is called "He meets the women of Jerusalem." and is a reference to Luke 23:27-31 which depicts Jesus speaking to some women who are wailing and weeping for him.)

Other Via Crucis Posts today: (7) His second fall Annie, Jonathon, Jason, PmPilgrim   (8) He meets the women of Jerusalem Dry Bones Dance, Jonathon, Jason

Tomorrow (9) His third fall RonJonathon, PmPilgrim    (10) He is stripped of His garments Ron, Mark, Jonathon, Church Geek

Blog Category: 

Religion

Continue Reading

Can you say "sampling bias"?

On 12 Apr, 2006 By mpm

The Washington Post today has a story, which they title "Most Seniors Enrolled Say Drug Benefit Saves Money." In the first paragraph, they say:

Millions of senior citizens have not signed up for and do not know much about Medicare's new prescription drug benefit, but among those who have enrolled, three-quarters said the paperwork was easy to complete and nearly two-thirds said the program saved them money, the latest Washington Post-ABC News poll shows.

OK, so the ones that managed to sign up (over half haven't) thought the paperwork was easy and most of them saved money. This poll means absolutely nothing. Perhaps many seniors didn't sign up because they realized after number crunching that they wouldn't save any money. Some might not have signed up because, for them, the paperwork was too hard. No where in this article do they suggest that the millions that didn't sign up might be different than those that did.

An article in the New England Journal of Medicine begs to differ with the sentiment of the Washington Post. A salient quote:

Despite its youth, the Medicare drug benefit is already chronically ill. But with extensive rehabilitation, it could go on for years, albeit with impaired functional capacity. Debate continues over whether its early spasticity was caused by inept management of its birth or a genetic disorder present at its creation. Proponents of the first explanation suggest that Medicare and its private insurers were not ready for the millions of applicants and hundreds of millions of prescriptions that poured in early in January, in a flood that they were ill prepared to handle. The layer of insurance companies inserted into the process in the name of efficiency exacerbated the confusion. An administration and Congress guided by Ronald Reagan's principle that "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem" put his vision into practice in a chillingly convincing way.

I'm happy to report that my old home state of Massachusetts has started a different ball rolling, by passing new legislation which virtually guarantees everyone health insurance coverage. Yay!!\

technorati tags: medicare, healthcare, polls, massachusetts

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Politics

{.post-icon .standard}

Holy Week, and what it's like to be observant but theologically radical

On 10 Apr, 2006 By mpm

Yesterday, Palm Sunday, was the beginning of Holy Week. This is, basically, the first time I've observed Holy Week in any sense of the word. When I was a kid, growing up, and when I was a fundamentalist I remember Palm Sunday, and Easter, but nothing else registered. And from what I could tell, it was Christmas that was the most important holiday of the year. Then, of course, I ignored the whole thing except for noticing the chocolate eggs and chicks arrive at the store. Then, as a Unitarian Universalist, basically, the whole thing never really registered except that we had really nice balloons and a cool flower ritual on Easter Sunday.\

This year, since I kinda sorta observed Lent (that's another whole long story I'll write about sometime,) Holy Week has made quite the imprint in my life. During this week in our morning Lectio Divina practice, we're doing the sections of Mark's gospel relating to the last week. I'm going to a Holy Thursday service (which will have foot washing and communion, how cool is that?) a high church Good Friday service at Grace Cathedral in SF,  and then stuff on Sunday.

I'm doing all of this on purpose, really. See, this is the deal. I can't and won't take the whole "Jesus died for our sins" thing at anything even remotely close to face value. I could spend a lifetime unpacking those 5 words. Every single one of those words are at least five questions, not an answer. And, truth be told, I don't think that for me, there really is only one answer to any one of those questions.  And what's turning out to be true for me, is that it is practice, which, in this case means both my daily contemplative practice, and worship a couple of times a week, that helps me look at those questions, connects me with the most direct (for me) avenue to ask and explore those questions: God. I guess that's why I'm a mystic. And, this sounds hauntingly familiar. It was practice that connected me with any understanding of Buddhism I managed to come away with. This seems to mean that for me, spiritual practice is the core of my spiritual life.\

I'm turning into a Christian that is, in the greater scheme of things, somewhat unusual. I said, not so long ago, that I thought that Protestants spent too much time on faith, and not enough time on practice.  Most Christians that are observant in terms of spiritual practice are pretty conservative theologically. Most Christians who are progressive or radical in their theology are not especially observant (like most mainline Protestants, for example.) I imagine there are Christians who are not observant, but theologically conservative. But the quadrant I find myself on the far end of, is the quadrant of those that are observant, that is, do a lot of spiritual practice, but are theologically progressive or radical. And that is a really interesting place to sit. I know that I have company. There are folks here at PSR who are in a similar place. (And, actually, a lot of Episcopals sit here, too.) And I wonder, given the new interest in things like Taizé services (a contemplative ecumenical service,) Lectio Divina, Centering Prayer and Christian meditation, that perhaps more people are beginning to populate this quadrant.

Anyway, one more note about Holy Week. I'll be blogging as part of the Via Crucis (Stations of the Cross) grid blog project.  I'll be blogging on Wednesday on station 8, "He meets the women of Jerusalem."\

technorati tags: religion, easter, lent, christianity, viacrucis

Blog Category: 

Personal

Religion

Continue Reading

And what good is blogging?

On 10 Apr, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

Ages ago in  "blog time" (that's about a month) Beth wrote a blog entry, called "Blogging as Professional Development." Not too long later, when I was talking with Cindy about my upcoming work next year as an intern at Fairfax Community Church, and expressing the (at this point, mild) stress of thinking about writing sermons, she said I had no excuse - I had lots of sermon material already at hand.

This lead me to think about what blogging means to my professional career (which, at this point is simply my career as a seminarian) and what it means to be a blogging professional. In her post, Beth talks about reflection, and how blogging allows for the expression of what comes from reflection about experiences, or new learning. 

There are an increasing number of religious leaders who blog, although most are relatively young. But it's interesting to watch what they write, and how, and why. And it will be interesting to watch whether or not, and how, my blogging changes as I move forward on this path. And it will also be interesting to see how we all, as blogging religious professionals, interact with each other in this medium.\

technorati tags: blogging, professional, religion

Blog Category: 

Personal

Seminary

Weblogs

Gospel of Judas

On 07 Apr, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

With impeccable timing, National Geographic has published the text, and a lot of information on a recovered codex, which contains something called "The Gospel of Judas." It's considered the biggest find in ancient Christian related text since the Nag Hammadi Library, discovered in 1948, and popularized by Elaine Pagels and others, containing the Gospel of Thomas. Apparently, this text was written around the same time as the Gospels of Matthew, Luke and John, and provides a different view of the relationship of Judas to Jesus. The text is Coptic, which is the same language as the Nag Hammadi Library. Coptic is an acient Egyptian language. A lot of texts have been preserved from Egypt, because of its very dry climate.

It's worth having a look at the National Geographic site, it gives you a good idea of the context, the fragments of codex themselves, and what kind of work is involved in recovering old text like this. 

I haven't delved much into the whole issue of this Gospel, and I haven't read much of it yet. In general, I'm pretty interested in exploring the wide range of non-canonical texts that exist. For one, it shows the incredible range of theology in the early church. I'm hoping at some point I'll find a class on this stuff.\

I think for me, one of the most interesting questions (of course this all is predicated on the notion that there was someone called Judas that betrayed Jesus) is that if, according to core Christian doctrine, Jesus had to die, then in what way really was Judas a traitor? And in what way did he have free will? I'm sure there are many theologians who've grappled with this, and I just haven't read them yet, but I've found that whole thing to be really interesting - Judas is the infamous betrayer, yet the betrayal was, according to doctrine, necessary. That's pretty fascinating stuff.\

technorati tags: bible, christianity, jesus, judas

Blog Category: 

Religion

All the fuss about Boot Camp

On 05 Apr, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

Those of you who are Apple fanatics like me have already heard the news. Those of you who are just garden variety Apple users should know about this. And the Windows users should perk up your ears. Those of you that run Linux, well, go get some coffee, maybe.\

This is one of the biggest earthquakes in the Apple world that I can remember (and I've been an Apple user since 1978, although I'd say I've only actively followed the doings of apple since the mid 80s,) up there with, in recent memory, Apple clones, OS X, the switch to Intel chips. What happened was that Apple released new software, called Boot Camp, that allows you to run Windows and Mac OS X on the same machine (not at the same time, but I'm sure that's not too far down the pike.) And it will be an integral part of the new release of OS X, called Leopard (10.5 - won't they running out of cat names soon? And when is OS XI due?)

There are all sorts of theories flying about this. Is it a way for Apple to finally make inroads in the business market? Is it a way to recover from the losses in educational market share? I think it's a bit of both of these, but mostly, I think it's about consumers. Consumers have always been the most important market for Apple, and it's been their main focus (that link is a really good article that argues that MS is in the bind it's in with Vista because of Apple.) The main reason why there isn't a Macintosh in every home is that Jane Q. Public is running Windows at work, is used to Windows, and needs to log in to the corporate network/read a document/run an application/what have you. So JQP buys a Dell, or a Toshiba, so that she doesn't have to think about whether or not she can work at home. But now, with Boot Camp, JQP gets to have her cake, and eat it too. And there is another big one. Imagine thousands (millions?) of desktops and laptops with OS X and Windows installed. Users switch back and forth. It's my bet that OS X will just shine in that kind of comparison, especially with the continued, ongoing security issues dogging Windows and IE.\

No question, there are vendors right now preparing to sell you Intel Macs with both OS X and Windows on them. In the beginning, this will not at all diminish Windows sales (in fact, I imagine there might be a small uptick) but the long term prospects for Windows are chilling, especially if they come out with a new release of Windows that is very late, and far from spectacular, which Vista looks like it will be. It will be fun to watch.

What's your take? 

technorati tags: apple, macintosh, windows, osx

Blog Category: 

Technology

Continue Reading

Scholar's Instincts

On 05 Apr, 2006 By mpm

One of the very neat things I've learned in the last few weeks of writing a biblical exegesis (basically, interpretation) paper, is that somehow, even though this is a completely different field, my scholars tools still work, and I still have what I'll call 'scholar's instincts': whatever that is inside my head that leads me inexorably forward in researching a topic.

In some ways, I can get lost at sea. I'm doing my paper on Luke 10:25-37. I was beginning to read an article on that piece of scripture (called a pericope) when the article I was reading got all Greek on me. Literally. I put it down. And also, it feels like there isn't a lot to stand on sometimes. In science research, there always seems to be some place where you can make assumptions about a foundation, and move foreward from there (even though, of course, that is sometimes a bit false security). But with biblical research, sometimes it all feels like it's sitting on a surface of soup, ready to sink into the muck.

But, be that as it may, one of the bad things about my scholar's instincts, and the way I've been trained, is that I'm basically having to constantly remind myself when I'm doing the research that I'm writing a 10 page paper, not a dissertation. I guess there are worse things. 

technorati tags: bible, exegesis, research

Blog Category: 

Seminary

Tidbits

On 03 Apr, 2006 By mpm

I've been recuperating from being sick. I'm slowly on the up and up, but this is why you haven't heard from me lately. Anyway I have quite a few little things that are worth attention.

  • I'd never heard of DocuTicker, but it's a great site.  If you are a data junkie (I don't quite yet fall into that category) you'll love this site. It's put together by a company called ResourceShelf which is "Information and News for Information Professionals" (read librarians - you all know I have a soft spot in my heart for librarians). They compile all sorts of reports put out by all sorts of governement agencies and nonprofit organizations, like this report from the Pew Hispanic Center on our immigration issues. Anyway, the DocuTicker's feed is mosdef worth a place in your newsreader.
  • The National Council of Churches put together their annual yearbook (in print, so 1990s,) which, interestingly enough, appears to suggest that the Emergent Church, and Blogging, are the two biggest trends right now. Chuck Currie has more details.
  • People are getting all upset about The Da Vinci Code again, already. These people have neither a sense of literature, nor a sense of humor, and everything feeds their persecution complex. Give it a rest, please!
  • And, in the breaking news department, Tom Delay dropped out of his re-election race. Some people say that even the Republicans are predicting they will lose the House. Woo Hoo!
  • There is a great article in Salon by Amaryta Sen, about the dangers of religious identity. A snippet:"The increasing tendency to overlook the many identities that any human being has and to try to classify individuals according to a single allegedly pre-eminent religious identity is an intellectual confusion that can animate dangerous divisiveness. An Islamist instigator of violence against infidels may want Muslims to forget that they have any identity other than being Islamic. What is surprising is that those who would like to quell that violence promote, in effect, the same intellectual disorientation by seeing Muslims primarily as members of an Islamic world." It is a great read.
  • TreeHugger is having an eco-packaging contest - to figure out the best ecologically sensible packaging in this completely overpackaged world. I'm voting for the Netflix sleeves, even though I know that cost, and not ecology is the important factor.
  • Also over at TreeHugger - those Canadians are always so far ahead of us (or perhaps they are just smarter?) 9 out of 10 Canadians fear that their lifestyles are not sustainable! I wonder what the poll would be like here?
  • Has the weather gone bezerk? Or am I imagining things? One one hand, it hasn't rained so much in California in 100 years. On the other you have a group of storms that kill 23 people in one day. Yikes.

technorati tags: politics, data, davincicode, churches religion

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Politics

Religion

From the Divine to the Digital

On 28 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I was chatting with a friend at one point, and he said something like "so you're paying more attention to the Divine than the digital." I kinda like that. Anyway, this post, in a rare moment these days, is about the digital.

What's starting this off is the brou-ha-ha about Windows Vista, which is the newest version of Windows, that was supposed to be out by now, but is not going to see the light of day until 2007.  Microsoft employees are even up in arms about it. One of the big complaints about Windows Vista has been that there really isn't much there there. Vista has an updated user interface, called "Aero", which, actually looks alot like that other OS. And, in one person's view, "Windows Vista Beta 1 is a much-needed demonstration that Microsoft can still churn out valuable Windows releases, after years of doubt." Wow, that's really profound.

My guess is that for most consumer Windows users, this is really not a big deal. More and more Windows users are switching to Macs (especially given the switch to Intel chips), but the delay of Vista probably won't make much of a difference. Where this becomes interesting, I think, is in big enterprises, which have been using Linux more and more over time. Will this delay mean perhaps they might begin to move to Linux? I don't know, but it might be interesting to watch. And, since Microsoft can't seem to move quickly in response to security vulnerabilities, I'm wondering how long people will be patient with that.\

The second story is about Apple. Apple uses a codec (called AAC) which in connection with FairPlay, protects the content that they sell on the iTunes Music Store. Because that creates a monopoly (content sold on the ITMS is only playable on iPods) France wants Apple to open it up, so that other devices can play content from ITMS. If they don't do this, they can't sell content in France. France also wants Sony and Microsoft to open up their proprietary formats as well, so that all devices and content can play nice. Many are hailing this legislation, for a variety of reasons. But some people think it's not likely to spread far. The reason why anybody should care, is that this is one more voice in the argument about Digital Rights Management - that family of technologies that is increasingly infringing on our rights to listen to and watch creative content in any way we'd like, on any number of devices we own, etc.

OK, back to the Divine.  

technorati tags: apple, microsoft, windows, itunes, itms, macintosh, osx, france

Blog Category: 

Technology

Continue Reading

My newest metaphor

On 28 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I am a fan of metaphors. I think I got to really appreciate them as I learned to use them in teaching. They also became pretty valuable to me in understanding my own internal processes.

I have a new one, one I really enjoy.

You have two people, and a plan for a building, and all of the neccesary raw materials (but really raw - sand, metal ore, trees). You explain to each person that the plan doesn't need to be exact, given the difficult nature of the assigment, but that the assignment is to build something along the lines of the building plan. One person dilligently refines the ore, and shapes it to make metal, heats up the sand to make glass for the windows, cuts down the trees, and shaves the bark, and planes the wood, you get the picture, and builds the building pretty much according to plan. You'd think that person was pretty smart and able, wouldn't you?

The second person, though, doesn't do any of that. They put a very, very few things together (somewhat mysteriously), and stand back, and the little process they created causes the building to build itself. And along the way, it turns out, that not only do buildings along the lines of the plan get built, but several other kinds of buildings too - smaller houses, garages, big mansions, warehouses, etc., all seem to spring up all over the place. Indeed, the buildings are also full of furniture, and fixtures, and clothing, and everything anyone needs to move in.

Which person is the better builder?

You might have figured out by now that this metaphor is the metaphor of the creationist's God (person #1) compared to the evolutionist's God (person #2). Since we can't possibly imagine what process might have been put in place to start the long chain of events from big bang to big brains, some folks seem to need to suggest that it must have been done the way the first builder built it. Talk about underestimating the talent of builders.\

technorati tags: God, creationism, evolution, metaphor

Blog Category: 

Religion

Science

We've got to do better than this

On 26 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I've been recouperating from a nasty cold (I'm still kinda sick) so you haven't seen many posts from me lately. I have come across a few things that are somehow tied together in my mind, and point to the ways in which religion can bring out the worst in us, even as all religious traditions seems to be about bringing out the best in us.

The first is from Tricycle Blog, which is the blog written by the editors of Tricycle magazine - a buddhist magazine that has great articles. This is a story that surprised me, but, apparently from the authors, it's not a surprising thing. In Thailand, a young man tried to destroy a statue of a Hindu god, and was killed by a mob. It's an article worth reading, especially if you have Buddhist leanings.

The second story I found in Radical Torah, which is a blog that, in their words, "features multiple takes on parshat hashavua (the weekly Torah portion), as well as commentaries on holidays, rituals and various concepts in Judaism, as seen through the lens of progressive religious and political viewpoints." It's a really cool blog, worth a read.  Anyway, the story is about one of Israel's leading rabbis, who said:

You cannot mix pure with impure. Of course we have to keep apart from all the other nations. You must stand in the breach and prevent this. One cannot mix light with darkness. The people of Israel are pure. The Arabs are a nation of donkeys. They are an evil plague, an evil Satan, an evil pestilence.

There is more detail in the article, and it's definitely worth a read.

The next story is about the man in Afghanistan who was possibly going to be sentenced to death for apostacy. He converted to Christianity 16 years ago.  It appears that they are going to manage to sidestep the whole issue (he has been considered unfit to stand trial, and taken to a hospital, which doesn't do him any good, but avoids an international incident.) One of the unfortunate side effects is that this makes Islam continue to appear extreme, when there are a diversity of voices in Islam about this. It's kinda like the Christian fundamentalists getting to speak for all Christians (gee, isn't that familiar?)\

And finally the last story is about Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, who has been making a name for himself calling Islam an evil religion, which continues to fan the flames of anti-islamic, and anti-arab sentiment in the US. (BTW, that link is to a mediamatters.org story that is pretty interesting in terms of media bias.)   

There was a opinion piece in the LA Times, by the writer Nora Gallagher, who is a pretty well known writer.  The piece, called "Cutting at Christianity" starts out with her bristling at things that really aren't a big deal (like a woman who complains about crucifixes in an episcopal school, or the cartoon that went around after the 2004 election, with the red states as "Jesusland".) She feels like it's politically correct now to criticize Christians. Yeah, sure, so what? She actually goes into depth in the second part of the piece about all of the reasons why people don't like Christians, and, in her words, "The connection between Christianity and political power is enough to make this believer hang her head." From my perspective, this country is so dominantly Christian in culture and belief, that we don't get to complain when people criticize us. Complaining is divisive, not helpful, and feeds into the persecution complex of fundamentalists. What we do get to do, and what we do need to do, is, as she also says in her piece, is practice "costly grace" instead of "cheap grace" - doing instead of saying. She did send a nice reply to my email to her about this op-ed, and I hope we can be engaged in dialogue about it at some point.

Why do these all connect for me? It seems that moments when people feel that their religious beliefs or practices, or the religion itself, is being attacked or threatened, or, really, is just better/more right than everyone elses, instead of a loving, inclusive approach, people reach for their weapons, whether it be actual weapons, or their words. It's no wonder that people who are secular look at religions and forget all of the positive stuff, and just shake their heads. And, ultimately, the bottom line is that none of this really is about religions themselves, or about God, after all, is it? It's about human beings, our attachments, and the ways that we react to things, even when all of our traditions tell us otherwise. I think if you want a really good example of sin, this is it. And, ultimately, this is the sin that threatens the life, safety and freedom of huge numbers of people in the world.\

technorati tags: buddhism, christianity, israel, afghanistan, islam, interfaith

Blog Category: 

Religion

Continue Reading

"Where were we?" and where are we?

On 22 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I was reading the transcript of an interview given by Amy Goodman of Democracy Now!, of Harry Belefonte, who was, at the last moment, disinvited from speaking at the funeral of Coretta Scott King. I think for a lot of people, where the funeral was, and the way in which it happened, wasn't something that sat well with them, particularly that Bush was at the funeral, and spoke. There are some pretty interesting comments he makes in the interview:

Some ministers who were quite angry at all of this said, "Come on down here. Let's -- let's -- We have to talk to the press," and I said, "Talk to the press about what?" "About this. We cannot let it stand." I said, "I don't think that's appropriate. These are the children of my friend. These are the children of the movement. Where did we let them get caught? Why was Bernice giving this kind of sermon? How did you let Reverend Long become the minister of choice? Why wasn't it at Ebenezer Baptist Church, where Dr. King preached? And before we go public and begin to vent our anger, let us understand what role we played in this capitulation that has led to this moment, and let us try first to repair it rather than to go into public discourse.\ \ When do we sit in a circle of healing? When we begin to talk about getting back to where we lost stride. How do we fix this? Not how do we play the vanity game, and get off on going public and talking about how I was crucified. You know, it's what it is, and there is a way in which we have to do this that not only prevents -- I don't know that there'll be another moment quite like that, because Dr. King and Malcolm X and Fannie Lou Hamer, folks like that were so rare that to be a part of the final ceremony of their departure is a rare moment in history, but I think that it goes along with what I have been saying here. What role have we played in letting all this happen? Where were we? What were we doing that had us so distracted? How can it be this way? How did you priests and ministers let the evangelical rightwing Christian forces co-opt the greater truth about Christianity and the philosophy of liberation? And how did you all let that happen, and where are your voices in opposition publicly?\

I also picked up a book recently by Michael Eric Dyson, who is a pretty amazing writer, called "Is Bill Cosby Right?: or has the Black Middle Class lost its mind?" I haven't read it yet (spring break reading,) but I'm really interested in his point of view, which is always insightful. And then I read a recent article in the New York Times (it was covered all over) about the situation of young and undereducated Black men, most of whom are either incarcerated, or unemployed.\

I am, of course, a child of the movement, a person who benefitted from the work of people who went before me. Every time I see a clip of the big march on Washington, I remember that my parents went. And I remember, mostly from reading, and seeing old clips of things (since I was young when it was happening), when the civil rights movemment, which was intertwined deeply with the peace movement and the labor movement, was active, vibrant and working.\

And now, where are we, and how did we get here? We are as in need, as ever, of the movements of the 1960s, but we have splintered, separate movements, with people who don't talk much to each other, more poor people and poorly paid people than ever, at the same time as there is incredible, sometimes extreme, comfort, a growing cancer that is the marriage between the religious right and the Republican party, which has, in Harry's words "co-opt[ed] the greater truth about Christianity and the philosophy of liberation."

Finally, Harry said:

Everybody has a part in this. Everybody has something to look at, and I think it is a collective experience, and that's why I think rather than sitting here drifting, we've got to talk about this, not just where we failed and where you failed, and we've got to come out of this discourse and this discussion, not just talking about it but saying, "Here's where we go," and take courage in the fact that we can turn this around, because the truth of the matter is we are the only ones that can turn this around. Nothing and no one else can do it. Nothing. 

Right on.\

technorati tags: civilrights, corettascottking, harrybelefonte, movements, poverty

Blog Category: 

America

Current Affairs

Religion

Continue Reading

Follow ...

On 20 Mar, 2006 By mpm

... this link. I promise you'll appreciate it!

Thanks Caitlyn!\

technorati tags: politics, connecticut, georgewbush

Blog Category: 

Humor

Christian Koans

On 20 Mar, 2006 By mpm

One of the really cool things, in my mind, about being both religiously pluralistic in perspective, as well as intensely interested in contemplative practice and mystical thought, is that you get to think about how practices and concepts from outside one's own religious tradition can positively impact one's own spiritual practice and journey. I've talked a bit about what I've been learning from Jewish religious and mystical tradition (check out my first midrash,) and I had an interesting thought this morning about koans. In our morning Lectio Divina practice, we read Matthew 5, which has this verse (13): "You are the salt of the earth; but if salt has lost its taste, how can its saltiness be restored? It is no longer good for anything, but is thrown out and trampled under foot."

This is really nothing but a koan. Salt's essense is it's saltiness - if it loses it's saltiness, it is no longer salt.

I think a Christian koan isn't really much like a Zen koan, and shouldn't be structured like one. But I think that the essence of a koan, just like this verse, is that it contains paradox and unexpected twists, that make you really have to think about your own concepts and ideas. I've been doing a fair bit of bible reading lately (gee, I wonder why? Oh, right, I'm in seminary!) It's been a challenge at times to be faced with verses that go against the grain of my own ideas and perspectives about God, the world, and human beings. And it's our ongoing work to not toss out the baby of the kernels of truths and opportunties for thought, contemplation and knowledge of God present in the Bible with the bathwater of text that is sometimes flawed and very much from its temporal context.\

technorati tags: bible, zen, koan, christian

Blog Category: 

Religion

Seminary

Communities of Spiritual Practice

On 20 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I had a great conversation with a friend over cooking dinner last night, about communities of practice, and how much of a difference that makes in terms of one's life, and one's own spiritual practice. She's someone who practices in Thich Nhat Hanh's tradition. We were sharing that the time we spend in communal practice (for her, most mornings at her Sangha, for me, mornings and evenings at PSR doing contemplative Christian practices like centering prayer, lectio divina, and taizé chanting,) makes a huge difference when we practice on our own, and also makes a huge difference in the effects of our practice in our daily life. And it didn't seem to matter at all that we both practice in different traditions - the core concepts about communities of practice we discovered together were pretty much the same.\

Even though I'd been on retreats, and gone sometimes to once-a-week sittings, I'd never been a part of a community of practice on a regular basis like the way I am now. Although I'd been able to maintain my practice earlier this year on my own, doing it in community since early February has made a big difference. It's very sweet, and I am thankful that it exists. It's something that I know I'll have to figure out a way to be a part of for the rest of my life.\

technorati tags: spiritual, practice

Blog Category: 

Personal

Seminary

Continue Reading

Search Terms

On 20 Mar, 2006 By mpm

One of the things I like to do is collect the search terms that people use to find my blog. Sometimes they are not at all surprising (like people who are searching for me, or they might know that my blog name is 'pearlbear' and they are searching for that. Other things are much more surprising.

The most surprising one to me is that one of my blog entries comes up as number 10 on yahoo, when one searches using the term 'nonprofit'. If one searches for 'progressive christian' on MSN, my blog is 8th.  Those amaze me. Interesting terms people have used to find my blog or blog postings include: "stop everything," "Buddhism by Karen Armstrong cliff notes" (that person must be a student!)  "'finding missing people' organization, Larry King Live, CNN" and "William Shatner photos" (really!)

About 1 in 10 of the visits of people to my blog are people who find it via an unrelated search, which is interesting, and sort of surprising. Nothing will change in my blog because at least 10% of people are reading it with no idea of what it's about. But it's something that is good to know.

technorati tags: search, blog

Blog Category: 

Weblogs

Procrastination

On 18 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I'm supposed to be writing 2 papers and studying. But at the moment, I'm procrastinating. I think I've said, my favorite form of procrastination is blogging. My second favorite form of procrastination is futzing with my iTunes library. Well, they've finally come together. I was perusing a rather interesting section of my iTunes library, and here's a little snapshot of what this looks like:Picture_1_3

So which is it? Is God a girl, a real estate developer, or love? For fun, I looked up the lyrics. These are kinda good. From Groove Coverage: "A part of the future, a girl like me, There is a sky, eluminating us, Someone is out there, that we truly trust, There is a rainbow, for you and me, A beautiful sunrise, eternally." It's actually a really nice song.

Then, there is Michelle Shocked: "He may be an absentee landlord. This may be a low rent universe. The roof may need repairs but at last the floor is there. And the rent is not due 'til the first."

And then there is Marvin Gaye, for sure the most traditional of the three: "Don't go and talk about my father. Cause God is my friend. Jesus is my friend. He loves us whether or not we know it. Just loves us, oh ya"

Quite the interesting combination. I think my favorite, though, is "God is a Girl." But I bet you could have figured that out yourselves.

OK, back to writing a paper about the Psalms as lamentation.

Blog Category: 

Personal

Holiness Manifesto

On 17 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I got a heads up from Ethics Daily, a Baptist (not Southern) news source, about a group of denominations that have been meeting for a while, and have come up with a new Holiness Manifesto. Why this was interesting to me was because, in my previous life as a fundamentalist, I belonged to two holiness denominations, the Nazarenes, and the Christian and Missionary Alliance. The Salvation Army, by the way, is in this group. These are pretty serious fundamentalist types. The Nazarenes used to prohibit dancing (I don't know if they still do.)\

So, for reasons that escape me, I decided to go in search for the genuine article (that is, the actual Manifesto; here it is in PDF form.) And I read it. I was expecting the usual fundamentalist stuff, innerancy of scripture, lots of male God language, etc. But, I was pretty darned surprised. In fact, the document is written inclusively (that is, purposely without male pronouns for God!) Read it for yourself, if you are interested. You might be amazed. Here's the punch line:

God wants us to be, think, speak and act in the world in a Christ-like manner. We invite all to embrace God's call to:\ • be filled with all the fullness of God in Jesus Christ---Holy Spirit-endowed co-workers for the reign of God;\ • live lives that are devout, pure, and reconciled, thereby being Jesus Christ's agents of transformation in the world;\ • live as a faithful covenant people, building accountable community, growing up into Jesus Christ, embodying the spirit of God's law in holy love;\ • exercise for the common good an effective array of ministries and callings, according to the diversity of the gifts of the Holy Spirit;\ • practice compassionate ministries, solidarity with the poor, advocacy for equality, justice, reconciliation, and peace; and\ • care for the earth, God's gift in trust to us, working in faith, hope, and confidence for the healing and care of all creation.

The "letter" of this manifesto is, basically, inclusive and progressive. I could almost imagine the UCC, in a moment of being focused on spirituality, perhaps, could almost write something like this. But what, actually, is the "spirit" of this manifesto? When a UCC person talks about the "reign of God" they are talking about a very, very different thing than if a fundamentalist says it (although it is true that many UCC people wouldn't say that at all.) I find the line about "advocacy for equality, justice, reconciliation and peace" especially interesting given the current controversies around gay marriage issues in religous circles. So what do they mean, exactly? Are they being serious? Did they have something else in mind?\

There are other very intriguing lines in the manifesto, like this one:

People in churches are tired of our petty lines of demarcation that artificially create compartments, denominations and divisions. They are tired of building institutions. They long for a clear, articulate message that transcends institutionalism and in-fighting among followers of Jesus Christ.

Which followers are they talking about? Are they really talking about all of them (from the Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox, to the UCC or even UU Christians), or just the ones included in their little group? Who is this for? The language and tone overall of the document suggests that they are talking to everyone (that is, all Christians.) But given what I know about this tradition, it's hard to believe that the spirit of this document extends in the directions the letter would suggest.The critiques stated early in the manifesto are clearly pointed toward things like prosperity gospel and mega-churches, not progressive voices in the church. Then there is this paragraph:

Holy people are not legalistic or judgmental. They do not pursue an exclusive, private state of being better than others. Holiness is not flawlessness but the fulfillment of God's intention for us. The pursuit of holiness can never cease because love can never be exhausted.

I'm intrigued, and will try to keep an eye on this (apparently a book is coming out that was a result of the three-year process that produced the manifesto.) This can only be one of three things: 1) a document only addressed to people within their tradition, and none other, 2) a wolf-in-sheep's-clothing kind of thing - trying to look inclusive and progressive, while not really being so, or 3) a huge sea change. I'm betting on 1 and hoping on 3.

technorati tags: holiness, nazarene, church, christianity

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Religion

Greater Good vs. Personal Gain

On 16 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Two very different articles had something in common: they spoke volumes about how personal gain tends to win over what might be seen as a greater good.

The first one was a surpise. You might have heard about the controversy of the FCC possibly forcing cable companies to offer a la carte channels, instead of the big packages. With this notion, people could pick and choose among non-premium cable channels, instead of getting them all in one package, so they could be picky about what the got (the better, apparently, to prevent kids from seeing smut.) I'd known about this, and knew that a lot of evangelical types (like Concerned Women for America) were very much in favor of this. What I didn't know was that evangelicals are actually split on the issue. Why? Because, in the words of Jerry Fallwell:

Though well-intentioned, the fact is that a la carte would threaten the very existence of religious broadcasting and the vital ministry conducted over the television airwaves," said Jerry Falwell, president of the "Old Time Gospel Hour."

Read: "people won't choose the religious channels, so we will lose money."\

The second one was not a surprise at all. Bill Gates, yet again, found varied reasons to deride the \$100 computer that MIT and Google are working on, for children in developing countries. Bill might give a lot of his money away to help varied interesting causes (although a lot of people think that it's mostly his wife we should credit for the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation) but if there are lots of computers to be sold without Microsoft Windows on it (which provides Microsoft with about \$100 per each computer with it,) it doesn't much matter whether or not they will help people in developing countries. Bill would rather those people have fewer (or no) computers, than have more computers without Windows. Like doesn't he already have enough money for one lifetime?\

In this society, personal gain trumps the greater good almost every time (even if the greater good is defined differently than I might want to) I think, if there is one thing that we need to change, it is that one equation. But then, it is that equation that is the heart of modern capitalism. The gain of insurance companies is more important than the health of the country, the gain of Haliburton, et al. is more important than the welfare of Iraqis, the gain of auto companies is more important than air quality. The placement of Wal Mart is more important than the quality of life for 300 plus families in LA. I hope we don't learn this lesson too late.\

technorati tags: capitalism, evangelicals, FCC, billgates

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Continue Reading

Abortion, Religion and the future

On 14 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 3 Comments

I had an interesting discussion today, which reminded me that I'd had a post percolating on abortion for a while, and I might as well get it out. The conversation was at breakfast this morning with my fellow Bentonite (PSR dorm), Matthew Fox, and Rosemary Radford Reuther, who is considered one of the major feminist theologians ever. How cool is that? Matthew is very much hoping for a job with the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC), an organization I've always admired. We were talking about what RCRC was doing, as well as a group that Rosemary is involved with, Catholics for Free Choice. We were talking about how religious organizations should be not only carefully articulating the religious reasoning behind the position of choice, but also a place of pastoral care for women who have to make what is, truthfully, often a difficult decision.

I'd remembered that there were states that were poised to file new bills to outlaw abortions once they thought that the scales were tipped in their favor on the Supreme Court. Somehow, I didn't quite think it would happen so soon. First South Dakota, next Alabama, then, who knows. And the severity of the law is, frankly, draconian.

It will, of course, take years for this all to work itself out, and it appears the law won't go into effect until the Supreme Court hears it. Some anti-choice activist types even wonder whether it was too soon. There still, apparently, is a 5-4 majority in favor of choice on the bench, with Kennedy as the swing. Luckily, still, most people in the US remain pro-choice, although there are definite differences in opinion by religion

Just today, there was a story on NPR about the shifting debate, with this comment: 

Political commentator and columnist Will Saletan thinks that at least part of the problem is that the abortion-rights movement has become tone deaf to the moral ambiguity surrounding the procedure.\ \ "On the other side you have these pro-life folks who think it's murder and the public doesn't believe quite that, but then you have the pro-choice movement that sounds like they think there's nothing wrong with abortion, or you can't make any judgments about abortion," he says.\

As someone who has been a pro-choice activist, I basically agree with this statement. I completely understand why, in general, we don't talk much about how complicated the moral and ethical issues are around abortion. On one hand, we've been pretty darned busy (and still are) just making sure women have the right to have access - and have been afraid, I think (for good reason) that if we articulated these issues, it would be something that the anti-choice folks would jump all over. In that same story, Katha Pollit weighs in:\

Pollitt says that in many cases, abortion isn't bad, and that suggesting it might be sets up a dangerous slippery slope.\ \ "If you go down the road of saying abortion is bad 99 percent of the way, but that last one percent you say, 'But, oops, we think it should be legal, the best of a bad option,' then you're leaving the door right open for 'Well, why is abortion bad?'" she says.\ \ At the same time, she says, calling abortion bad puts the entire moral burden on the women who choose it.

"The man never gets talked about," Pollitt says. "The crusade is not 'Let's make sure every man in America uses a condom every time he has sex, unless he's trying to make a baby.' That discussion is never had." 

I see her point of view too, and really agree about the last part. But I do think that even Katha would agree that abortion is ethically complicated. We have to have that conversation. I think that this might be where we, as religious progressives, get to step in, and bridge the gap. I think, given the new attention being paid to religious progressives, it is incumbent on us to provide our own, relatively unique perspective to this issue, and help articulate why full access to safe, legal abortion is critical to maintain, and also to be able to facilitate true dialogue on this issue across viewpoints.\

technorati tags: abortion, religion, ethics, supremecourt, southdakota

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Religion

Continue Reading

Identity Blogging

On 14 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 3 Comments

I think, by now, if you are someone who is reading this blog regularly,  you've probably figured out that I am both an African-American, and a lesbian. If you are relatively new to this blog, you might not yet have figured out the gay part (since there is a picture of me on the side, the African-American part is pretty obvious.) Of course, if you are a friend or family member of mine, you've known this all along.

For the most part, when I write this blog, and what I want people to get out of this blog, is that it is just the complicated person called Michelle that I want to emerge from these pages. I have self-contradictory points of view, I combine sometimes contradictory identities within myself. I am simply, just me. Not representative of any identity that I might actually have.

Tiffany Brown, author of the blog blackfeminism.org, which is a newish blog for me to read,  raises some interesting questions about blogging and identity. She suspects, and I agree, that people who chose identity blogging, being the "Black gay blogger" instead of a blogger who happens to be Black and gay, means that those people are more of a representative than those of us that choose not to be identity bloggers.

She asks two questions in particular that I'd like to wrestle a bit with here. First "Do you eschew the notion of identity blogging? Is being a black|gay|Asian American|Latino/a|Native|physically-challenged|etc. person who blogs enough to be considered an identity blogger?"

I think for me, the only way I am being an identity blogger in an active sense, is in my identity as a seminarian. I definitely chose to eschew the notion of identity blogging as either Black or gay. But I do think that speaking from my perspective (OK, I'll use our favorite phrase here "social location") as an African-American lesbian, that it can't help but change the way people read my blog. I imagine that it's quite possible that if people read this who don't know too many African-American lesbians, that I might, in fact, become a representative to them of that identity.

The second question feels like the question of my life, just focused on my blog "How do you reconcile your various identities? If you are, for example, a Boricua-Muslim-lesbian-amputee, (how) do you blend those identities on your blog? "

This one I don't have a ready answer for, since I don't have a ready answer for it in my life. Being the African-American-Afro-Carribean-lesbian-Christian-Buddhist-mystic-seminarian-geek-... that I am,  I think the only way that I blend or reconcile these identities on the blog is simply that I choose to talk about an amazingly wide range of stuff, all from my perspective. I don't actively try to reconcile things here.

For me, answering these questions made me think a lot about why I blog in the first place. I remember years and years ago now (in net time), when I first started the blog, back in 2003, it was because I needed an avenue to vent about the war in Iraq.  It then morphed into a way to tell folks about my transitions and travels. And now, I mostly talk about seminary. I'm writing some for my friends and family and some because I think that I have some things to say that people who don't know me might want to hear.\

technorati tags: blogging, blogs, identity,

Blog Category: 

Weblogs

{.post-icon .standard}

Jewish Mysticism, and bloggy miscellany

On 14 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I'm taking this great class, called "Introduction to Jewish Mysticism" which is fabulous. I've been posting reflections that come from the readings and discussions of that class on my ministry blog. The latest reflection is about the ten sefirot, or emanations of God, from the Kabbalah.

If you ever read my ministry blog, (few people do, and that's really OK) you might have noticed  that I changed the title to "The Contemplative and Mystic." I decided to focus my writing there on things relating to contemplative life and practice, and cool new mystical things I'm learning, like from this class.\

On the whole, in looking at my main blog lately, I'm writing a lot less about political events, or the news, or that sort of thing, and more about topics arising out of my seminary experience, religion and society, and my spiritual life. I decided that I'd like to spend more time writing substantial thought peices, and less time re-hashing news everybody already knows, unless it seems especially compelling. This likely means I will be posting less often. I just hope that the posts will be deeper and more meaningful. I'll still, however, tell you when I am in some unexpectedly strange place.

I found out that my Google page ranking is 5 out of a possible 10, which kinda surprised me - I didn't imagine it would be so high. I'm only one step below my buddy Beth's blog. It is, however, an exponential scale, so this does mean that according to Google, Beth's blog is an order of magnitude better than mine, which is about right.\

technorati tags: sefirot, kabalah, blog, Google, pagerank

Blog Category: 

Weblogs

Continue Reading

Sacred Time

On 13 Mar, 2006 By mpm

Have I said enough times how much I'm enjoying seminary? Case in point: today's subject in the Christian Worship class, which was how the church has looked at time over history. There are some fascinating things to think about in terms of our theology of time, and what we want in the rythm of life.\

Having been just recently introduced to the liturgical year (I'm learning most about it on my own, since I seem to have the tendency to ape the medieval mystics as much as possible), I hadn't really understood a lot of what it was all about. But the liturgical year is centered around Easter (the english word, by the way, probably has root in the Anglo Saxon spring goddess, Eastr.) For a long time, the only holidays there were were days set aside for events in Jesus' life, and saint's days. In the 19th century onward in the US, varied civic holidays got fed into the calendar. Protestants, of course, dispensed with the saint's days altogether.

An interesting point was made about our 24/7 culture - it has the effect of eliminating the rythm of life. There aren't defined rest days, or rest times, anything can happen at any time. And, really, is this a good thing? I think about an old friend of mine who is an orthodox Jew, and she arranges her life around the Sabbath - she walks to synagogue, doesn't answer the phone, go shopping, etc.

One of the things that's true of every religion I've ever encountered is that there are times set aside for reflection, spiritual deepening and growth, and community gathering. Maybe this is just a human need, and what makes time some times sacred is that we have listened to the voice we all have, to stop, reflect, play, worship (in our own different ways) gather, and love. I think that's something we could re-discover. I think a 16/6 world wouldn't be such a bad thing, after all. I'd absolutely give up the ability to go shopping one day a week if in return I got a 16/6 world. Doesn't even have to be Sunday. Why not Saturday? Wednesday?\

technorati tags: time, sacred, sabbath

Blog Category: 

Seminary

Biblical, Schmiblical, part II

On 13 Mar, 2006 By mpm

There is a fascinating discussion on the Christian Alliance for Progress blog, on a story about Jerry Falwell, who corrected the Jerusalem post, that had reported that he thought that Jews would go to heaven. He said "I continue to stand on the foundational biblical principle that all people --- Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, Jews, Muslims, etc. --- must believe in the Lord Jesus Christ in order to enter heaven."

The discussion, basically, is about the biblical basis (or lack thereof) for universalism (in shorthand, this is the idea that Jesus died for everyone, not just believers. Most liberal Christians, are, at this point, at least functional universalists) Both sides of the argument are quoting scripture. You could quibble, but the reality is, really, both sides are right, if you read the bible literally. In other words, scripture is far from clear on this subject. There are absolutely things both in the gospels and in Paul's letters which suggest that no one goes to hell. And, there are things both in the gospels, and in Paul's letters, which very much suggests the opposite.

I think we have to call a draw, if we're going to depend on literal readings of the bible for the whole argument. One of the most interesting comments, though, on that discussion was this: "If you are right, then why would Jesus say 'I came not to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance' Mark 2:17 If everyone is going to heaven, why would anyone need to repent of anything?"

Funny. The whole discussion was about something that no one really knows anything about at all. That is, what happes to us after we die. What about what happens right here, right now? For me, hell is life of oppression, hopelessness, meaninglessness, unmet need, and violence. And what we need to repent of is our complicity in creating hell on earth for far, far too many people, sometimes in the name of God.\

technorati tags: religion, Jesus, heaven, hell, bible

Blog Category: 

Religion

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

Can Peter Gabriel Predict the Future?

On 12 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I was reading the story about the amazing "Red Rain" that happened in India in 2001 that people think might be alien life. I then remembered Peter Gabriel's song, "Red Rain", that was on his album "So", which was released in 1986!

Anyway, in case it hasn't sunk in, depending on further research, we are about as close to proving the existence of life outside of the earth as we've ever been. 

technorati tags: redrain, kerala, alien, life, petergabriel,

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Music

Science

Continue Reading

Biblical Schmiblical

On 10 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

One of the cool things I'm learning in "the bible class" this semester (short for "Interpreting Sacred Texts") is that every way of reading the bible is interpretation. And that one very convoluted form of reading the bible is to read it as literally true. In fact, it really takes some mental gymnastics to do it. Case in point: the story of creation in Genesis.\

This has come up, because I just read a post from a site I hadn't read before, about "Biblical Manhood and Biblical Womanhood." Salient quote:

Genesis 1:26-31 tells us of the creation of man. In the creation, man and woman, made in the image of God, entailed them being a walking, talking, breathing witness of God. Biblical manhood and womanhood is essential to them fulfilling their responsibility to be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth. They are reflecting God's truth. Their roles are essential to imaging and representing God in the world. At the outset of creation manhood and womanhood matters for man to image God in the world - to point to a reality of God. Gender, then, is part of the very reason we were created.\ \ In Genesis 2 we see God saying "it is not good for man to be alone..." The Divine definition of being between one man and woman is rooted in these words, "for this reason." What reason? Because the Lord God fashioned a rib out of the man, brought her to the man, and said "here is Eve." Here is the helper that answers the need of fellowship. Marriage is created in the marriage order and. [sic]

I know that some of you know that there actually are two creation stories, not one. I know that fundamentalists like to suggest that there is only one, and Genesis 1 is the general, and Genesis 2 is the specific. But you just simply can't read it that way and remain intellectually honest. There are a number of reasons why. If you look at the Hebrew, the vocabulary used to name God is different, and there are form, and other language differences (Genesis 1 is from what is called the "Preistly" source, and Genesis 2 is the "Jawist" source.) Most simply, the order of creation of both are completely different. There is no way to reasonably reconcile them. In the first story, God creates plants on the 3rd day, and animals on the fifth day, and then, on the sixth day (Genesis 1:27):

So God created humankind in his image,\        in the image of God he created them;\         male and female he created them.\

OK. Keep track of this. In Genesis 1, God creates both men and women at the same time, in God's image. In Genesis two, God creates man after God has already created the garden of Eden. After that, God creates animals, so that he wouldn't be lonely. Right. Created the animals after man. Then God creates woman out of Adam's rib. That directly conflicts with the story in Genesis 1. I don't know how literalists get around this conflict, but it's a problem. And, since the idea that man was created before woman is one of the major foundations of the notion that women are men should not be equal, well, there is trouble in river city.

Of course, humans all got here by a different road (the evolutionary one), but this is just an example of the ways that people (mis)use the bible. As I mentioned before, I'm really enjoying the Jewish approach to scripture, and the ways in which we can find spiritual nourishment from the varied and multiple meanings of text, and often, the literal meanings aren't especially useful.

Isn't it hubris to limit God to the 775,000 some-odd words in the bible? Can we really decide, based on those  very few words, exactly, precisely, what we think is right for everyone? Surely, God, in her grace and love, is bigger than that. I think we have to remind fundamentalists of a literal reading of Luke 10:25-28: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as yourself." Or as the famous Rabbi Hillel said "That which is hateful to you do not do to others. All the rest is commentary."

Link from, who else but Carlos of Jesus Politics.

technorati tags: gender, religion, bible, genesis,

Blog Category: 

Religion

SDS, back again

On 10 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I was just telling a friend of mine a few days ago that one of the things that was different now than in the 60s, was the presence of an active, large, student movement. Well, today, in my email box, comes a note about the reactivated Students for a Democratic Society.

We are activists from around the country who feel that a student movement is desperately needed to carry on the struggle for participatory democracy.  

Right on! 

technorati tags: students, activism, democracy

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Politics

Religious and Secular Left

On 10 Mar, 2006 By mpm

Bruce Wilson, on Talk to Action, has an interesting, and I think quite useful discussion of the issues relating to the ways in which the secular left and religious left talk to each other, and the broader community, and the language that gets used. He's mostly discussing Michael Lerner's new book, "The Left Hand of God," which is for sure on my list of books to read when I have the time. He says:\

As the religious left arises to flex, perhaps, newfound political muscles it would do well to remember that many of the great social justice battles of the last century in America were advanced by a coalition between religious and secular forces. And, the secular left has fewer bearings in the new landscape. So, it may be incumbent upon Michael Lerner's spiritual progressives to reach out - difficult or perplexing though it may seem - to those on the secular left for whom the religious left might now appear to be in a position of relative power.

There are quibbles with his perspective, and I'd say it's incumbent on both sides to reach out, but I think it's quite interesting that he feels that religious progressives now have the upper hand. Worth a read.\

technorati tags: religion, progressive, left, secular

Blog Category: 

Books

Current Affairs

Politics

Bits of cool webstuff

On 06 Mar, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

I've accumulated some neat links and webstuff that I've come across lately that are worth highlighting - things folks might be interested in. You can always check out my del.icio.us links - there's new stuff all of the time.\

  • New Monasticism - I discovered that there  is, apparently, an interesting new movement "an attempt to discern the Holy Spirit's movement in the abandoned places of the Empire called America". They even have a book. Something to watch.
  • An interesting conversation on a new blog I've found, about "identity blogging" (as black, or gay, etc.) vs. personal blogging. I'll have more on that later.
  • Writing about recovery - I came across the website of a writer who is sharing her journey of recovery from childhood abuse. She has a great little manual for caring for one's inner child.
  • A compendium of sacred texts from many, many traditions.
  • Digglicious.com - an addictive tool to find cool stuff - combines del.icio.us and digg. They both are very different, but since they both change fast, there are some cool things that just appear, like a japanese video about how to peel a potato in one step!
  • If you ever wanted to know what liturgical season this is, here's the place to find out.\

technorati tags: websites, tools

Blog Category: 

Religion

Web/Tech

Weblogs

{.post-icon .standard}

Is this just gambling, or am I missing something?

On 05 Mar, 2006 By mpm

I'm no economist, but apparently, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange is now selling "Snowfall Futures":

Snowfall futures and options are geared to a snowfall index focusing initially on Boston and New York. The index will change based on official daily snowfall totals.\ \ Investors can buy and sell contracts trading on a monthly basis from October through April. A trader makes money on a contract when the index rises after it is purchased and loses money when it falls.

Kinda sounds like gambling to me. And then there is gambling with taxpayer money:

"From the standpoint of municipalities or companies that are concerned with excessive snowfall and whether they will have shipment of goods, there's now the opportunity to hedge your removal costs or transportation delays or other weather-related exposure," he said. "CME's had a very good idea on the weather."

What do you think? I'm having a hard time taking this seriously.\

technorati tags: investing, snowfall, hedgefunds, weather

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Environment

Continue Reading

Faith vs. Practice

On 02 Mar, 2006 By mpm

One of the things I'm learning, due to a really fortuitous combination of courses this semester (primarily the combination of the big bible class, and Jewish mysticism) is that I get to do interesting comparisons of Judaism and Christianity. Judaism was of course, the religion of Jesus. What fascinates me most right now is that fact that we share a book (the Hebrew Bible) doesn't mean much. The fundamentals of both religions are quite different.

In my mind, one of the most dramatic (and amazing) differences is the difference between the roles of faith and practice in spiritual life. For Jews, practice is central, faith negotiable. For Christians, faith is central, and practice is negotiable. This is an oversimplification, for sure, but I think it has a nugget of truth in it. I've already talked about the other major difference I see, which is the approach to scripture.\

It has been so rich to be a part of conversations and arguments about deep theological issues (for example, exactly what was it that Moses got at Sinai, anyway?) and understand that those conversations and arguments have been not only going on for a long time, but documented. Deep arguments about Christian theology resulted in accusations of heresy, the burning of the books (and sometimes the people) who lost the argument, or later on, denominational schisms.\

I think that Protestants have been way too concentrated on faith. I understand why this came to be, and it makes all sorts of sense given what was going on in the Catholic church before the reformation. Also,  the reasons most often given for practice (the evils of sin, punishment of God, obedience, etc.) are reasons that, in my opinion, would only serve to distance people from the divine, not bring them closer. Of course, given my Buddhist background, it makes sense that I'd find practice important - and it is a very important (at this point the central) part of my own spiritual life.

I went to a retreat last week, on a practice called Lectio Divina.  The retreat was very good, but what I took away from it, more than the content itself, was that Christians of all theological persuasions (I was in the same room as someone who'd gone to seminary at Fuller) can actually relate to each other really well around practice.\

It would be interesting to think about ways to allow Christians to have those deep conversations about theology with no adverse consequences, as well as return to a place where practice is more central - but for the important reasons - one avenue to closer connection with God.

technorati tags: christianity, faith, Judaism

Blog Category: 

Religion

Seminary

Octavia Butler

On 27 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

2002830973 Octavia Butler, one of my favorite Science Fiction writers, and one of a tiny number of African-American Science Fiction writers, died this weekend.

She wrote a number of books that were really important to me. The first book of hers that I read was called Kindred,  which was an amazing story of a black woman who is yanked backwards in time to help her slave-owning ancestor. I read the books of the Patternist series, including Mind of My Mind, and Wild Seed.

Her two-book series, Parable of the Sower, and Parable of the Talents, were, I think, two of the best science fiction books to deal with the near future, ever published. I haven't yet read her newest book, Fledgeling, but I think it will be on my summer reading list.\

There is a nice tribute on Blog Critics. Here's an obit.

\ \ She is a voice in Science Fiction that will not be easily replaced.\

technorati tags: sciencefiction, octaviabutler, writer, obituary

Blog Category: 

Books

Current Affairs

Progressive Faith Blog Carnival!!

On 26 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Progressive Faith Blog-Con 2006
Carnival{width="297" height="137"}

Well, doing this on a cold rainy February day in Berkeley seems the right thing (for those of you in New England: no, really, I'm not complaining about the weather!)\ \ There are some interesting goings on in the progressive faith blogosphere, as usual. Next week, the carnival is being hosted by one of my favorite fellow seminarian bloggers, Feminary. The week after, it's being hosted by someone with probably among the top 5 coolest blog names, Velveteen Rabbi (and I love her blog, too.)

There is a lot going on right now in our country, domestically as well as internationally. Xpatriated Texan thinks that it's time to bring the troops home. Virushead (another cool blog name) thinks we need to ask Robert Dole about his relationship with Dubai Ports World. Tikun Olam has some interesting comments of his own on the Ports issue. Love Ministries asks us to think about politics and spiritual calling.

The Feminarian ponders about why evangelical Christians don't show up in interfaith conversations. My homie Radical Hapa asks "When Did the Bible Leave the Church?" Chuck Currie tells us about the World Council of Churches assembly.\

Street Prophets is starting a book club! Drat. Why do they have to start when I have no time to read?

Gosh, everyone is having blog awards. The Unitarian Universalists have the UU Blog Awards, the Buddhist blogosphere is having the Blogisattva award, and the Muslim blogosphere has the Brass Crescent awards. And what's cool is that Velveteen Rabbi won for Best non-Muslim blog! Also, check out Progressive Islam - very interesting group of blogs, across a spectrum of Muslim thought.\

Real Live Preacher gives up orthodoxy about homosexuality, and talks about it incredibly elegantly.

Greatful Bear talks about my favorite Gospel.\

I've been doing some interesting thinking about Lent, lately. Boy in the Bands gives us the details on how that ash is dished out, anyway. Another country does some interesting thinking, too, and takes up a new practice for Lent.

In doing this, and exploring, I found a few new blogs I'd like to check out more often:

And, last but not least, I love Dylan's cat blogging (and both her blogs, too!)\

technorati tags: blogs, progressive, religion, faith

Blog Category: 

Weblogs

Continue Reading

Stop. Everything. Now.

On 24 Feb, 2006 By mpm

From Energy Bulletin:

The scientific uncertainty in global warming isn't about whether it's occurring or whether it's caused by human activity, or even if it will "cost" us too much to deal with it now. That's all been settled. Scientists are now debating whether it's too late to prevent planetary devastation, or whether we have yet a small window to forestall the worst effects of global warming.

Our children may forgive us the debts we're passing on to them, they may forgive us if terrorism persists, they may forgive us for waging war instead of pursuing peace, they may even forgive us for squandering the opportunity to put the nuclear genie back in the bottle. But they will spit on our bones and curse our names if we pass on a world that is barely habitable when it was in our power to prevent it.\ \ And they will be right to do so.

technorati tags: globalclimate, climate, earth, environment

Blog Category: 

Environment

Woo Hoo

On 23 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I had already decided to drive the present car I have into the ground, so that by the time I needed a new (to me) car, I would likely be able to afford either a used hybrid, or a used diesel that could converted to biodiesel. Well, imagine my surprise that apparently, a whole new raft of little cars are headed to the US from Japan, one of which is going to be a really cheap hybrid. Treehugger (of course) has a story about the  hybrid verson of Honda's "Fit" car, which is a little thingy. Cute, actually, and not so different than the car I drive now. Nice.

Honda_fit{width="250" height="70"}

technorati tags: cars, hybrid,

Blog Category: 

Environment

{.post-icon .standard}

Have we finally figured out that capital punishment is cruel and unusual?

On 22 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

There have been some interesting developments in the death penalty issue in California this week. Michael Morales was supposed to be put to death on Monday, but that has been indefinitely postponed. The basic reason is this: A judge had declared, based on a study about lethal injection, that California had to change their procedure. Lethal injection is based on the injection of three drugs, an anesthetic, a paralytic, and then Potassium Chloride. The study suggested that if the initial anesthesia wasn't perfect, that a person could be experiencing the incredibly painful process of being killed by the Potassium Chloride, thus constituing, for the Judge, cruel and unusual punishment. The judge said that anesthesiologists had to be present to either make sure the anesthesia was correct, or to administer a huge overdose of anesthesia to kill the prisoner.

However, doctors have ethics, and killing people isn't part of the picture for them. So no doctors would be a part of Morales' execution. Thus it's been postponed indefinitely. And this ruling may effect whether or not executions occur in other states (most states that execute people use lethal injection.) 

The reason that lethal injection has been used is that judges have ruled that other forms of execution are cruel and unusual. Basically, killing people is not very nice for the person being killed, is it? I think it's cruel and unusual.\

technorati tags: deathpenalty, execution, california

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

Progressive Faith Blog Conference and Carnival

On 22 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Progressive Faith Blog-Con 2006
Carnival{width="297" height="137"}

As many of you know, there has been somewhat of an interesting coalescence in what could broadly be called the Progressive Faith movement. It seems to have most of it's center in Progressive Christianity, but there has been a real effort to be more broadly based and inclusive. As well, there are movements within other faiths to be a part of a broad coalition.

Sometime this year, there will be a Progressive Faith Blog Conference, that I hope to attend. In the meantime, they are hosting a Progressive Faith Blog Carnival, which basically is hosted at different blogs, and is a list of the coolest, most interesting blog entries in the Progressive Faith Blogosphere for that week.

Guess what? Next Sunday is my day to host! I'll be gathering posts on my own, as well as taking submissions. If you'd like to point me in the direction of a great post, please email me (michelle at murrain dot net). I'll be posting lateish in the day on Sunday (the 26th.)

technorati tags: blogs, progressive, faith, religion

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Religion

Weblogs

Continue Reading

Another Quiz

On 22 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I don't really "get" enneagrams although apparently, they originate with Gurdjieff, who is someone I've always wanted to read, but haven't gotten around to (and his books always look so intimidating.) Anyway, there's a quiz I found, thanks to Poppy, that looked kinda interesting, and, as you'll see if you know me, is pretty close. So here are the results:

+:---------------------------------------------------------------------:+ | [the Peacemaker]{style="font-size: 1.4em;"}\ | | Test finished! | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | you chose BX - your Enneagram type is NINE. | | | |   | | | | "I am at peace" | | ----------------- | | | |   | | | | Peacemakers are receptive, good-natured, and supportive. They seek | | union with others and the world around them. | | | | How to Get Along with Me | | | | - If you want me to do something, how you ask is important. I | | especially don't like expectations or pressure. | | - I like to listen and to be of service, but don't take advatage | | of this. | | - Listen until I finish speaking, even though I meander a bit. | | - Give me time to finish things and make decisions. It's OK to | | nudge me gently and nonjudgmentally. | | - Ask me questions to help me get clear. | | - Tell me when you like how I look. I'm not averse to flattery. | | - Hug me, show physical affection. It opens me up to my feelings. | | - I like a good discussion but not a confrontation. | | - Let me know you like what I've done or said. | | - Laugh with me and share in my enjoyment of life. | | | | What I Like About Being a Nine | | | | - being nonjudgmental and accepting | | - caring for and being concerned about others | | - being able to relax and have a good time | | - knowing that most people enjoy my company; I'm easy to be around | | - my ability to see many different sides of an issue and to be a | | good mediator and facilitator | | - my heightened awareness of sensations, aesthetics, and the here | | and now | | - being able to go with the flow and feel one with the universe | | | | What's Hard About Being a Nine | | | | - being judged and misunderstood for being placid and/or indecisive | | - being critical of myself for lacking initiative and discipline | | - being too sensitive to criticism; taking every raised eyebrow and | | twitch of the mouth personally | | - being confused about what I really want | | - caring too much about what others will think of me | | - not being listened to or taken seriously | | | | Nines as Children Often | | | | - feel ignored and that their wants, opinions, and feelings are | | unimportant | | - tune out a lot, especially when others argue | | - are "good" children: deny anger or keep it to themselves | | | | Nines as Parents | | | | - are supportive, kind, and warm | | - are sometimes overly permissive or nondirective | | | | [Renee Baron & Elizabeth Wagele]{.small} | | | | [ ]{.small} | | | | [[The Enneagram Made Easy\ | | Discover the 9 Types of People\ | | HarperSanFrancisco, 1994, 161 pages]{.small}]{.small} | | | | [\ | | You are not completely happy with the result?!\ | | You chose BX]{.small} | | | | [Would you rather have chosen:]{.small} | | | | [AX | | (SEVEN)]{.small} | | | | [CX | | (TWO)]{.small} | | | | [BY | | (FOUR)]{.small} | | | | [BZ | | (FIVE)]{.small} | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+


Link: The Quick and Painless ENNEAGRAM Test written by felk on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test


technorati tags: enneagram, personality,

Blog Category: 

Personal

Places I've been

On 21 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I've already told people I'm a sucker for quizzes. Well, I'm also a sucker for blog memes. So here's a new one. The countries and states you've visited...

\ create your own visited countries map or vertaling Duits Nederlands

\ create your own visited states map or check out these Google Hacks.

technorati tags: travel, world,

Blog Category: 

Personal

"Middle class lock-down"

On 18 Feb, 2006 By mpm

This blog is definitely off of my beaten path, but this essay is really interesting. Sometimes, he seems to over-romantasize the past, but there's some good stuff, here. Here are some tidbits:

After all, what can we really do together? Consume. Drink. Consume. Talk. Consume tickets to entertainment. Consume. There is little else to do with other human beings in America than consume. So most of our primary life activity is solitary. We drive, do housework, pay bills, watch television... When we do "get together with friends," there is little to talk about, other than one form or another of consumption, consuming music, or movies or whatever. We can not tell each other anything new because we all get the same news and information from the same monolithic sources.

...

If anyone is going to turn the ship of the republic around, put us on a course more in the direction of liberty and openness, it will require the navigational help of those among us who can still remember what it was like before totalistic capitalism took such grip. People who can remember that genuine good will and intent were once alive in the hearts of most people even if never in the halls of Congress. Remember when at least some human and social progress was evident around us, thereby giving reason to hope.

technorati tags: capitalism, society, consumerism, middleclass

Blog Category: 

America

Current Affairs

(Insert Favorite Swear Word Here)

On 17 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Yet another study came out yesterday suggesting how much we are screwing up the planet.

Greenland's glaciers are melting into the sea twice as fast as previously believed, the result of a warming trend that renders obsolete predictions of how quickly Earth's oceans will rise over the next century, scientists said yesterday.

Sigh.

technorati tags: globalclimate, glaciers, ocean, environment

Blog Category: 

Environment

Continue Reading

My new conspiracy theory

On 17 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I am someone who tends to think that conspiracy theories are sometimes just silly, and generally, gross oversimplifications of a very complex reality. A couple of stories from EFF that came across my e-desk that have made me think up my own conspiracy theory, and it's not pretty. Here's the basic information. Clear Channel (yes, those people) was granted a patent by the USPTO for "System and method of creating digital recordings of live performances." EFF says:

Clear Channel claims that its patent creates a monopoly on\ all-in-one technologies that produce post-concert live\ recordings on digital media and has threatened to sue anyone\ who makes such recordings with a different system.\ This has forced bands like the Pixies into using Clear\ Channel's proprietary technology, and it hurts investment\ and innovation in new systems developed by other companies.

OK, so stick with me for a bit. For a while now, a lot of people have been flabbergasted by the patents that the USPTO has granted, particularly that they have granted patents that allow companies to own business processes that often have clear prior art, and that allow them to have control over the creative innovations of others, in ways that are pretty nonsensical. This one is a great example. This patent means that any musician and venue that records then burns a concert CD for sale after the concert has to use their technologies, or be sued for infringement of their patent. Right, this is completely nonsensical, and clearly violates the right of musicians to control their own creative product. I (and many others) had ascribed the actions of the patent office over the last few years as a combination of caving to corporate interests, and ineptitude. I'm starting to let go of the ineptitude - I think they are doing this on purpose.

Corporations of all stripes are in an incessant battle to expand their control of content and its delivery. Also from EFF is the story that the RIAA now says that it doesn't think that copying a CD that [you bought]{style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"} onto your iPod is fair use. That's right. Further, it turns out that there is an increasing effort to change the rules of internet traffic, and set priorities, and charge more for certain kinds of traffic (limiting, for instance, Skype traffic) or from certain origins (e.g. corporate traffic gets higher priority than, say, this blog.) I've always considered these sorts of things to be basically issues of corporations, as is their mission, to continually increase their profits.

But the recent events and wholehearted cooperation of companies like Google, MSN, Yahoo and others to happily censor content in China (which I had also ascribed to the profit motive), as well as the emerging picture of increased controls and limits on the creation and dissemination of creative content, is making me think a lot about what this is all about. I hate to wonder whether or not there is a connection between all of this stuff and the fact that we have one of the most power-hungry and controlling governments in history.

The whole RIAA/MPAA thing had, for a while, made me think that alternatives to the dissemination of music and movies would have to happen - creators would realize that these organizations don't work in their interest, and start their own companies and distribution methods. This has begun to happen, but the problem is that if the technology is locked down using things like Microsoft's Trusted Computing which could ultimately control what you can see and hear from your computer and other technology (there are all sorts of controls being built into the new generation of DVD players, that use blue lasers), then it is possible that alternative avenues will be squeezed or locked out. It seems that technology companies have been jumping overthemselves lately to cater to controlling interests, whether it be our government in spying, China in censorship, or hardware and software manufacturers with imbedded DRM.

So, it all adds up to, at best a nasty mess, at worst, complete control of not only how we can use content we own, but complete control of content creation, delivery, and viewing. That's the conspiracy theory. It's probably either silly, or a gross oversimplification of a complex reality. It does strengthen my already growing luddite tendencies, though. If they want to control me through technology, I'll let go of the technology. We can't get too attached.

technorati tags: patents, eff, clearchannel, recording, music, concerts, technology, government, control, corporations

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Intellectual Property

Law

Music

Technology

{.post-icon .standard}

A Jewish Anti-Semitic Cartoons Contest

On 16 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Really, I'm not making this up. An Israeli Jew has started a contest for Jews to submit their anti-semitic cartoons to. I'm not quite sure what I think of this, but it certainly is an interesting response to the whole Danish cartoon fiasco. A quote:

"We'll show the world we can do the best, sharpest, most offensive Jew hating cartoons ever published!" said Sandy "No Iranian will beat us on our home turf!"

Let me know what you think.

technorati tags: danish, cartoons, antisemitic, israel

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Continue Reading

Huh?

On 16 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I tend not to like John Dvorak, who some people (for reasons that are not at all apparent to me) think of him as some sort of tech guru. Anyway, this week, he proposes that perhaps Apple will drop it's proprietary OS (OS X) and switch to Windows, now that Macs work on Intel architecture. He for sure gets my "people who are out of their minds" award this week! (He beat out Dick Cheney.)

He says:

The only fly in the ointment will be the strategic difficulty of breaking the news to the fanatical users. Most were not initially pleased by the switch to Intel's architecture, and this will make them crazy.\ \ Luckily, Apple has a master showman, Steve Jobs. He'll announce that now everything can run on a Mac. He'll say that the switch to Windows gives Apple the best of both worlds. He'll say this is not your daddy's Windows. He'll cajole and cajole, and still hear a few boos. But those will be the last boos he'll hear, for then the Mac will be mainstream. We will welcome the once-isolated Apple mavens, finally.

This is nuts. Remember Apple's motto: "Insanely great"? No machine running any version of a Microsoft operating system will ever be "Insanely great." Plus, Macintosh sales are growing, not shrinking.

Yes, there are fanatical Apple users (like me) but there are a whole host of professionals (videographers, photographers, musicians, publishers, etc.) for whom the Mac OS is a necessary part of their work. Apple makes a lot of money selling software for those markets, and I would be hard pressed to believe that they would move that whole group over to Windows. This is just not going to happen, no matter how much John might want it to.

technorati tags: mac, windows, osx, macintel, technology

Blog Category: 

Technology

When will we get it?

On 14 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Last week, in San Diego, authorities found a furnished two bedroom apartment in a storm drain. Apparently, quite a lot of work and ingenuity went into the project of setting this place up. How many different ways will people have to be homeless (like the folks from New Orleans who have been kicked out of their hotel rooms) before we realize that homelessness is again a huge and growing problem, and one that needs to be addressed in systemic ways? The booming real estate market of the early 21st century that seems to have benefitted so many with economic resources, has another effect: making the process of finding a home for those who don't have resources increasingly difficult.\

Via BoingBoing.\

technorati tags: homelessness

Blog Category: 

Uncategorized

Cheney needs this...

On 14 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Cheneychart\ 'Nuff said. From BoingBoing.

Blog Category: 

Humor

{.post-icon .standard}

This has got to be a metaphor for something...

On 12 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Cheney accidently shoots a fellow hunter. (Really!!!)

technorati tags: cheney, hunting

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

An element I never, ever thought about

On 12 Feb, 2006 By mpm

In reading my del.icio.us inbox, I happened upon an article (it's actually from last year) in a pretty obscure website, called EnergyBulletin.net, which is a website devoted to news and ideas relating to peak oil. It's quite interesting, and depressing and all that, so I won't read it much, or blog about it much.\ \ This article I really have to blog about, because it brings up an issue that I'd never thought about, but it would be a good thing if I did. The issue is the relationship between oil exports/imports and currency. Basically, oil is traded in both dollars and euros. The author of this article (William Clark) argues that one very un-reported reason why Iraq was invaded was because they were about to switch from trading oil in dollars to trading oil in euros. And he also argues (fairly persuasively, I might add) that an invasion of/attack on Iraq is possible because they are about to (in March 2006) embark on an oil bourse (n. A stock exchange, especially one in a continental European city.) which will trade oil in euros, not in dollars.\ \ He says:

The macroeconomic implications of a successful Iranian bourse are noteworthy. Considering that in mid-2003 Iran switched its oil payments from E.U. and ACU customers to the euro, and thus it is logical to assume the proposed Iranian bourse will usher in a fourth crude oil marker -- denominated in the euro currency. This event would remove the main technical obstacle for a broad-based petroeuro system for international oil trades. From a purely economic and monetary perspective, a petroeuro system is a logical development given that the European Union imports more oil from OPEC producers than does the U.S., and the E.U. accounted for 45% of exports sold to the Middle East. (Following the May 2004 enlargement, this percentage likely increased).

So what does this really mean? Well, remember the little dust-up last year when China said it would stop pegging its currency to the dollar? The basic situation is this: the less trade happens in dollars (whether it be oil, commodities, whatever) and the less people buy and use dollars, the less the dollar is valued, and less economic power the United States has - basically, it completely threatens our global economic dominance. We have made this situation so much worse by our enormous level of debt - and the more debt we have, the more dire our situation is, if the dollar gets devalued.

The possibility of a huge market in oil traded in euros instead of dollars is a pretty big deal, one that is so big, that this author thinks that the neocons in charge would be willing to nuke Iran because of it (using some other excuse as a cover).

I think that's going way too far, but I agree with his assertion that the ways in which the economics underlies some specific foriegn policy, particulary the economics of the (petro)dollar, is something that just isn't reported on, or investigated enough. Anyway, the article is worth a read, even though it will cause some eye strain for those of us who are not economists.

technorati tags: oil, Iran, dollar, euro

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Environment

Continue Reading

Danish Cartoon Mess

On 12 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I have been struggling to understand and articulate my ideas around the recent mess of the Muhammad cartoons in the Danish newspaper. However, Gary Younge at The Nation (of course) has done it far better than I could have. It's a good read.

One of the most important parts of this mess, which I hadn't understood is this:

Four months after the cartoons were published, Jyllands-Posten's editor apologized. In the intervening time Muslims engaged in mostly peaceful protests. Several Arab and Muslim nations withdrew their ambassadors from Denmark while demonstrators picketed embassies. According to Denmark's consul in Dubai, a boycott of Danish products in the Gulf would cost the country \$27 million in sales.\ ...\ For as criticism mounted, other European newspapers decided to reprint the cartoons in solidarity with Jyllands-Posten.

He calls this action "inflammatory". I have to agree. Anyway, read the rest.

technorati tags: muhammed, cartoons, danish, arab, muslim

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Religion

Pillow Fight Anyone?

On 11 Feb, 2006 By mpm

Apparently, on February 14th (just 3 days away) there is going to be a public pillow fight in San Francisco. This is apparently a new trend. And, of course Flickr has the evidence.

749281_751a58fb63{width="250" height="187"}\ I think this is what we need. Less war, more pillow fights.

technorati tags: pillowfight, public, sanfrancisco

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

TreeHugger greatest hits

On 11 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I've already told everyone how much I love Treehugger. Well, here's some more evidence:

I left out all the depressing stories about how we're going to run out of oil really soon. You don't need to read those, you already know that stuff anyway.

technorati tags: treehugger, environment, water, food, recycling, katrina, oil

Blog Category: 

Environment

The Pacific Ocean smells different ...

On 11 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

than the Atlantic. Less tangy perhaps? It's subtle. If anyone has any ideas as to why this is, let me know.

I spent a wonderful day at the beach today. It was great - we went to Stinson Beach, a place I've been a couple of times before. It was popular. It was a little bit amazing that I was on the beach, and enjoying it, on February 11th. I did bring some work with me, and read for a couple of hours (and studied my Hebrew) so I felt virtuous. I apologize about talking of the beach to all of you about to succumb to the "blizzard of '06".

We also went to Sausalito, and had a great time hanging out.

The Bay Area is beginning to agree with me greatly.

technorati tags: sausalito, beach, pacific, ocean, atlantic

Blog Category: 

Personal

Continue Reading

Hamas (guest blogger)

On 09 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 5 Comments

Why is Hamas (the Islamic Resistance Movement) targeted for its religious underpinnings in a way that the Jewish state is not? Can either Hamas or the Zionist state truly be a voice for the visions, goals, and daily survival of all of its peoples? Are the majority of members of the Knesset and the majority of Hamas parlimentarians in support of women's self determination and an end to violence of all kinds? Currently, Hamas has gone further with this than the Zionist, holding to a cease fire, while the IDF continues to massacre young Palestinian girls in their streets.

This is a guest post from my friend, and Middle East Historian, Elise Young, Associate Professor of History at Westfield State College, and, thankfully, on this side of the continent on sabattical this year. She expresses the complexities around the recent victory of Hamas in the Palestinian Parlementary elections with an informed opinion that I thought would be useful for people to hear.

Historical commentary has been one of the positive outcomes of reaction to the Palestinian elections with The Islamic Resistance Movement- Hamas, gaining a majority of seats in the Parliament. Those following the outpouring of editorials have learned about the kinds of activities that made the Muslim Brotherhood popular in Egypt and finally Hamas as an offshoot- providing social services in lieu of the state, refusing to capitulate to the demands of its oppressors-  a respected spokesperson of a people being brutalized daily.

The larger context includes the streams of Arab nationalism, pan-Islamism, Arabism, and other comparable responses in the Arab world to developments post World War One. While these movements have their roots in responses to indigenous politics, geo-political developments have also played a major role. It's important to remember, as a friend noted in an e-mail recently, that Hamas developed in the context of an anti-colonial struggle and to think about other similar anti-colonial struggles, for example, the Algerian struggle against the French. Were those anti-colonial forces 'treated' in the same way- framed, even by the 'left', as terrorists? I don't think so. They were seen as what Hamas calls itself- as a resistance movement to colonialism.

In the United States, the spector of Hamas that has been raised by the media for years, is having its impact on how we evaluate and discuss the elections. Even the most liberal take as their starting point that Hamas is a terrorist group and that because Hamas has engaged in terrorism they cannot be recognized or engaged with. The nature of the anti-colonial struggle gets dropped out. But if you read the biographies that have been circulating of the 15 Hamas men who were elected to the Parliament, but who are in Israeli prisons, you might become 'confused.' It is not longer so easy to see Hamas  through colonial eyes, or to define resistance as terrorism with the same 'meaning's as the terrorism of one of the most highly armed militaries in the world. Here's just one, and the others are not that different- "Hatem Qafisheh is a businessman who owns a tourism company, which also facilitates the Hajj pigrimage. He also studied contemporary Middle Eastern politics, and Islamic studies before having his studies interrupted by prison. Qafiesheh is a former deportee to Marj a-Zuhour, in addition to being a survivor of the 1994 Hebron massacre, where 29 Palestinian worshippers were killed by US/Israeli citizen Baruch Goldstein at an early morning prayer service. Qafeisheh was arrested and detained for 27 months after those events, and was a leading figure in the "Intifada of the Administrative Detainees" a hunger strike for prisoner rights held in Mejiddo, Damoun, and Talmond prisons in the mid 1990s." This is not to excuse or condone the terrorism of war in any context; rather, we have to be clear once again that violence breeds violence and that non-violence is the only historic tradition that makes sense.

In order for us to understand Hamas we have to acknowledge the violent expropiration and colonization of Palestine- the ground on which the Zionist state was built and continues to expand. The current U.S. government perpetrates a violent geo-political agenda and violent domestic agenda that is not new, of course, in this country. We have a sordid history of torture against Africans and a major historical role in the colonizing of the Middle East and we are in the forefront of those on-going processes today. Bush's controlling and conservatizing agenda for women fits his religious agenda; he has this in common with Hamas. Our vigilance about anti-Semitism and gender issues in relation to Hamas; our vigilance about anti-Arab racism and gender issues in relation to the Zionist state; our vigilance about racism and gender issues  in the U.S., must be strong and must emerge out of an ideology that connects raicsm and the downpression of women everywhere in order to be effective.

So, liberals and others ask, can we consider Hamas a partner for peace? The question is disturbing. When has the U.S. Government or the Zionist state ever been partners for peace? In fact, any attempts at parity in negotiating peace have been squelched by the U.S., not supported. The question itself reveals identification with power.

It's helpful to watch how we react to this development while its meaning unfolds over time. In that way, as we peel away more and more layers of our own often unacknowledged to ourselves, identification with that which we fight against, then we get closer to reconfiguring our work- we become more honest, learn more about those we assume to be our 'enemies' by understanding who they are in historical context and from their perspectives. We can ask questions that are not mired in party affiliation (which means so many different things to party members), but that expose the politics of those in power in relation to the issues undergirding the war- violence against nature, privitization of resources, violence against women, against racialized peoples- issues that are critical to the survival of this planet.

Nationalism is itself a kind of religion and in many contexts reifies women as mothers of the nation in a 'religious' way. Here, women represent the purity and wholeness of the nation. So elevated, they deserve to be fed- and they are. So elevated, they are redeemed. Strong political women throughout the world, here and abroad, support this agenda as feminist. The often contradictory meanings of women's liberation in a range of geographic contexts is inevitable at this particular historical juncture given the range of circumstances women face. We all are included in the dictum that we must wage peace, not war.

Bush's reaction to the Hamas success makes it appear as though he stands over and against Hamas. But my fear is that Bush's policies further entrench the more conservative elements of Hamas (which has been the case historically since the U.S. armed Hamas), and that the Hamas success will further validate Bush's religious fundamentalism. They are the head and tail of the same beast when looked at in a large categorical way.

It simply cannot serve humankind to continue the racialized, sexualized, hierarchical statist system that governs societies in our era. There can be no two state solution, no partners for peace, in this colonialist context. But there can be, as we transition to a new form of governing ourselves, equal representation by all ethnic/religious/racial groups and genders in a single governing body in the region- what some call a secular 'democratic' form of governance. The governing principle would be the highest good of all, including the land and our precious air, water, wood and animals.

technorati tags: isreal, hamas, palestine, women, religion,politics

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Sacred text

On 09 Feb, 2006 By mpm

I love, I mean [love]{style="font-weight: bold;"}, getting my mind blown in seminary. This week is the week I get my mind blown in two different directions by approaches to sacred texts. I once wrote a ministry blog post on the bible (I promise, really, to do a ministry blog post in the next week, it's taken me a while to get back up to speed.) That post was about my own perspective on the text, and what good I think it is.

What's fascinating me now, is the amazingly complicated and convoluted process that happened over extraordinary periods of time to accomplish the book (and it's various versions) that I carry with me to class. I've pretty much always understood that it wasn't really a reasonable suggestion that the bible was inerrant. It's just now that I'm realizing how ridiculously unreasonable that suggestion is. I'm not even going to try and collapse 6 hours of classroom time about this subject into a blog post, but anyone who has, in any even half-serious way studied the bible, and any parts of the process of going from original manuscripts (which we do not have) to modern books, has to admit that it's just not possible for this to be so. Besides contradictions, blatant additions, subtractions and changes that have been systematically found to be missing in older manuscripts, the number of variants of text (providing the need for verse by verse analysis of the extant manuscripts,) translation issues (translation is by nature interpretation,) it is, in my view, extremely disingenuous to even suggest that the bible is inerrant. And it is unconscionable that people who went to seminary, and must have learned at least bits and pieces of this story get up in the pulpit, and point to the book, and say "God says..." There are a ton of fascinating and completely blatant examples (like the verse in I John that has a trinitarian declaration in the King James Version, that does not exist in early greek manuscripts.)

So the second direction of mind-blowing today is from my Jewish mysticism class, where I'm learning that for the most part, for Jews, as the Torah is the direct revelation from God to Moses, that it can't possibly mean just what it says - that there has to be more to it. Plus, engaging with the text in a questioning, even argumentative way, is a good thing. And, that anything anyone writes in terms of commentary on the Torah, etc., was within that revealed to Moses by God.  (I am totally not doing this justice - perhaps in a few weeks I can do better.)

So you have two points of view: On one hand, the Christian (I think Protestant, actually, I think Catholics have a different approach) view, which starts with inerrancy (the text means what it says and says what it means, and you can't question it), and then moves inevitably (and rightly so) in the direction of critiquing that absurd view. In my opinion, this starting point and subsequent critical process reduces the richness, depth and meaning of the text, and it's abilities to speak to us about God. On the other hand, there is the Jewish view, which, in my opinion enhances the richness, depth and meaning of the text, and makes it more approachable, and increases its ability to speak to us about God. So which would I pick? I think it's obvious. It's not that I can accept, fully, the fundamental idea behind the Jewish notion of Torah as the direct revelation to Moses, but the overall approach is one that I think makes so much more sense. Unfortunately, we don't get to start again from scratch, but it's something to keep in mind.

technorati tags: bible, scripture, sacred, inerrancy, christians, jews, judaism, christianity

Blog Category: 

Religion

My Datebook

On 07 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 2 Comments

I should be reading for a class, but my favorite procrastination technique, by far, is blogging. Be that as it may, I want you all to know that I am slowly, but surely, moving to luddite status. Gasp! You say "Michelle, a luddite? Never!"

Well, not to go too far out of my way to prove you wrong, I bought a 2006 datebook yesterday. I actually bought the datebook in the presence of a dear friend who was visiting me, who had bought a Palm Pilot the same year I did (he beat me by 6 months, because I was dilly-dallying about whether I'd buy a Palm or a Newton.) That was almost 10 years ago. So this is the first datebook I've owned in almost 10 years.

You are asking yourself why I bought this datebook. Well, the reason most of you use a datebook. You are scratching your heads now, I know it. I realized that, well, I really missed writing things in. I missed the ease of a quick jotted note. I missed the "penciling in" of tentative events. I missed the physicality of the book. Now that my schedule is so simple that I pretty much know what I'm doing in my head, I really don't need much more than a datebook. And I have decided that basically, if my schedule gets too complicated for a datebook, it's too complicated, and I need to simplify it. So a datebook it will always be.

I'm getting to the point where I like my technology inobtrusive, and really useful. I'm losing the desire for technology for it's own sake (really, I'll be OK, I promise) There was a time when keeping my schedule on a computerized device of some sort or another was necessary. But it is no longer, so why not ditch yet another technology for the simplicity of paper and pen? What a concept.

Then again, just ask my dorm-mate about what I said when she asked me to tell her about Apple's pending switch to Intel processors. (She said "Wow, you know a lot.") It will be a long road.

technorati tags: palmpilot, datebook, simplicity, schedule

Blog Category: 

Personal

Technology

How I get my news now

On 03 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

As many of you know, I have a complicated relationship with the news. Frankly, I'm a news junkie, and I've tried various methods to cure my addiction. A while ago (2003), I did a cold-turkey - and didn't read the news, listen to the news, watch the news, etc. But that didn't last more than 6 months or so. I soon had my habit back, along with the obsession of obtaining a copy of the Sunday New York Times each week.

With the blog era, I slowly but surely obtained feeds of various different news sources, and then various political blogs, and kept up with all of that. Lately, I realized that I was suffering from that particular form of my addiction, and cleaned out my blogroll.

Sometimes, I listen to Democracy Now! online, which is a much better source of news than most. But it is [unrelentingly depressing]{style="font-weight: bold;"}. The news is depressing and Amy Goodman is depressing telling depressing news.

So, what's a news junkie to do to keep sane? Hearing depressing news from a young, smart, really funny dyke from Western Mass! Nothing is better. Rachel Maddow is my news junkie methadone. I should have listened to Cindy a lot sooner.

technorati tags: news, rachelmaddow

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Why flying isn't such a good idea

On 02 Feb, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I'm really enjoying TreeHugger. Just the perfect combination of good new ideas, concrete (sometimes depressing) information, and hopefulness. Today they have a post on how taking an airplane uses an incredible amount of fuel. One transatlantic flight for a family of four results in twice the energy emissions as driving 12,000 miles, and is more than that family will generate in a year. So perhaps my plan to drive back to the east coast this summer isn't so crazed after all.

technorati tags: airplanes, travel, driving, trains, emissions, climate

Blog Category: 

Environment

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

The mystic in me, where did it come from, and where is it going?

On 31 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I had a class today, where we were all going around the room, and the teachers had asked for a one word, or one phrase description of ourselves that would help them remember us. I said "I'm a mystic." Someone asked me once why I called myself a mystic. I had to think a minute or two. In that process, I realized that I came to that label not so much from a head space, but from a heart space, which is why I have a hard time sometimes explaining why I think I am one. But what's also true is that every time I read mystics and about mysticism, I feel affirmed (and it gets easier to explain to people.)

In 2004 my good friend Cindy and I co-led a summer service. Cindy introduced me to Rev. Tom Owen-Towle's concept of UUs as "free-thinking mystics with hands,"which, no matter my denomination, still fits me. I realize I've been a mystic for a long time, but I didn't recognize what it was. I've always been looking for God, looking to be with God, wanting to know God. It does feel pretty hard-wired in me, though. I looked for God when I was a 14 year old who wanted to be confirmed as a Presbyterian. I looked for God when I joined the Nazarenes. I looked for God in the Tao, in the Dharma, in the 7 Principles of UUism. I'm still looking for God. Sometimes I feel like my search for God is like that math problem about when will you get from point A to point B if you cover 1/2 the remaining distance each step? (The answer is never.) I get closer, and closer, but never quite manage to touch God (although, in a subject for a different blog entry, sometimes God touches me.)

Being a Protestant mystic in 2006 is kinda strange (although I'm getting the impression that it's not quite as strange as it might have been in 1906, or 1806.)  I'm not sure I'm a very good mystic (but maybe that's also a subject for another entry.) And Protestantism (save the Anglicans and the Quakers) tried hard (and largely suceeded) to wipe mysticism and contemplative practice from their tradition. Thank Goddess some people are beginning to realize that wasn't such a good idea (took them long enough). So maybe I get to be part of the new trend. Who knows. Mystic bloggers, anyone?

technorati tags: mysticism, mystics, protestant, God

Blog Category: 

Personal

Religion

Seminary

Continue Reading

The Shame of Earthsea

On 31 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I just read a great essay by Pam Noles about, among other things, the adaptation of "A Legend of Earthsea" by Ursula LeGuin by the SciFi channel last year. I read about this essay in BoingBoing, and there has been some interesting commentary on it.

It's really nice to read the perspective of another black woman sci-fi fan, there are so few of us. And she's a damn good writer, too.

technorati tags: sciencefiction, scifi, writing, race

Blog Category: 

Science Fiction

Leaving Unitarian Universalism

On 30 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 8 Comments

I got a letter in the mail today. It's not really significant, on one level. On the other, it is very significant. What I got in the mail was the confirmation of the appointment I have with Section A of the Committee on Ministry of the Northern California Nevada Conference of the United Church of Christ (UCC), for what's called an "In-Care" interview. The meeting isn't until next year (2007), and there are steps to take beforehand. But it is the second step I've taken on the path to being ordained in UCC ministry (the first being joining New Spirit Community Church). I'm at the very beginning, but I'm also very cognizant of the fact that I have stepped off the path to UU ministry.

Some of you have read my piece about returning to Christianity. That path, that process, did not in any way preclude me from continuing on in UU ministry. In fact, there are plenty of UU Christians who are in ministry. So why am I leaving UUism?

There is basically only one reason, although that reason is multidimensional. The reason is this: where am I most likely to find a comfortable context (organizationally) to practice my ministry? No organization is going to be perfect, and if you know me, you know that I find it difficult when organizations don't walk their talk.

I'm a pretty unique person in a lot of ways. But I am, basically, an African American lesbian Christian mystic. UCC churches, like UU churches differ widely, and there are surely some in the UCC that would not want to call an African American, and there are surely many that would not want to call an out lesbian. I've been dealing with issues of race and sexuality for a long time now, and am pretty used to it. Unfortunately, the UUA has a fairly abysmal record of ordaining people of color into full time ministry, and I know that both race and class are still [huge]{style="font-weight: bold;"} issues in the UUA, issues that are not going away any time soon. The UCC is more ethnically diverse than the UUA, and I think they [get]{style="font-weight: bold;"} class much better than the UUA. But this doesn't mean I won't be involved in issues regarding race, class and sexuality - those are ever present. In the final analysis, it was being a Christian that was the pivot point. In all honesty, I didn't want to have to add the Christian battle, or the language of reverence battle, or the Jesus battle, to those other battles too. It just seemed like way too much to handle. There are few Christian-oriented or Christian-leaning UU congregations, and so it would not be likely that I'd be called to one. I didn't want to have to worry that if I used the "G" word, or the "J" word too much in "worship" (can't really use that word either) I'd offend someone. It felt too constraining. I also didn't want to be in yet another of what I have percieved to be a somewhat aggrieved (though persistant and loyal) minority within the UUA.

I hope this doesn't come across as either dismissive or whiny. My UU congregation is a community that was very important to my own journey, and one I treasure to this day. I am very thankful that there are communities like it in the world - that embrace diversity of spiritual paths, and provide community for all of that diversity. I hope that in my own ministry, in whatever form it takes, I'll be able to balance the respect of religious diversity, the desire to provide a safe space for people who've been hurt by religion and a space for people to worship in the ways that work for them. It's going to be an interesting journey, for sure, but it's a different path than I'd expected to begin with.

technorati tags: ucc, ministry, ordination, uu

Blog Category: 

Uncategorized

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

The virtual meets the real (or is it the real meets the virtual)

On 30 Jan, 2006 By mpm

Two "events" (I use the term lightly) occured in that world of ones and zeros this week that are worth a mention. I bet that most of you won't care a whole lot one way or the other about either of these, but they are both really interesting object lessons in how the digital world and the real live flesh and blood world interact in very interesting ways.

The first issue is that Wikipedia, that wonderful collaboratively edited on-line encyclopedia, which has been shown to rival (if not completely outshine) it's traditional competitors in terms of bredth, depth and accuracy, has blocked a group of IP addresses (read: specific computers) from making changes to Wikipedia. What IP addresses are those, you might wonder? Are they in China? Are they attached to some particularly annoying 14 year old boys that like to vandalize entries? Nope. They are attached to the US Congressional offices. Yes, you read me correctly. Apparently, a number of congressional staffers have been caught egregiously changing their congresperson's bio, to be completely favorable, and vandalizing others. Sigh. I thought we were all adults. Oh, nevermind.

The second issue is in the world of gaming, particularly what are called Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOGs). There is one, I think it's the biggest (5.5 million players), called World of Warcraft (WoW.) Think elves and dwarves and swords and magic. I'm not giving it enough credit, but then I've never played it. Anyway, there has been lots of talk in the blogosphere (mostly in the part of the blogosphere I don't read) about their "don't ask, don't tell" policy toward LGBT folk. There is some interesting analysis about the policy in that link.

It is no surprise that not only the best (like Wikipedia itself, which is an amazing emergent creation of collaborative effort, as well as WoW, which is really an amazingly creative endeavor) but also the worst (silly behavior and discriminatory policies as mild examples) end up in anything that makes its way into the digital world. It is, after all, no matter what our intentions, still a reflection of all of what is human.

technorati tags: wikipedia, worldofwarcraft, virtual

Blog Category: 

Technology

Web/Tech

Weblogs

Continue Reading

Guest Bloggers

On 30 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I have some brilliant friends who will likely never blog (or at least aren't now.) So I thought it might be a good idea for me to provide them with a bit of an audience for their great stuff. So I'm going to blog for them. That is, they will email me their text, and I will post it for them, under their names. Expect the first of these guest bloggers soon, who will give us really good insight into the new issues around Palestine and Israel.

If you are one of my friends (old or new) who would like to guest blog, drop me an email.

Blog Category: 

Weblogs

My Urban Persona

On 30 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I caught a glimpse of her yesterday, having gone into the the city (um, that's San Francisco) on BART (um, that's Bay Area Rapid Transit) My urban public persona is very different than my New England semi-rural persona. My urban persona is more distant (behind the iPod), wary, observant, with a little tough swagger, a bit aggressive on the edges. My New England persona is open, expectant and soft, completely non-aggressive. I had noticed that my early few forays into the city were a bit, well, painful, whereas this time, it felt kinda normal. And my urban persona almost missed the blooming rosemary bush!!

I grew up in an suburban context, with frequent forays into über-urban territory (I think Manhattan counts as über-urban,) and I lived in Cleveland for 6 years. That urban persona that I thought I'd left permanently behind is finding her way back. I just have to decide whether or not I like her.

technorati tags: city, persona, behavior

Blog Category: 

Personal

{.post-icon .standard}

Why the Puritans got hoisted on their own petard

On 25 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I heard a great talk this morning by Herbert Locke, who is a professor at University of Washington. He gave a great talk at the Earl Lectures titled "America and the Theocratic Vision: Why America is Not a Christian Nation (and, Pray God, Never Will Be)". It was a fantastic talk, which looked at the original failure to create a Christian nation by the Puritans.

He made a fascinating point, one which makes a whole lot of sense, and is a different perspective than I'd been thinking of this whole thing. My standard perspective about this is that we can't, and shouldn't be a Christian nation because all faiths (and people of no faith) need to be fully a part of and empowered in our society, etc. I'm sure he would agree with this perspective, but his approach was one that really speaks specifically to Christians, about Christians.

His point was that the Protestant concept of the "priesthood of all believers" that is, the idea that one is free to interpret scripture for oneself, and determine God's will for oneself, and not be dependent upon a hierarchy for interpretation of God's will, by necessity promotes democracy, and empowers dissent. The desire for theocracy by the Puritans was done in by the democratic nature of Protestantism, and the basic idea that everyone is free to interpret God's will for themselves. And that we should never, like they did, confuse the kingdom of God (which is always an ideal) with any nation state.

It's just the same now. Fundamentalists don't get to decide for everyone how to interpret scripture, or how to decide what God's will is, just like the Puritans didn't 300 years ago. And we cannot let them continue to proclaim the ridiculous notion that the U.S. is God's chosen instrument.

So perhaps again, that inherently democratic (and messy, and chaotic, and wondrous) process of each individual having the right to decide for themselves how to interpret God's manifestation in their own lives, will eventually hoist the fundamentalists on their own petard.

technorati tags: christianity, protestant, puritans, progressive, fundamentalists

Blog Category: 

Religion

Continue Reading

Why I love the Berkeley Bowl

On 25 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

For those of you who have lived in Berkeley, you know the Berkeley Bowl. I knew about it, but it was always so crowded, and impossible to find parking, that I avoided it. But then, one Monday morning at 10:00 (perfect time to go) I went shopping. And I was a happy camper. I finally found a way to get good, wholesome food without breaking the (at this point tiny little) bank, like I would by going to Whole Foods (commonly nicknamed whole paycheck, or whole checkbook).

There is an entry on Tree Hugger about an article on Alternet - which puts Whole Foods to the WalMart test: can an entry-level employee at Whole Foods afford to shop there, even with the discount? The answer is, of course, no.

It's nice to know that yes, Virginia, it is possible to get good wholesome food, at prices that won't make you broke. Farmer's markets, CSA programs, co-ops (I left the Pioneer Valley just in time for the River Valley Market coop to get going in Northampton) etc., provide a nice alternative to Whole Foods, which is, after all, simply another publicly traded company, and its major mission is to maximize profit for shareholders, not provide good, healthy, wholesome food at reasonable prices. Yes, they pay better than WalMart, but that's hardly saying much, and they remain ardently anti-union. It's nice to have alternatives.

technorati tags: organic, food, coops, berkeley, walmart

Blog Category: 

Food

Continue Reading

George W. Does Zork

On 24 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

Remember Zork? I can't even begin to think about how many hours my twenty-something self spent exploring the text-only adventure world of Zork. I loved Zork. Two friends independently sent me this hilarious post from defective yeti, which is a blog I have come across, but don't read regularly. It's hilarious. Even if you don't remember Zork, you'll still get a kick out of it. And, sadly, it's all too true.

Oval Office
You are standing inside a White House, having just 
been elected to the presidency 
of the United States. You knew Scalia 
would pull through for you.

There is a large desk here, along with a few 
chairs and couches. The presidential seal is 
in the middle of the room and there is a full-length 
mirror upon the wall.

What do you want to do now?

> INVADE IRAQ
You are not able to do that, yet.

> LOOK MIRROR
Self-reflection is not your strong suit.

> PET SEAL
It's not that kind of seal.

> EXAMINE CHAIRS
They are two several chairs arranged around the
 center of the room, along with two couches. 
Under one couch you find Clinton's shoes.

...

technorati tags: zork, georgew, bush, iraq

Blog Category: 

Humor

Sweden gets it right

On 24 Jan, 2006 By mpm

In the five gazillion blog entries I will not catch up on, was this entry from Treehugger - a great environmental blog. It turns out, that Sweden's goal is to eliminate the use of fossil fuels by the year 2020. Yay Sweden! If they can do it, we can do it. It takes conscious effort, a bit of money for research, and political will. None of which seems to be present in this country. I hope that perhaps Sweden's example will help. Unfortunately, my bet is that Sweden will be sitting pretty while we're living the end of oil nightmare.

technorati tags: energy, environment, oil, sweden

Blog Category: 

Environment

{.post-icon .standard}

William Shatner's Cabin, and where are Hector and Sunshine?

On 23 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I'm back from Baja, Mexico. It was a really great trip. The only complaint was that it was a lot colder than we expected - too cold and windy to swim, snorkle or kayak, and we had some really cold nights for sleeping. Otherwise, it was chock full of neat adventures, wonderful conversation, intersesting people, incredible desert landscape, and beautiful ocean views.

There were some funny spots. Here are two. The cabin we stayed in at this little, extremely funky, out of the way place called Camp Gecko. There will be more on Camp Gecko soon. But it turns out that the cabin we stayed in there is the cabin that William Shatner (yes, that William Shatner) stays in when he visits Bahia de los Angeles.

Dsc00177{width="250" height="334"}

\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

The second funny spot was this cactus thing we ran into, on the road to Camp Gecko, with tinsel, and a sign saying "Hector y Sunshine." We had a blast making up stories about Hector and Sunshine. Hard working bajacalifornian mechanic meets hippy dippy flower child escaping from the US in her beat up VW microbus, which breaks down ...\ Dsc00198{width="250" height="386"}\ Check my flickr page regularly for baja photos. It will take a while for me to upload and tag them, but they will be up.

technorati tags: baja, mexico, travel

Blog Category: 

Uncategorized

Continue Reading

Guerro Negro, Baja California Sur

On 17 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 4 Comments

I´m sitting in a small, cute cybercafe in the town of Guerro Negro, Baja. My friend and I just spent a wonderful day on the ocean, watching grey whales - very close. There will be pictures up on Flickr once I get back - we got some nice whale shots, and shots of some very interesting sights.

I'm at this moment struggling with a Spanish language keyboard, as we´ve been struggling with our muy broken Spanish for the last couple of days.

Our entrance into Mexico was anticlimactic, to say the least. I spent a great weekend in the San Bernadino Mountains, with good friends. It snowed - which I hadn't at all expected. I drove down to San Diego to pick up my traveling friend, who flew in from the east coast. The next day, we were prepared to wait in line to get into Mexico, given what we'd read - the Tijuana crossing is the busiest border crossing. But there was no line. Not only that - there was no person waiting to ask us all those crucial questions - like what we were carrying, how long we were going to stay, etc. We did see a rather long line of cars trying to get into the US. We'll see how that end of the equation goes on Sunday (when we re-enter the states.)

Tomorrow we head to Bahiá de los Angeles - on the Sea of Cortez side of the penninsula. I'm not exactly sure why, but I really enjoy this place, Baja. I´m not sure whether it's the desert landscape, the ocean, or what. But I've already decided I'll be back.

Blog Category: 

Personal

Continue Reading

Off to Mexico

On 12 Jan, 2006 By mpm

One of the things I'd hoped when I moved to California, is that I'd get to go to Mexico at least a couple of times. So, the first time is coming up now. I'm driving down to Southern California to stop in with some friends in the mountains, then picking another friend up at the San Diego airport, and then driving down about mid-way down the peninsula. I'm very much looking forward to it. No laptop, although I have been told my cell phone will work. But, that means likely not much (if any) blogging from Mexico. But I'll take lots of pictures, and post them at some point.

And I'm brushing up on my Spanish.

technorati tags: mexico, travel

Blog Category: 

Personal

New Progressive Christian Resource

On 11 Jan, 2006 By mpm

As I've said before, I've nicknamed PSR "Progressive Christian Central." They are launching a new website in a couple of weeks, called Progressive Christian Witness. In their words it is

\

"an Internet-based initiative to strengthen progressive Christian voices in public discussion across America, especially in communities where the dominant voice is that of the religious right. Progressive voices proclaim the redemptive heritage of the Christian faith in a manner that is biblically and theologically responsible, ethically committed, and informed by current knowledge.\ \ [The Progressive Christian Witness]{style="font-style: italic;"} (PCW) presents a growing collection of resources that bring a progressive Christian perspective to significant issues in American life---for example, the authority of the Bible, gender and sexuality, government and economics, environmental stewardship, beginning and end of life ethical issues, and America's role in the world. PCW's Witness pages publish brief, theologically grounded articles on these topics."

You heard it here first. Given the fact that PSR has some of the best people talking, thinking and writing about these issues, this will be a fabulous resource. Clearly they are interested in living up to my nickname.

On a similar note, a group of progressive seminarians got together late last year (so long ago), and we're possibly cooking up something interesting. At least, we've got a blog roll. Look to the bar on the right. I'll keep you posted as things develop.

technorati tags: progressive, christian, blogs

Blog Category: 

Politics

Religion

Seminary

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

What part of the separation of church and state don't you understand?

On 09 Jan, 2006 By mpm

For reasons that escape me right at the moment, a while ago, I signed up a anonymous yahoo account to a Family Research Council mailing list. I hardly ever read my mail from this account, but happened to this morning, and was greeted by an email with this quote:

\

As the Indiana House of Representatives opens its 2006 session tomorrow, the first question facing lawmakers is to pray or not to pray in the name of Jesus. Last week, U.S. District Court Judge David Hamilton reaffirmed his November ruling that praying in the name of Jesus violated the high court's concoction of the "separation of church and state." The ruling was the result of a lawsuit filed by the Indiana branch of the ACLU. Several House members, Republican and Democrat, have said that if they are given the chance to open tomorrow's session they will defy the judge's order and open the session in Christian prayer. The Indiana House Speaker, Rep. Brian C. Bosma (R), who is challenging the federal court ruling, has said the session will be opened in prayer but that he will seek to abide by the judge's ruling pending the outcome of the challenge. It is important to note that the members of the clergy who open these sessions of the various legislatures are not employees of the state and are not paid by the state.\

There are a number of fascinating tidbits in this little paragraph. First off, the phrase "high court's concoction of the 'separation of church and state'." Um, I thought that was in the constitution. And the part about the clergy who open the sessions aren't "paid by the state." No, they aren't, but they are [praying the statehouse]{style="font-weight: bold;"}! Silly, me, that seems to me to suggest official sanction of Christianity. I have come to realize that it is the belief in exclusivity (we have the real truth, and no one else's truths are worth consideration) that is the main problem behind all of this stuff. I have a post about exclusivity percolating. Anyway, they certainly manage to win the "people who are out of their minds" award for the week.

technorati tags: politics, religion, indiana

Blog Category: 

Politics

Religion

Continue Reading

{.post-icon .standard}

Alito's confirmation hearings start on Monday

On 04 Jan, 2006 By mpm

The Senate confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito start on Monday. The American Bar Association has given him its highest rating for his qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court - which really is unquestionable. People For the American Way have a great report on Alito - very in depth. Interestingly enough, the prevailing question instead of abortion it seems will be presidential power, which Alito, apparently, is quite in favor of increased presidential power. This, more than anything, because of the wiretapping scandal, will probably make a huge difference in whether he gets confirmed. There are quite a number of conservative republicans that have serious problems with what's happened.

technorati tags: supremecourt, alito, senate

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Politics

Continue Reading

Quiz Junkie strikes again

On 04 Jan, 2006 By mpm

Here's a quiz I couldn't resist taking, and posting, especially given the result! Thanks to Gina:

[Siddhartha Gautama]{style="font-size: 1.4em;"}\       You two would probably really get along!     

Founder of Buddhism "All wrong-doing arises because of mind. If mind is transformed can wrong-doing remain?"     

    

\ \ \

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ |    [My test tracked 4 variables How you compared to other people | | your age and gender:]{#comparisonarea} | | | | > +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | > | ---------------------------- | You scored higher than 66% | | | > | ------------------------------ | on Intuitive | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > | | | | | > | ---------------------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | > | ---------------------------- | You scored higher than 50% | | | > | ------------------------------ | on Structured | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > | | | | | > | ---------------------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | > | ---------------------------- | You scored higher than 88% | | | > | ------------------------------ | on Mildness | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > | | | | | > | ---------------------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | > | ---------------------------- | You scored higher than 5% | | | > | ------------------------------ | on Traditional | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > | | | | | > | ---------------------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ------------ ----------------- | | | | > | ------------------------------ | | | | > | ----------------------- | | | | > +--------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | | > | |   | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+


Link: The Religion Founder You Resemble Test written by Stinkbot on Ok Cupid, home of the 32-Type Dating Test


Blog Category: 

Personal

Religion

Isn't it ironic?

On 03 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

You may, or may not, be aware of the censorship that Mainland China uses to restrict the access of its citizens to internet content - primarily content that is politically questionable (like issues relating to Tibet, Falung Gong, Taiwan, etc).

It turns out that some US companies, Microsoft among them, has been involved in helping the Chinese block these sites, or in censoring Chinese Bloggers. So a US company, hosted on US soil, which the Chinese are free to block, if they wish, are taking the initiative to take down controversial Chinese bloggers.

You might ask why would an American company, in the land of the free, home of the brave, help to censor content for the Chinese? In fact, if American companies stopped helping the Chinese, it would be quite likely that the Chinese would be unable to continue their practices - or at least it would be much more difficult.

The answer is, unfortunately quite obvious. China is a huge market, with huge potential. Anger them by not helping to censor their citizens, and you probably will lose that market. This is the ultimate in irony: market forces of capitalism helping to maintain a communist dictatorship.

And why should we care? In a capitalist system, making a profit is the only goal that matters. Democracy, freedom of speech, the pursuit of happiness, the greater good, the planet's health - are all secondary. You know which side most corporations will be on, when the rubber has to meet the road.

technorati tags: china, censorship, blogging, capitalism, communism, dictatorship, microsoft

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

NSA Thing

On 02 Jan, 2006 By mpm With 1 Comments

I've been percolating a post on this whole internal US spying story for a while now, and I think it's time to just get it out of my head, and onto this blog.\ \ First off, I think it's one of those stories that's kinda easy to ignore, for some reason. I've not been especially captivated by it, and I've noticed in my varied conversation with friends, that it's not a common topic. Part of this is because, well, YAWN, it's not like we didn't know it's happened before. It's kinda like deja-vu all over again. Cointelpro, version 2.0.

But there are a couple of little tidbits that are important to discuss here. First off, there's the way in which Bush has been willing to act as if breaking the law didn't matter. The ways in which he and his supporters drag out 9/11, and "we're at war" to justify whatever it is they are doing. If we now add up what Bush & co has done in the name of 9/11, it begins to scare me. Here's the list:

  • invade Afghanistan
  • spy on Americans
  • round up and incarcerate people simply because they are suspicous
  • keep people imprisoned for years without trial or charge
  • torture prisoners, and subject them to abuse and humiliation
  • invade a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, based on false intelligence
  • shovel billions of dollars to the mercinary-industrial complex

I think if we'd seen this list 6 years ago, right when Clinton was being impeached for lying about a blow job, and told that the sitting president hasn't been impeached, we'd not even begin to believe it.

The second piece of this is technical. Remember that thing, called "Total Information Awareness" or TIA? It was a plan, put forth by John Poindexter (remember him?) to basically allow the US government, through technology, to monitor email and phone calls. Congress cut the funding for that program, amidst public outcry. But those kinds of efforts didn't die, and, in the end, it was technology like that proposed by TIA that is at the heart of this issue. Here's a quote from a great article on Ars Technica about this:

It is entirely possible that the NSA technology at issue here is some kind of high-volume, automated voice recognition and pattern matching system. Now, I don't at all believe that all international calls are or could be monitored with such a system, or anything like that. Rather, the NSA could very easily narrow down the amount of phone traffic that they'd have to a relatively small fraction of international calls with some smart filtering. First, they'd only monitor calls where one end of the connection is in a country of interest. Then, they'd only need the ability to do a roving random sample of a few seconds from each call in that already greatly narrowed pool of calls. As Zimmermann describes above, you monitor a few seconds of some fraction of the calls looking for "hits," and then you move on to another fraction. If a particular call generates a hit, then you zero in on it for further real-time analysis and possible human interception. All the calls can be recorded, cached, and further examined later for items that may have been overlooked in the real-time analysis.

Also, because of new technology, and the way calls and emails are routed, and increasingly voice traffic is carried over internet protocols, it will get easier and easier to do massive surviellance on US citizens.

technorati tags: nsa, spying, wiretap, scandal

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs

Politics

Rights and Responsibilities

On 02 Jan, 2006 By mpm

I remember always kind of bristling at that language - when you have rights, you have responsibilities. I think I thought it was too constraining, or something. I've come to realize that we should talk a lot more about the responsibilities that come with the rights we have.

  • We have a responsibility to use our right to vote, to vote.
  • Because we have a right to hire people, so that we can make money off of their labor, we have the responsibility to pay them a living wage.
  • We have a right to spend our money, and a responsibility to the earth in the way we spend it.
  • We have a right to freedom of speech, and a responsibility to use it in a way that harms no one.
  • We have a right to worship in any way we wish, and a responsibility to respect everyone else's right to worship, or not, in their own way.

We have been given these rights, and keeping them is a responsibility. We're on the slippery slope to losing them, possibly permanently. We can't take them for granted anymore. Time to wake up.

technorati tags: community, rights

Blog Category: 

Current Affairs